Health services research on end-of-life care

Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care

Volumn 3, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 190-194

  Costantini, Massimo ^a   Beccaro, Monica ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GENOA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Complex services and interventions; End of life; Evaluation; Needs assessment; Quality

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CAREGIVER; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; PALLIATIVE THERAPY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; STANDARD; TERMINAL CARE;

CAREGIVERS; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; PALLIATIVE CARE; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; TERMINAL CARE;

EID: 74549181497     PISSN: 17514258     EISSN: 17514266     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SPC.0b013e32832e67c3     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Lohr KN, Steinwachs DM. Health services research: an evolving definition of the field. Health Serv Res 2002; 37:15-17.
2. Costantini M, Higginson IJ. Health services research. In: Walsh D, Caraceni A, Fainsinger R, et al., editors. Palliative medicine. Saunders Elsevier; 2008. .
3. Higginson IJ, von Gunten CF. Population-based needs assessment for patient and family care. In: Bruera E, Higginson IJ, et al. editors. Textbook of palliative care. Hodder Arnold; 2006. pp. 251-258.
4. Higginson IJ, Costantini M. Dying with cancer, living well with advanced cancer. Eur J Cancer 2008; 44:1414-1424. This is one of a few population-based needs assessments that have been performed for advanced cancer patients. This study, by combining different sources of data, summarizes, describes and analyzes the multidimensional needs of cancer patients at the end of their lives and of their families at a European level.
5. Campbell M, Fitzpatrick R, Haines A, et al. Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. Br Med J 2000; 321:694-696.
6. Sampson EL, Thuné-Boyle I, Kukkastenvehmas R, et al. Palliative care in advanced dementia: a mixed methods approach for the development of a complex intervention. BMC Palliat Care 2008; 7:8.
7. Black N. Why we need observational studies to evaluate the effectiveness of healthcare. Br Med J 1996; 312:1215-1218.
8. National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE). Improving supportive and palliative care for adults with cancer: the Manual. National Institute of Clinical Excellence, London; 2004. www.nice.org.uk (accessed 30 March 2009).
9. Higginson IJ, Vivat B, Silber E, et al. Study protocol: delayed intervention randomised controlled trial within the Medical Research Council (MRC) Framework to assess the effectiveness of a new palliative care service. BMC Palliat Care 2006; 5:7.
10. Higginson IJ, Hart S, Burman R, et al. Randomised controlled trial of a new palliative care service: compliance, recruitment and completeness of followup. BMC Palliat Care 2008; 7:7. This study reports the first use in palliative care of both the MRC Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions and a 'fast-track' randomized trial. This method may provide a template for future studies in palliative and supportive care.
11. Mikhael J, Baker L, Downar J. Using a pocket card to improve end-of-life care on internal medicine clinical teaching units: a cluster-randomized controlled trial. J Gen Intern Med 2008; 23:1222-1227.
12. Luhrs CA, Penrod JD. End-of-life care pathways. Curr Opin Palliat Care 2007; 1:198-201.
13. Ellershaw J, Ward C. Care of the dying: the last hours or days of life. Br Med J 2003; 326:30-34.
14. Ellershaw JE. Care of the dying: what a difference an LCP makes! Palliat Med 2007; 21:365-368.
15. Ellershaw J, Smith C, Overill S, et al. Care of the dying: setting standards for symptom control in the last 48 h of life. J Pain Symptom Manage 2001; 21:12-17.
16. Veerbeek L, van der Heide A, de Vogel-Voogt E, et al. Using the LCP: bereaved relatives' assessment of communication and bereavement. Am J Hosp Palliat Care 2008; 25:207-214. This study explores the effectiveness of LCP program through a quasi-experimental design in a multicenter sample of Dutch patients.
17. Veerbeek L, van Zuylen L, Swart SJ, et al. The effect of the Liverpool Care Pathway for the dying: a multicentre study. Palliat Med 2008; 22:145- 151.
18. Simon S, Higginson IJ. Evaluation of hospital palliative care teams: strengths and weaknesses of the before-after study design and strategies to improve it. Palliat Med 2009; 23:23-28.
19. Ahmed N, Bestall JC, Ahmedzai SH, et al. Systematic review of the problems and issues of accessing specialist palliative care by patients, carers and health and social care professionals. Palliat Med 2004; 18:525-542.
20. Miyashita M, Sato K, Morita T, et al. Effect of a population-based educational intervention focusing on end-of-life home care, life-prolonging treatment and knowledge about palliative care. Palliat Med 2008; 22:376-382. This is one of a few studies that evaluate the effectiveness of a population-based educational intervention focused on the beliefs, preferences and attitudes on endof- life care.
21. Baxter S, Gallagher R. Public education. In: Bruera E, Higginson IJ, et al., editors. Textbook of palliative care. Hodder Arnold; 2006. pp. 153-160.