The effect of face-to-face collaborative learning on the elaboration of computer-based simulated cases

Simulation in Healthcare

Volumn 4, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 217-222

  De Leng, Bas A ^a   Muijtjens, Arno M ^a   Van Der Vleuten, Cees P ^a  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Collaboration; Computer based simulated cases; Undergraduate medical education

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; COOPERATION; FEMALE; GROUP PROCESS; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL STUDENT; NETHERLANDS; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, UNDERGRADUATE; FEMALE; GROUP PROCESSES; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; NETHERLANDS; QUESTIONNAIRES; STUDENTS, MEDICAL;

EID: 74549135140     PISSN: 15592332     EISSN: 1559713X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e3181a39612     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Slavin RE. Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research, and Practice. Boston: Allyn and Bacon; 1995.
2. Rogoff B. Apprenticeship in Thinking: Cognitive Development in Social Context. New York: Oxford University Press; 1990.
3. Hyun E. A study of 5-to 6-year-old children's peer dynamics and dialectical learning in a computer-based technology-rich classroom environment. Comput Educ 2005;44:69-91.
4. Cohen E. Restructuring the classroom: conditions for productive small groups. Rev Educ Res 1994;64:1-35.
5. Light P, Littleton K, Messer D, Joiner R. Social and communicative processes in computer-based problem solving. Eur J Psychol Educ 1994;9:93-109.
6. Howe C, Tolmie A, Mackenzie M. Computer support for the collaborative learning of physics concepts. In: O'Malley C, ed. Computer Supported Collaborative Learning. Vol. 128. NATO Advanced Study Institute series. Series F, Computer and systems sciences. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1995: 51-68.
7. Dillenbourg P, Baker M, Blay A, O'Malley C. The evolution of research on collaborative learning. In: Spada H, Reimann P, eds. Learning in Humans and Machines Towards an Interdisciplinary Learning Science. Oxford: Pergamon; 1995: 189-211.
8. Johnson DW, Johnson RT. Conflict in the classroom: controversy and learning. Rev Educ Res 1979;49:51-70.
9. Piaget J. The Equilibration of Cognitive Structures: The Central Problem of Intellectual Development. Brown T, Thampy K, translator. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1985.
10. Webb N. Peer interaction and learning in small groups. Int J Educ Res 1989;13:21-40.
11. Yackel E, Cobb P. Small-group interactions as a source of learning oppotunities in second-grade mathematics. J Res Math Educ 1991;22: 390-408.
12. Sharan S, Shaulov A. Cooperative learning, motivation to learn, and academic achievement. In: Sharan S, ed. Cooperative Learning: Theory and Research. New York: Praeger; 1990: 173-202.
13. Lou YP, Abrami PC, d'Apollonia S. Small group and individual learning with technology: a meta-analysis. Rev Educ Res 2001;71: 449-521.
14. Wegerif R. The role of educational software as a support for teaching and learning conversations. Comput Educ 2004;43:179-191.
15. King A. Structuring peer interaction to promote high-level cognitive processing. Theory Practice 2002;41:33-39.
16. Riedel J, Singer R, Heid J, et al. CAMPUS: a simulative, flexible, caseoriented web-based training system for multi-purpose use in PBL-curricula. In: Stensaas S, Fischer M, Batschkus M, Dietrich J, eds. Multimedia in Health Sciences Education. Berlin: Logos Verlag; 2001: 267-277.
17. Crook C. Computers and the Collaborative Experience of Learning. London: Routledge; 1996.
18. Crook C. Computers in the zone of proximal development: implications for evaluation. Comput Educ 1991;18:32-42.
19. Hojat M, Xu G. A visitor's guide to effect sizes. Adv Health Sci Educ 2004;9:241-249.
20. Pilkington R, ParkerJones C. Interacting with computer-based simulation: the role of dialogue. Comput Educ 1996;27:1-14.
21. Novak JD. Learning, creating, and using knowledge. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1998.
22. Perkins DN. Smart Schools: Better Thinking and Learning for Every Child. New York: The Free Press; 1992.
23. Reid D, Zhang J, Chen Q. Supporting scientific discovery learning in a simulation environment. J Comput Assist Learn 2003;19:9-20.
24. Barron B. Achieving coordination in collaborative problem-solving groups. J Learn Sci 2000;9:403-436.
25. Ge X, Land SM. Scaffolding students' problem-solving processes in an ill-structured task using question prompts and peer interactions. Etr&D Education Technol Res Dev 2003;51:21-38.