On Saints and superheroes: Testing paulhus model of social desirability;O Svecima i Superherojima: Provjera pau Lhusova Modela Socijalne Poželjnosti

Drustvena Istrazivanja

Volumn 18, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 977-997

  Galič, Zvonimir ^a,d   Jerneič, Željko ^a,d   Belavič, Marija ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZAGREB   (Croatia)

^b Dekra Zapošljavanje Doo ^*  (Croatia)

^c Dekra Employment Ltd   (Croatia)

^d Philosophische Fakultat   (Croatia)

Author keywords

Egoistic bias; Moralistic bias; Personality; Socially desirable responding

Indexed keywords

EID: 74349125417     PISSN: 13300288     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Carmines, E. G. i Zeller, R. A. (1979.), Reliability and validity of assessment, Beverly Hills, CA, Sage.
2. Cohen, J. (1988.), Statistical power for the behavioral sciences, Hillsdale, NJ, Erlbaum.
3. Crowne, D. P. i Marlowe, D. (1960.), A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology, Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24: 349-354.
4. Dilchert, S., Ones, D. S., Viswesvaran, C. i Deller, J. (2006.), Response distortion in personality measurement: Born to deceive, yet capable of providing valid self-assessments?, Psychology Science, 48: 209-225.
5. Eysenck, H. J. i Eysenck, S. B. G. (1968.), A factorial study of psyhoticism as a dimension of personality, Multivariate Behavioral Research, Special Issue: 15-32.
6. Galić, Z. i Jerneić, Ž. (2006.), Socijalno poželjno odgovaranje u različitim motivacijskim kontekstima: Provjera Paulhusovog modela socijalne poželjnosti, Suvremena Psihologija, 9: 155-170.
7. Goldberg, L. R., Johnson, J. A., Eber, H. W., Hogan, R., Ashton, M. C., Cloinger, C. R. i Gough, H. G. (2006.), The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures, Journal of Research in Personality, 40: 84-96.
8. Griffith, R. L. i Peterson, M. H. (2006.), A closer examination of applicant faking behavior, Greenwich, CT, Information Age Publishing.
9. Jerneić, Ž., Galić, Z. i Parmač, M. (2007.), Prijevod i adaptacija upitnika Sveobuhvatni upitnik socijalno poželjnog odgovaranja (Comprehensive Inventory of Desirable Responding) autora D. L. Paulhusa, Zagreb, Odsjek za psihologiju Filozofskog fakulteta.
10. Li, A. i Bagger, J. (2007.), The Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding (BIDR): A reliability generalization study, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67: 525-544.
11. McCrae, R. R. i Costa, P. T. (1983.), Social desirability scales: More substance than style, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51: 882-888.
12. McKenzie, J. (1988.), An item-factor analysis of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (EPQ): Will the real personality stand up?, Personality and Individual Differences, 9: 801-810.
13. Paulhus, D. L. (1984.), Two-Component Models of Social Desirable Responding, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46: 598-609.
14. Paulhus, D. L. (1991.), Measurement and control of response bias. U: J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver i L. S. Wrightsman (ur.), Measures of personality and social psychology attitudes (str. 17-59), San Diego, CA, Academic Press.
15. Paulhus, D. L. (1998.), Paulhus deception scales: Manual of the balanced inventory of social desirable responding (BIDR-7), Buffalo/Toronto, Multi Health Systems.
16. Paulhus, D. L. (2002.), Social desirable responding: The evolution of a construct. U: H. I. Brown, D. N. Jackson, D. E. Wiley (ur.), The role of constructs in psychological and educational measurement (str. 49-69), Mahwah NJ, Erlbaum.
17. Paulhus, D. L. (2006.), A Comprehensive Inventory of Desirable Responding (CIDR), poster prezentiran na sastanku organizacije "The Association for Research in Personality" u siječnju 2006., New Orleans.
18. Paulhus, D. L., Bruce, M. N. i Trapnell, P. D. (1995.), Effects of self-presentation strategies on personality profiles and their structure, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21: 100-108.
19. Paulhus, D. L. i Reid, D. B. (1991.), Enhancement and denial in social desirable responding, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60: 307-317.
20. Paulhus, D. L. i John, O. P. (1998.), Egoistic and moralistic bias in self-perception: The interplay of self-deceptive styles with basic traits and motives, Journal of Personality, 66: 1025-1060.
21. Pauls, C. A. i Crost, N. W (2004.), Effects of faking on self deception and impression management scales, Personality and Individual Differences, 37: 1137-1151.
22. Pauls, C. A. i Crost, N. W. (2005.), Effects of different instructional sets on the construct validity of the NEO-PI-R, Personality and Individual Differences, 39: 297-308.
23. Pauls, C. A. i Stemmler, G. (2003.), Substance and bias in social desirability responding, Personality and Individual Differences, 35: 263-275.
24. Reid-Seiser, H. L. i Fritzsche, B. A. (2001.), The usefulness of the NEO PI-R Positive Presentation Management Scale for detecting response distortion in employment contexts, Personality and Individual Differences, 31: 639-650.
25. Rosse, J. G., Stecher, M. D., Miller, J. L. i Levin, R. A. (1998.), The impact of preemployment personality testing and hiring decisions, Journal of Applied Psychology, 83: 634-644.
26. Stöber, J., Dette, D. E. i Musch, J. (2002.), Comparing continuous and dichotomous scoring of the Balanced Inventory of Social Desirable Responding, Journal of Personality Assessment, 78: 370-389.