Dual-plastic hinge design concept for reducing higher-mode effects on high-rise cantilever wall buildings

Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics

Volumn 38, Issue 12, 2009, Pages 1359-1380

  Panagiotou, Marios ^a   Restrepo, José I ^b  

^a Berkeley   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Capacity design; High rise buildings; Higher mode effects; Near fault earthquakes; Plastic hinges; Reinforced concrete; Seismic design; Structural walls; Tall buildings

Indexed keywords

APARTMENT HOUSES; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; BUILDING MATERIALS; CONCRETE BUILDINGS; DESIGN; EARTHQUAKES; HINGES; NANOCANTILEVERS; REINFORCED CONCRETE; SEISMIC DESIGN; TALL BUILDINGS; WALLS (STRUCTURAL PARTITIONS);

CAPACITY DESIGN; HIGH RISE BUILDING; HIGHER-MODE EFFECTS; NEAR-FAULT EARTHQUAKE; PLASTIC HINGES; STRUCTURAL WALLS;

PLASTICS;

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN; GROUND MOTION; REINFORCED CONCRETE; SEISMIC DESIGN; SEISMIC RESPONSE; SHAKING TABLE TEST; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE; WALL;

EID: 74549125755     PISSN: 00988847     EISSN: 10969845     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.905     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Derecho AT, Iqbal M, Ghosh SK, Fintel M, Corley WG, Scanlon A. Structural walls in earthquake-resistant buildings dynamic analysis of isolated structural walls development of design procedure-design force levels. Portland Cement Association (PCA) R & D Serial No. 0665, 1981.
2. CEN EC8. Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance. European Committee for Standardization: Brussels, Belgium, 2004.
3. NZS 3101. New Zealand Standard, Part 1-The Design of Concrete Structures. Standards New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand, 2006.
4. CSA Standard A23.3-04. Design of Concrete Structures. Canadian Standard Association: Rexdale, Canada, 2005; 214.
5. Blakeley RWG, Cooney RC, Megget LM. Seismic shear loading at flexural capacity in cantilever wall structures. Bulletin New Zealand National Society Earthquake Engineering 1975; 8:278-290.
6. Paulay T, Priestley MJN. Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete and Masonry Buildings. Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, 1992.
7. Panagiotou M, Restrepo JI, Conte JP. Shake table test of a 7-story full scale reinforced concrete structural wall building slice phase I: rectangular wall. SSRP 07-07 Report, Department of Structural Engineering, University of California at San Diego, 2007.
8. Panneton M, Léger P, Tremblay R. Inelastic analysis of a reinforced concrete shear wall building according to the national building code of Canada 2005. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 2006; 33:854-871.
9. Priestley MJN, Calvi GM, Kowalsky MJ. Displacement Based Seismic Design of Structures. IUSS Press: Pavia, Italy, 2007.
10. ACI 318-05. Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary. ACI Committee 318, Farmington Hills, 2005.
11. Wallace JW, Orakcal K. ACI 318-99 provisions for seismic design of structural walls. ACI Structural Journal 2002; 99(4):499-508.
12. Moehle J, Bozorgnia Y, Yang TY. The tall buildings initiative. Proceedings of the SEAOC Convention, Squaw Creek, CA, 2007; 315-324.
13. Rodríguez ME, Restrepo JI, Carr AJ. Earthquake-induced floor horizontal accelerations in buildings. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2002; 31:693-718.
14. Panagiotou M, Restrepo JI. Lessons learnt from the UCSD full-scale shake table testing on a 7-story residential building slice. Proceedings of the SEAOC Convention, Squaw Creek, CA, 2007; 57-73.
15. Hidalgo PA, Jordan RM, Martinez MP. An analytical model to predict the inelastic seismic behavior of shear-wall, reinforced concrete structures. Engineering Structures 2002; 24:85-98.
16. ABS Consulting. Flash Report on The Niigata-ken Chuetsu-oki Earthquake, Online reference; accessed 2008.
17. ASCE 7-2005. Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. ASCE/SEI 7-05, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, 2006.
18. FEMA 356. Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings. Federal Emergency Management Agency: Washington, DC, 2000.
19. NEHRP. NEHRP Recommended Provisions: Design Examples. Washington, DC, 2006.
20. Panagiotou M, Restrepo JI. Design and computational model for the UCSD 7-story structural wall building slice. SSRP 07-09 Report, Department of Structural Engineering, University of California at San Diego, 2007.
21. Giberson MF. Two nonlinear beams with definitions of ductility. Journal of the Structural Division (ASCE) 1969; 95(ST2):137-157.
22. Hines EM, Restrepo JI, Seible F. Force-displacement characterization of well-confined bridge piers. ACI Structural Journal 2004; 101(4):537-548.
23. Carr AJ. Ruaumoko-A Program for Inelastic Time-History Analysis. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Canterbury, New Zealand, 1998.
24. Chopra AK. Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering. Prentice-Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2001.
25. Park R, Paulay T. Reinforced Concrete Structures. Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, 1975.
26. Eberhard MO, Sozen MA. Member behavior-based method to determine design shear in earthquake-resistant walls. Journal of Structural Engineering 1993; 119(2):619-640.
27. Filiatrault A, D'Aronco D, Tinawi R. Seismic shear demand of ductile cantilever walls: a Canadian code perspective. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 1994; 21:363-376.
28. Rutenberg A, Nsieri E. The seismic shear demand in ductile cantilever wall systems and the EC8 provisions. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 2006; 4:1-21.