Semi-automatic entity set refinement

NAACL HLT 2009 - Human Language Technologies: The 2009 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of the Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 290-298

  Vyas, Vishnu ^a   Pantel, Patrick ^a  

^a YAHOO RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; ONLINE SYSTEMS; SYSTEMATIC ERRORS;

LINEAR TIME COMPLEXITY; MANUAL LABORS; PRACTICAL ONLINE; PRACTICAL USE; REFINEMENT PROCESS; SEMI-AUTOMATICS; SET EXPANSIONS; STATE OF THE ART;

RANDOM ERRORS;

EID: 74549178421     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3115/1620754.1620796     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. Abney, S. Parsing by Chunks. 1991. In: Robert Berwick, Steven Abney and Carol Tenny (eds.), Principle-Based Parsing. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
2. Banko, M. and Brill, E. 2001. Scaling to very large corpora for natural language disambiguation. In Proceedings of ACL-2001.pp 26-33. Morristown, NJ.
3. Banko, M.; Cafarella, M.; Soderland, S.; Broadhead, M.; Etzioni, O. 2007. Open Information Extraction from the Web. In Proceedings of IJCAI-07.
4. Bayardo, R. J; Yiming Ma,; Ramakrishnan Srikant.; Scaling Up All-Pairs Similarity Search. In Proc. of the 16th Int'l Conf. on World Wide Web. pp 131-140 2007.
5. Brill, E. 1995. Transformation-Based Error-Driven Learning and Natural Language Processing: A Case Study in Part of Speech Tagging. Computational Linguistics.
6. Bunescu, R. and Mooney, R. 2004 Collective Information Extraction with Relational Markov Networks. In Proceedings of ACL-04.pp. 438-445.
7. Cohn, D. A., Atlas, L., and Ladner, R. E. 1994. Improving Generalization with Active Learning. Machine Learning, 15(2):201-221. Springer, Netherlands.
8. Dagan, I. and Engelson, S. P. 1995. Selective Sampling in Natural Language Learning. In Proceedings of IJCAI-95 Workshop on New Approaches to Learning for Natural Language Processing. Montreal, Canada.
9. Downey, D.; Broadhead, M; Etzioni, O. 2007. Locating Complex Named Entities in Web Text. In Proceedings of IJCAI-07.
10. Etzioni, O.; Cafarella, M.; Downey. D.; Popescu, A.; Shaked, T; Soderland, S.; Weld, D.; Yates, A. 2005. Unsupervised named-entity extraction from the Web: An Experimental Study. In Artificial Intelligence, 165(1):91-134. (Pubitemid 40556657)
11. Harris, Z. 1985. Distributional Structure. In: Katz, J. J. (ed.), The Philosophy of Linguistics. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 26-47.
12. Harman, D. 1992. Relevance feedback revisited. In Proceeedings of SIGIR-92. Copenhagen, Denmark.
13. Hearst, M. A. 1992. Automatic acquisition of hyponyms from large text corpora. In Proceedings of COLING-92. Nantes, France.
14. Kozareva, Z., Riloff, E. and Hovy, E. 2008. Semantic Class Learning from the Web with Hyponym Pattern Linkage Graphs. In Proceedings of ACL-08.pp 1048-1056. Columbus, OH
15. Lin, D. 1998. Automatic retrieval and clustering of similar words. In Proceedings of COLING/ACL-98.pp. 768-774. Montreal, Canada.
16. Nadeau, D., Turney, P. D. and Matwin., S. 2006. Unsu-pervised Named-Entity Recognition: Generating Gazetteers and Resolving Ambiguity. In Advances in Artifical Intelligence.pp 266-277. Springer Berlin, Heidelberg. (Pubitemid 44077472)
17. Negri, M. 2004. Sense-based blind relevance feedback for question answering. In Proceedings of SIGIR-04 Workshop on Information Retrieval For Question Answering (IR4QA). Sheffield, UK
18. Pantel, P. and Lin, D. 2002. Discovering Word Senses from Text. In Proceedings of KDD-02.pp. 613-619. Edmonton, Canada.
19. Paşca, M. 2007a. Weakly-supervised discovery of named entities using web search queries. In Proceedings of CIKM-07.pp. 683-690.
20. Pasca, M. 2007b. Organizing and Searching the World Wide Web of Facts - Step Two: Harnessing the Wisdom of the Crowds. In Proceedings of WWW-07. pp. 101-110.
21. Paşca, M.; Lin, D.; Bigham, J.; Lifchits, A.; Jain, A. 2006. Names and Similarities on the Web: Fact Extraction in the Fast Lane. In Proceedings of ACL-2006.pp. 113-120.
22. Paşca, M. and Durme, B.J. 2008. Weakly-supervised Acquisition of Open-Domain Classes and Class Attributes from Web Documents and Query Logs. In Proceedings of ACL-08.
23. Riloff, E. and Jones, R. 1999 Learning Dictionaries for Information Extraction by Multi-Level Boostrapping. In Proceedings of AAAI/IAAAI-99.
24. Riloff, E. and Shepherd, J. 1997. A corpus-based approach for building semantic lexicons. In Proceedings of EMNLP-97.
25. Sarmento, L.; Jijkuon, V.; de Rijke, M.; and Oliveira, E. 2007. "More like these": growing entity classes from seeds. In Proceedings of CIKM-07. pp. 959-962. Lisbon, Portugal.
26. Stevenson, M., Guo, Y. and Gaizauskas, R. 2008. Acquiring Sense Tagged Examples using Relevance Feedback. In Proceedings of COLING-08. Manchester UK.
27. Tang, M., Luo, X., and Roukos, S. 2001. Active learning for statistical natural language parsing. In Proceedings of ACL-2001.pp 120-127. Philadelphia, PA.
28. Vishwa. V, Wood, K., Milic-Frayling, N. and Cox, I. J. 2005. Comparing Relevance Feedback Algorithms for Web Search. In Proceedings of WWW 2005. Chiba, Japan.
29. Wang. R.C. and Cohen, W.W. 2007. Language-Independent Set Expansion of Named Entities Using the Web. In Proceedings of ICDM-07.
30. Zhou, X. S. and Huang, S. T. 2003. Relevance Feedback in Image Retrieval: A Comprehensive Review -Xiang Sean Zhou, Thomas S. Huang Multimedia Systems. pp 8:536-544.
31. Zhou, G. and Su, J. 2001. Named entity recognition using an HMM-based chunk tagger. In Proceedings of ACL-2001.pp. 473-480. Morristown, NJ.