Effects of faking on self-deception and impression management scales

Personality and Individual Differences

Volumn 37, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 1137-1151

  Pauls, Cornelia A ^a   Crost, Nicolas W ^a  

^a PHILIPPS UNIVERSITY MARBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Faking instructions; Impression management; Self deceptive enhancement; Social desirability

Indexed keywords

EID: 4544347988     PISSN: 01918869     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2003.11.018     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Anderson N.H. Likableness ratings of 555 personality-trait words Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 9 1968 272-279
2. Baumeister R.F. Tice D.M. & Hutton D.G. Self-presentational motivations and personality differences in self-esteem Journal of Personality 57 1989 547-579
3. Borkenau P. & Ostendorf F. NEO-Fünf-Faktoren Inventar (NEO-FFI) [NEO Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI)] 1993 Hogrefe Göttingen
4. Cattell R.B. Personality and mood by questionnaire 1973 Jossey-Bass San Francisco, CA
5. Costa P.T. & McCrae R.R. NEO-PI-R professional manual: revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI) 1992 Psychological Assessment Resources Odessa, FLA
6. Cruse D.B. Social desirability scale values of personal concepts Journal of Applied Psychology 49 1965 342-344
7. Derakshan N. & Eysenck M.W. Are repressors self-deceivers or other-deceivers? Cognition and Emotion 13 1999 1-17
8. Dunlap W.P. Cortina J.M. Vaslow J.B. & Burke M.J. Meta-analysis of experiments with matched groups or repeated measures designs Psychological Methods 1 1996 170-177
9. Dunnett S. Koun S. & Barber P.J. Social desirability in the Eysenck Personality Inventory 17 1981 19-26
10. Edwards A.L. The relationship between the judged desirability of a trait and the probability that the trait will be endorsed Journal of Applied Psychology 37 1953 90-93
11. Ellingson J.E. Sackett P.R. & Hough L.M. Social desirability corrections in personality measurement: issues of applicant comparison and construct validity Journal of Applied Psychology 84 1999 155-166
12. Holden R.R. Starzyk K.B. McLeod L.D. & Edwards M.J. Comparisons among the Holden Psychological Screening Inventory (HPSI), the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI), and the Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding (BIDR) Assessment 7 2000 163-175
13. John O.P. & Robins R.W. Accuracy and bias in self-perception: individual differences in self-enhancement and the role of narcissism Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 66 1994 206-219
14. Leary M.R. Self-presentation: Impression management and interpersonal behaviour 1995 Brown and Benchmark Publishers Madison, WI
15. Lück H.E. & Timaeus E. Skalen zur Messung manifester Angst (MAS) und sozialer Wünschbarkeit (SDS-E und SDS-CM) [Scales for the assessment of manifest anxiety (MAS) and social desirability (SDS-E and SDS-CM)] Diagnostica 15 1969 134-137
16. Mersman J.L. & Shultz K.S. Individual differences in the ability to take on personality measures Personality Individual Differences 24 1998 217-227
17. Michaelis W. & Eysenck H.J. The determination of personality inventory factor patterns and intercorrelations by changes in real-life motivation Journal of Genetic Psychology 118 1971 223-234
18. Morf C.C. & Rhodewalt F. Unraveling the paradoxes of narcissism: a dynamic self-regulatory processing model Psychological Inquiry 12 2001 177-196
19. Olkin I. Correlations revisited In: Stanley J.C. (Eds.) Improving experimental design and statistical analysis 1967 102-128 Rand McNally Chicago
20. Paulhus D.L. Two-component models of socially desirable responding Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 46 1984 598-609
21. Paulhus D.L. Measurement and control of response bias In: Robinson J.P. Shaver P.R. (Eds.) Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes Measures of social psychological attitudes Vol. 1 1991 17-59 Academic Press San Diego, CA
22. Paulhus D.L. Interpersonal and intrapsychic adaptiveness of trait self-enhancement: a mixed blessing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74 1998 1197-1208
23. Paulhus D.L. Paulhus deception scales: Manual of the balanced inventory of social desirable responding (BIDR-7) 1998 Multi-Health Systems Buffalo/Toronto
24. Paulhus D.L. Socially desirable responding: the evolution of a construct In: Braun H.I. Jackson D.N. (Eds.) The role of constructs in psychological and educational measurement 2002 49-69 Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers Mahwah, NJ
25. Paulhus D.L. Bruce M.N. & Trapnell P.D. Effects of self-presentation strategies on personality profiles and their structure Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 21 1995 100-108
26. Paulhus D.L. & John O.P. Egoistic and moralistic biases in self-perception: the interplay of self-deceptive styles with basic traits and motives Journal of Personality 66 1998 1025-1060
27. Pauls C.A. & Stemmler G. Substance and bias in social desirable responding Personality and Individual Differences 35 2003 263-275
28. Reid-Seiser H.L. & Fritzsche B.A. The usefulness of the NEO PI-R Positive Presentation Management scale for detecting response distortion in employment contexts Personality and Individual Differences 31 2001 639-650
29. Sackeim H.A. & Gur R.C. Self-deception, self-confrontation and consciousness In: Schwartz G.E. Shapiro D. (Eds.) Consciousness and self-regulation: Advances in research Vol. 2 1978 139-197 Plenum New York
30. Steiger J.H. Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix Psychological Bulletin 87 1980 245-251
31. Stöber J. Dette D.E. & Musch J. Comparing continuous and dichotomous scoring of the Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding Journal of Personality Assessment 78 2002 370-389
32. Stokes G.S. Hogan J.B. & Snell A.F. Comparability of incumbent and applicant samples for the development of biodata keys: the influence of social desirability Personnel Psychology 46 1993 739-762
33. Viswesvaran C. & Ones D.S. Meta-analyses of fakability estimates: implications for personality measurement Educational and Psychological Measurement 59 1999 197-210
34. Wallace H.M. & Baumeister R.F. The performance of narcissists rises and falls with perceived opportunity for glory Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 82 2002 819-834
35. Weinberger D.A. The construct validity of the repressive coping style In: Singer J.L. (Eds.) Repression and dissociation: Implications for personality theory, psychopathology, and health 1990 337-386 University of Chicago Press Chicago, IL
36. Wiggins J.S. Interrelationships among MMPI measures of dissimulation under standard and social desirability instruction Journal of Consulting Psychology 23 1959 419-427