So Far But Yet So Close: Student Chat Room Immediacy, Learning, and Performance in an Online Course

Journal of Interactive Learning Research

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 395-407

  Pelowski, Susan ^a   Frissell, Langley ^b   Cabral, Kyle ^a   Yu, Theresa ^a  

^a University of Hawaiíi West O ahu   (United States)

^b HAWAII PACIFIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 74549160571     PISSN: 1093023X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Andersen, J. F. (1979). Teacher immediacy as a predictor of teaching effectiveness. In D Nimmo (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 3 (pp. 543-559). New Brunswick, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
2. Andersen, J. F., Norton, R.W., & Nussbaum, J. F. (1981). Three investigations exploring the relationships between perceived teacher communication behaviors and student learning. Communication Education, 30, 377-392.
3. Arbaugh, J. B. (2001). How instructor immediacy behaviors affect student satisfaction and learning in web-based courses. Business Communication Quarterly, 30, 42-54.
4. Baker, J. D. (2004). An investigation of relationships among instructor immediacy and affective and cognitive learning in the online classroom. Internet and Higher Education, 7, 1-13.
5. Christensen, L. J., & Menzel, K.E. (1998). The linear relationship between student reports of teacher immediacy behaviors and perceptions of state motivation, and of cognitive, affective,and behavioral learning. Communication Education, 47, 82-90.
6. DeMaster, F., Reid, J., & Twentyman, C. (1977). The effects of different amounts of feedback on observer’s reliability. Behavior Therapy, 8, 317-329.
7. Freitas, F. A., Myers, S. A., & Avtgis, T. A. (1998). Student perceptions of instructor immediacy in conventional and distributed learning classrooms. Communication Education, 47, 366-372.
8. Frymier, A. B. (1994). A model of immediacy in the classroom. Communication Quarterly, 42(2), 33-144.
9. Frymier, A. B., & Thompson, C. A. (1995). Using student self-reports to measure immediacy: Is it a valid methodology? Communication Research Reports, 12(1), 85-93.
10. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7-23.
11. Gorham, J. (1988). The relationship between verbal teacher immediacy behaviors and student learning. Communication Education, 37, 40-53.
12. Guerrero, L. K., & Miller, T. A. (1998). Associations between nonverbal behaviors and initial impressions of instructor competence and course content in videotaped distance education courses. Communication Education, 47, 30-42.
13. Hackman, M. Z., & Walker, K. B. (1990). Instructional communication in the televised classroom: The effects of system design and teacher immediacy on student learning and satisfaction. Communication Education, 39, 196-206.
14. LaRose, R., & Whitten, P. (2000). Re-thinking instructional immediacy for web courses: A social-cognitive exploration. Communication Education, 49(4), 320-338.
15. Mehrabian, A. (1969). Some referents and measures of nonverbal behavior. Behavioral Research Methods & Instruments, 1, 213-217.
16. Microsoft PowerPoint (1997). [Computer Software]. Redmond, WA: Microsoft, Inc. Available: http://microsoft.com (phone: 1-425-882-8080).
17. Moore, A., Masterson, J. T., Christophel, D. M., & Shea, K. A. (1996). College teacher immediacy and student ratings of instruction. Communication Education, 45, 29-39.
18. Newlin, M. H., & Wang, A. Y. (2002). Integrating technology and pedagogy: Web instruction and seven principles of undergraduate education. Teaching of Psychology, 29(4), 325-330.
19. Picciano, A. G. (2002). Beyond student perceptions: Issues of interaction, presence, and performance in an online class. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 6(1), 21-36.
20. RealProducer 5.1 (1998). [Computer Software]. Seattle, WA: RealNetworks, Inc. Available: http://realnetworks.com/
21. Riffe, D., Lacy, S., & Fico, F. (1998). Analyzing media messages: Using quantitative content analysis in research. Mawah, NJ: Erlbaum.
22. Robinson, R.Y., & Richmond, V.P. (1995). Validity of the verbal immediacy scale. Communication Research Reports, 12(1), 80-84.
23. Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing social presence in synchronous text-based computer conferencing. Journal of Distance Education, 14(3), 51-71.
24. Richmond, V. P., Gorham, J. S., & McCroskey, J. C. (1987). The relationship between selected immediacy behaviors and cognitive learning. In M. McLaughlin (Ed.) Communication Yearbook 10, 574 – 590. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
25. Swan, K. (2002). Building learning communities in online courses: The importance of interaction. Education, Communication, & Information, 2(1), 23-48.
26. Wang, A.Y., Newlin, M.H., & Tucker, T. L. (2001). A discourse analysis of online classroom chats: Predictors of cyber-student performance. Teaching of Psychology, 28(3), 222-226.
27. Web Course Tools 2.1 (1998). [Computer software]. Vancouver, BC: WebCT, Inc. Available http://webct.com (phone: 1-604-677-8752).
28. Wiener, M., & Mehrabian, A. (1968). Language within language: Immediacy, a channel in verbal communication. New York: Appelton-Century-Crofts.