Pre-selection of suppliers through an integrated fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and max-min methodology

International Journal of Production Research

Volumn 48, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 1603-1625

  Şen, Ceyda Güngör ^a   Şen, Selçuk ^b   Başlgil, Hüseyin ^a  

^a YILDIZ TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b Supply Chain Management   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Fuzzy AHP; Max min approach; Multi criteria decision making; Prequalification of suppliers; Supplier selection

Indexed keywords

FUZZY AHP; MAX-MIN; MULTI CRITERIA DECISION MAKING; PRE-QUALIFICATION; SUPPLIER SELECTION;

ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; ELECTRONICS INDUSTRY; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS; MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING; MATHEMATICAL TECHNIQUES; STATISTICAL TESTS;

DECISION MAKING;

EID: 74549181279     PISSN: 00207543     EISSN: 1366588X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00207540802577946     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Aissaoui, N., Haouari, M., and Hassini, E., 2007. Supplier selection and order lot sizing modeling: a review. Computers and Operations Research, 34 (12), 3516-3540.
2. Barbarosoglu, G. and Yazgac, T., 1997. An application of the analytic hierarchy process to the
3. supplier selection problem. Production and Inventory Management Journal, 38 (1), 14-21.
4. Boender, C.G.E., de Grann, J.G., and Lootsma, F.A., 1989. Multicriteria decision analysis with fuzzy pairwise comparison. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 29 (2), 133-143.
5. Bozdaǧ, C.H., Kahraman, C., and Ruan, D., 2003. Fuzzy group decision making for selection among computer integrated manufacturing systems. Computers in Industry, 51 (1), 13-29.
6. Buckley, J.J., 1985. Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 17 (3), 233-247.
7. Büyüközkan, G., Kahraman, C., and Ruan, D., 2004. A fuzzy multicriteria decision approach for software development strategy selection. International Journal of General Systems, 33 (2), 259-280.
8. Chan, F.T.S., 2003. Interactive selection model for supplier selection process: an analytical hierarchy process approach. International Journal of Production Research, 41 (15), 3549-3579.
9. Chan, F.T.S., et al., 2008. Global supplier selection: a fuzzy AHP approach. International Journal of Production Research, 46 (14), 3825-3857.
10. Chang, D.Y., 1992. Extent analysis and synthetic decision. Optimization Techniques and Applications, 1 (5), 352.
11. Chang, D.Y., 1996. Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 95 (3), 649-655.
12. Cheng, C.H., 1996. Evaluating naval tactical missile systems by fuzzy AHP based on the grade value of membership function. European Journal of Operational Research, 96 (2), 343-350.
13. De Boer, L., Labro, E., and Morlacchi, P., 2001. A review of methods supporting supplier selection. European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 7 (2), 75-89.
14. Ghodsypour, S.H. and O'Brien, C., 1998. A decision support system for supplier selection using an integrated analytic hierarchy process and linear programming. International Journal of Production Economics, 56 (57), 199-212.
15. Haq, A.N. and Kannan, G., 2006. Design of an integrated supplier selection and multi-echelon
16. distribution inventory model in a built-to-order supply chain environment. International Journal of Production Research, 44 (10), 1963-1985.
17. Hinkle, C.L., Robinson, P.J., and Green, P.E., 1969. Vendor evaluation using cluster analysis. Journal of Purchasing, 5 (3), 49-58.
18. Holt, G.D., 1998. Which contractor selection methodology? International Journal of Project Management, 16 (3), 153-164.
19. Kahraman, C., Cebeci, U., and Ulukan, Z., 2003. Multi criteria supplier selection using fuzzy AHP. Logistics Information Management, 16 (6), 382-394.
20. Kahraman, C., Cebeci, U., and Ruan, D., 2004. Multi-attribute comparison of catering service companies using fuzzy AHP: the case of Turkey. International Journal of Production Economics, 87 (2), 171-184.
21. Kruskal, W.H. and Wallis, W.A., 1952. Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 47 (260), 583-621.
22. Kwong, C.K. and Bai, H., 2003. Determining the importance weights for the customer requirements in QFD using a fuzzy AHP with an extent analysis approach. IIE Transactions, 35 (7), 619-626.
23. Li, C.C., Fun, Y.P., and Hung, J.S., 1997. A new measure for supplier performance evaluation. IIE Transactions on Operations Engineering, 29 (9), 753-758.
24. Liu, F., Ding, F.Y., and Lall, V., 2000. Using data envelopment analysis to compare suppliers for supplier selection and performance improvement. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 5 (3), 143-150.
25. Liu, F.F. and Hai, H.L., 2005. The voting analytic hierarchy process method for selecting supplier. International Journal of Production Economics, 97 (3), 308-317.
26. Mikhailov, L., 2002. Fuzzy analytical approach to partnership selection in formation of virtual enterprises. Omega, 30 (5), 393-401.
27. Morlacchi, P., 1999. Vendor evaluation and selection: the design process and a fuzzy-hierarchical model. In: Proceedings of eighth IPSERA conference, 28-31 March 1999, Belfast, Dublin. University of Ulster.
28. Ng, S.T. and Skitmore, R.M., 1995. CP-DSS: decision support system for contractor pre-qualification. Civil Engineering Systems: decision Making Problem Solving, 12 (2), 133-160.
29. Nydick, R.L. and Hill, R.P., 1992. Using the analytic hierarchy process to the supplier selection problem. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 28 (2), 31-36.
30. Şen, S., et al., 2008. A framework for defining both qualitative and quantitative supplier selection criteria considering the buyer-supplier integration strategies. International Journal of Production Research, 46 (07), 1825-1845.
31. Talluri, S., 2002. A buyer-seller game model for selection and negotiation of purchasing bids. European Journal ofOperational Research, 143 (1), 171-180.
32. Talluri, S. and Narasimhan, R., 2003. Vendor evaluation with performance variability: a max-min approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 146 (3), 543-552.
33. Tam, M.C.Y. and Tummala, V.M.R., 2001. An application of the AHP in vendor selection of a telecommunications system. Omega, 29 (2), 171-182.
34. Timmerman, E., 1986. An approach to vendor performance evaluation. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 22 (4), 27-32.
35. Van Laarhoven, P.J.M. and Pedrycz, W., 1983. A fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 11 (1-3), 229-241.
36. Weber, C.A., Current, J.R., and Benton, W.C., 1991. Vendor selection criteria and methods. European Journal of Operational Research, 50 (1), 2-18.
37. Weber, C.A. and Ellram, L.M., 1993. Supplier selection using multi objective programming: a decision support systems approach. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 23 (2), 3-14.
38. Weber, C.A. and Desai, A., 1996. Determination of paths to vendor market efficiency using parallel coordinates representation: a negotiation tool for buyers. European Journal of Operational Research, 90 (1), 142-155.
39. Xia, W. and Wu, Z., 2007. Supplier selection with multiple criteria in volume discount environments. Omega, 35 (5), 494-504.
40. Yang, J.L., et al., 2008. Vendor selection by integrated fuzzy MCDM techniques with independent and interdependent relationships. Information Sciences, 178 (21), 4166-4183.
41. Zadeh, L.A., 1965. Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8 (3), 338-353.