Defining noninvasive approaches for sampling of vertebrates: Diversity

Conservation Biology

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 349-352

  Pauli, Jonathan N ^a,b   Whiteman, John P ^a   Riley, Meghan D ^a   Middleton, Arthur D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION GENETICS; ENDANGERED SPECIES; INVERTEBRATE; NATURE CONSERVATION; SAMPLING; SPECIES DIVERSITY;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; VERTEBRATE;

ANIMALS; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; VERTEBRATES;

UNITED STATES;

ANIMALIA; VERTEBRATA;

EID: 74549215144     PISSN: 08888892     EISSN: 15231739     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01298.x     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Adams, D. C., M. S. Di Bitetti, C. H. Janson, L. B. Slobodkin, and N. Valenzuela. 1997. An "audience effect" for ecological terminology: use and misuse of jargon. Oikos 80 : 632 636.
2. Arlettaz, R., P. Patthey, M. Baltic, T. Leu, M. Schaub, R. Palme, and S. Jenni-Eiermann. 2007. Spreading free-riding snow sports represent a novel serious threat for wildlife. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Biological Sciences 274 : 1219 1224.
3. Garshelis, D. L. 2006. On the allure of noninvasive genetic sampling - putting a face to the name. Ursus 17 : 109 123.
4. Gustine, D., K. L. Parker, and D. C. Heard. 2007. Using ultrasound measurements of rump fat to assess nutritional condition of woodland caribou in northern British Columbia, Canada. Rangifer 17 : 249 256.
5. Hodges, K. E. 2008. Defining the problem: terminology and progress in ecology. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 6 : 35 42.
6. Lancia, R. A., W. L. Kendall, K. H. Pollock, and J. D. Nichols. 2005. Estimating the number of animals in wildlife populations. Pages 106 153 in C. E. Braun, editor. Techniques for wildlife investigation and management. 6th edition. The Wildlife Society, Bethesda, Maryland.
7. MacKay, P., W. J. Zielinski, R. A. Long, and J. C. Ray. 2008. Noninvasive research and carnivore conservation. Pages 1 7 in R. A. Long, P. Mackay, W. J. Zielinski, and J. C. Ray, editors. Noninvasive survey methods for carnivores. Island Press, Washington, D.C.
8. Orlans, F. B., editor. 1988. Field research guidelines: impact on animal care and use committees. Scientists Center for Animal Welfare, Bethesda, Maryland.
9. Oyler-McCance, S. J., and P. L. Leberg. 2005. Conservation genetics in wildlife biology. Pages 632 657 in C. E. Braun, editor. Techniques for wildlife investigation and management. 6th edition. The Wildlife Society, Bethesda, Maryland.
10. Robbins, J. 2009. Tools that leave wildlife unbothered widen research horizons. New York Times 10 March. Available from http://www.nytimes.com/2009/ 03/10/science/10wild.html (accessed March 2009).
11. Schwartz, M. K., D. A. Tallmon, and G. Luikhart. 1998. Review of DNA-based census and effective population size estimators. Animal Conservation 1 : 293 299.
12. Silvy, N. J., R. R. Lopez, and M. J. Peterson. 2005. Wildlife marking techniques. Pages 339 376 in C. E. Braun, editor. Techniques for wildlife investigation and management. 6th edition. The Wildlife Society, Bethesda, Maryland.
13. Stedman's Medical Dictionary. 2008. Available from http://www.stedmans. com/ (accessed November 2008).
14. Taberlet, P., L. P. Waits, and G. Luikart. 1999. Noninvasive genetic sampling: look before you leap. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 14 : 323 327.