Cohen and kinds: A response to nathan nobis

Journal of Applied Philosophy

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 213-217

  Levy, Neil ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL RIGHTS; ARTICLE; BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; PHILOSOPHICAL APPROACH; PHILOSOPHY; SOCIOBIOLOGY; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; PHILOSOPHICAL APPROACH;

ANIMAL RIGHTS; ANIMALS; PHILOSOPHY; SOCIOBIOLOGY; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 7444232706     PISSN: 02643758     EISSN: 14685930     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0264-3758.2004.00274.x     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. N. NOBIS (2004) Carl Cohen’s ‘kind’ arguments FOR animal rights and AGAINST human rights, Journal of Applied Philosophy 21,1, pp. 43–59.
2. C. COHEN (1986) The case for the use of animals in biomedical research, The New England Journal of Medicine 315, 14, p. 866.
3. [4] J. RACHELS (1991) Created from Animals: The Moral Implications of Darwinism (Oxford, Oxford University Press), p. 173
4. J. LAPORTE (2004) Natural Kinds and Conceptual Change (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press), p. 19.
5. J. RAWLS (1971) A Theory of Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1971), pp. 54ff.
6. T. REGAN (1983) The Case for Animal Rights (Berkeley, University of California Press).