EduBingo: Developing a content sample for the one-to-one classroom by the content-first design approach

Educational Technology and Society

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 343-353

  Chang, Sung Bin ^a   Lin, Chi Jen ^b   Ching, Emily ^a   Cheng, Hercy N H ^a   Chang, Ben ^c   Chen, Fei Ching ^a   Wu, Denise ^a   Chan, Tak Wai ^a  

^a NATIONAL CENTRAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b FO GUANG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^c NATIONAL CHIAYI UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Bingo game; Content first design; One to one classroom; Procedural fluency; Technology enhanced learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 74349126546     PISSN: 11763647     EISSN: 14364522     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Abowd, G. D. (1999). Classroom 2000: an experiment with the instrumentation of a living educational environment. IBM Systems Journal, 38(4), 508-530.
2. Anderson, R. J., Anderson, R., VanDegrift, T., Wolfman, S. A., & Yasuhara, K. (2003). Promoting interaction in large classes with computer-mediated feedback. In Wasson, B., Ludvigsen, S., & Hoppe, U. (Eds.) International Conference of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning 2003, Bergen, Norway, 119-123.
3. Chan, T. W., Roschelle, J., His, S., Kinshuk, Sharples, M., Brown, T., Patton, C., Cherniavsky, J., Pea, R., Norris, C., Soloway, E., Balacheff, N., Scardamalia, M., Dillenbourg, P., Looi, C. K., Milrad, M., Hoppe, U., & G1:1 Members (2006). One-to-one technology enhanced learning: An opportunity for global research collaboration. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 1(1), 3-29.
4. Cottrell, R. (2007). The Economist debates archive: Technology in Education, retrieved June 15, 2008 from http://www.economist.com/debate/index.cfm?action=summary&debate_id=1.
5. Delind, L. B. (1984). Bingo: Some Whys and Wherefores of a Popular Pastime. Journal of Popular Culture, 18(2), 149-156.
6. Dick, W. (1996). The Dick and Carey model: Will It Survive the Decade? Educational Technology Research and Development, 44(3), 55-63.
7. Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2001). The Systematic Design of Instruction (5th ed.). New York: Addison-Wesley, Longman.
8. Dufresne, R. J., Gerace, W. J., Leonard, W. J., Mestre, J. P., & Wenk, L. (1996). Classtalk: A classroom communication system for active learning. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 7, 3-47.
9. Gagne, R. M. (1985). The Conditions of Learning and Theory of Instruction. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
10. Gagne, R. M., Briggs, L. J., & Wager, W. W. (1992). Principles of Instructional Design. Texas: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.
11. Gay, G., Stefanone, M., Grace-Martin, M., & Hembrooke, H. (2001). The effects of wireless computing in collaborative learning environments. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 13(2), 257-276.
12. Halverson, R. & Collins, A. (2006). Information technologies and the future of schooling in the United States. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 1(2), 145-156.
13. Huang, C. W., Liang, J. K., & Wang, H. Y., (2001). EduClick: A computer-supported formative evaluation system with wireless devices in ordinary classroom. In Lee, C. H. (Ed.) International Conference of Computers in Education (ICCE2001), Seoul, Korea, 1462-1469.
14. Hussey, T., & Smith, P. (2002). The trouble with learning outcomes. Active Learning in Higher Education, 3(3), 220-233.
15. Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1998). Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
16. Koper, R. (2006). Current Research in learning Design. Educational Technology & Society, 9(1), 13-22.
17. Koper, R. & Tattersall, C. (2005). Learning Design: A handbook on modeling and delivering networked education and training. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
18. Liu, T. C., Wang, H.Y., Liang, J. K., Chan, T.W., Ko, H. W., & Yang, J. C. (2003). Wireless and mobile technologies to enhance teaching and learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19(3), 371-382.
19. McLeod, D. (1992). Research on affect in Mathematics Education: a reconceptualization. In Douglas. A. Grows (Ed.) Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning, New York, Macmillan Publishing Company.
20. Molenda, M. (2003). In search of the elusive ADDIE model. Performance Improvement, 42(5), 34-36.
21. Morganett, L. (1991). Good teacher-student relationships: A key element in classroom motivation and management. Education, 112(21), 260-264.
22. National Research Council. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. In J. Kilpatrick, J. Swafford, and B. Findell (Eds.) Mathematics Learning Study Committee, Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
23. Paley, A. R. (2007). Software's Benefits On Tests In Doubt. Study Says Tools Don't Raise Scores. Retrieved December 31, 2008, from http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/04/AR2007040402715.html.
24. Pigford, T. (2001). Improving teacher-student relationships: What's up with that? Clearing House, 74, 337-339.
25. Prensky, M. (2000). Digital game-based learning. New York: McGraw Hill.
26. Roschelle, J., Penuel, W. R., & Abrahamson, L. (2004). The networked classroom. Educational Leadership, 61(5), 50-54.
27. Sabelli, N. & Dede, C. (2001). Integrating educational research and practice. Reconceptualizing goals and policies: "How to make what works, work for us?". Retrieved December 31, 2008, from http://www.virtual.gmu.edu/ss_research/cdpapers/policy.pdf
28. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(1), 4-14.
29. Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22.
30. Snowden, R. (1986). Gambling Times Guide to Bingo, Gambling Times.
31. Zurita, G. & Nussbaum, M. (2004). Computer supported collaborative learning using wirelessly interconnected handheld computers. Computers & Education, 42, 289-314.