Synergy of airborne digital camera and lidar data to map coastal dune vegetation

Journal of Coastal Research

Volumn , Issue SPECIAL ISSUE 53, 2009, Pages 73-82

  Kempeneers, P ^a   Deronde, B ^b   Provoost, S ^c   Houthuys, R ^b  

^a JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE   (Italy)

^b FLEMISH INSTITUTE FOR TECHNOLOGICAL RESEARCH VITO   (Belgium)

^c RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR NATURE AND FOREST INBO   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Digital elevation models; Dunes; Lidar; Mapping; Vegetation classification

Indexed keywords

DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL; DUNE; ERROR ANALYSIS; FOREST ECOSYSTEM; LIDAR; SATELLITE DATA; VEGETATION CLASSIFICATION; VEGETATION COVER; VEGETATION MAPPING;

BELGIUM;

BRYOPHYTA;

EID: 74549126224     PISSN: 07490208     EISSN: 15515036     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2112/SI53-009.1     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. ASPRS, 2004. Guidelines: vertical accuracy reporting for lidar data, version 1.0. Bethesda, Maryland: American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 20p.
2. Bolstad, P. and Lillesand, T., 1992. Rule-based models: flexible integration of satellite imagery and thematic spatial data. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 58, 965-971.
3. Bork, E.W. and Su, J.G., 2007. Integrating lidar data and multispectral imagery for enhanced classification of rangeland vegetation: A meta analysis. Remote Sensing of Environment, 111, 11-24.
4. Camps-valls, G. and Bruzzone, L., 2005. Kernel-based methods for hyperspectral images classification. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 43(6), 1351-1362.
5. Clapham, A.R.; Tutin, T.G., and Moore, D.M., 1989. Flora of the British Isles, 3rd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 688p.
6. Cohen, J., 1960. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37-46.
7. Congalton, R.G., 1991. A review of assessing the accuracy of classification of remotely sensed data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 37, 35-46.
8. De Backer, S.; Kempeneers, P.; Debruyn, W., and Scheunders, P., 2004. Classification of dune vegetation from remotely sensed hyperspectral images. In: Campilho, A. and Kamel, M. (eds.) Image Analysis and Recognition, Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol. 3212. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 497-503.
9. de Lange, R.; van Til, M., and Dury, S., 2004. The use of hyperspectral data in coastal zone vegetation monitoring. EARSeL eProceedings, 3(2), pp. 143-153.
10. Drake, J.B.; Dubayah, R.O.; Clark, D.B.; Knox, R.G.; Blair, J.B., and Hofton, M.A., 2002. Estimation of tropical forest structural characteristics using large-footprint lidar. Remote Sensing of Environment, 79, 305-319.
11. Duda, R.O.; Hart, P.E., and Stork, D.G., 2001. Pattern Classification. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 654p.
12. Hall, F.G.; Botkin, D.B.; Strebel, D.E.; Woods, K.D., and Goetz, S.J., 1991. Large scale patterns of forest succession as determined by remote sensing. Ecology, 72, 628-640.
13. Harding, D.J.; Lefsky, M.A.; Parker, G.G., and Blair, J.B., 2001. Laser altimeter canopy height profiles: Methods and validation for closedcanopy, broadleaf forests. Remote Sensing of Environment, 76, 283-297.
14. Harris, P. and Ventura, S., 1995. The integration of geographic data with remotely sensed imagery to improve classification in an urban area. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 61, 993-998.
15. Hodgson, M.E. and Bresnahan, P., 2004. Accuracy of airborne lidar derived elevation: empirical assessment and error budget. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 70, 331-340.
16. Hodgson, M.E.; Jensen, J.R.; Schmidt, L.; Schill, S., and Davis, B., 2003. An evaluation of LIDAR and IFSAR-derived digital elevation models in leaf on conditions with USGS Level 1 and Level 2 DEMs. Remote Sensing of Environment, 84, 295-308.
17. Hopkinson, C.; Chasmer, L.; Zsigovics, G.I.; Creed, M.S.; Treitz, P., and Maher, R., 2004. Errors in lidar ground elevation and wetland vegetation height estimates. Proceedings of the ISPRS working group VIII/2: Laser scanners for forest and landscape assessment (Freiburg, Germany), pp. 108-113.
18. Hyyppa, J.; Kelle, O.; Lehikoinen, M., and Inkinen, M., 2001. A segmentationbased method to retrieve stem volume estimates from 3-D tree height models produced by laser scanners. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 39(5), 969-975.
19. Kumar, S.; Ghosh, J., and Crawford, M.M., 2001. Best-bases feature extraction algorithms for classification of hyperspectral data. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 39(7), 1368-1379.
20. Landis, J. and Koch, G.G., 1977. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159-174.
21. Leckie, D.; Gougeon, F.; Hill, D.; Quinn, R.; Armstrong, L., and Shreenan, R., 2003. Combined high-density lidar and multispectral imagery for individual tree crown analysis. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 29, 633-649.
22. Lee, D.S. and Shan, J., 2003. Combining lidar elevation data and IKONOS multispectral imagery for coastal classification mapping. Marine Geodesy, 26, 117-127.
23. Magnussen, S.; Eggermont, P., and LaRiccia, V.N., 1999. Recovering tree heights from airborne laser scanner data. Forest Science, 45(3), 407-422.
24. Mather, P.M., 1999. Computer processing of remotely-sensed images, 2nd edition. Chichester, United Kingdom: John Wiley and Sons, 292p.
25. Melgani, F. and Bruzzone, L., 2004. Classification of hyperspectral remotesensing images with support vector machines. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 42(8), 1778-1790.
26. Naesset, E. and Okland, T., 2002. Estimating tree height and tree crown properties using airborne scanning laser in a boreal nature reserve. Remote Sensing of Environment, 79, 105-115.
27. Popescu, S.C.; Wynne, R.H., and Nelson, R.F., 2002. Estimating plot-level tree heights with lidar: local filtering with a canopy-height based variable window size. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 37, 71-95.
28. Riano, D.; Valladares, F.; Condés, S., and Chuvieco, E., 2004. Estimation of leaf area index and covered ground from airborne laser scanner (Lidar) in two contrasting forests. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 124, 269-275.
29. Rice, S.O., 1945. Mathematical analysis of random noise-conclusion. Bell Systems Technical Journal, 24, 46-156.
30. Rottensteiner, F.; Trinder, J.; Clode, S., and Kubik, K., 2007. Building detection by fusion of airborne laser scanner data and multi-spectral images: Performance evaluation and sensitivity. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 62, 135-149.
31. Schmidt, K.S.; Skidmore, A.K.; Kloosterman, E.H.; van Oosten, H.; Kumar, L., and Janssen, J., 2004. Mapping coastal vegetation using an expert system and hyperspectral imagery. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 70, 703-715.
32. Sijbers, J.; den Dekker, A.J.; Scheunders, P., and Van Dyck, D.V., 1998. Maximum-likelihood estimation of Rician distribution parameters. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 17(3), 357-361.
33. Sohn, G., and Dowman, I., 2007. Data fusion of high-resolution satellite imagery and lidar data for automatic building extraction. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 62, 43-62.
34. Streuker, D.R. and Genn, N.F., 2006. Lidar measurement of sagebrush steppe vegetation heights. Remote Sensing of Environment, 102, 1135-1145
35. Töyrä, J. and Pietroniro, A., 2005. Towards operational monitoring of a northern wetland using geomatics-based techniques. Remote Sensing of Environment, 97, 174-191.
36. Tueller, P.T., 1989. Remote sensing technology for rangeland management. Journal of Range Management, 42, 442-453.