Water relations and organic solutes production in four umbu tree (Spondias tuberosa genotypes under intermittent drought;Relações hídricas e acúmulo de solutos orgânicos em quatro genótipos de umbuzeiro sob seca intermitente

Brazilian Journal of Plant Physiology

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 43-53

  Silva, Elizamar C ^a   Nogueira, Rejane J M C ^a   Vale, Fernando H A ^b   de Melo, Natoniel F ^c   de Araújo, Francisco P ^c  

^a UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL RURAL DE PERNAMBUCO   (Brazil)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF MINAS GERAIS   (Brazil)

^c EMBRAPA SEMIÁRIDO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Carbohydrates; Proline; Spondias tuberosa; Water potential

Indexed keywords

SPONDIAS TUBEROSA;

EID: 74349115999     PISSN: 16770420     EISSN: 16779452     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/s1677-04202009000100006     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Améglio T, Archer P, Cohen M, Valancogne C, Daudet FA, Dayau S, Cruiziat P (1999) Significance and limits in the use of predawn leaf water potential for tree irrigation. Plant Soil. 207:155-167.
2. Ashraf M, Harris PJC (2004) Potential biochemical indicators of salinity tolerance in plants. Plant Sci. 166: 3-16.
3. Ashraf M, Foolad M R (2007) Roles of glycine betaine and proline in improving plant abiotic stress resistance. Environ. Exp. Bot. 59:206-216.
4. Bates LS, Waldren RP, Teare ID (1973) Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant Soil. 39:205-207.
5. Bohnert HJ, Shen B (1999) Transformation and compatible solutes. Sci. Hort. 78:237-260.
6. Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantification of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principles of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 72:246-254.
7. Bucci SJ, Scholz FG, Goldstein G, Meinzer FC, Franco AC, Zhang Y, Hao GY (2008) Water relations and hydraulic architecture in Cerrado trees: adjustments to seasonal changes in water availability and evaporative demand. Braz. J. Plant Physiol. 20:233-245.
8. Chartzoulakis K, Patakas A, Bosabalidis AM (1999) Changes in water relations, photosynthesis and leaf anatomy induced by intermittent drought in two olive cultivars. Environ. Exp. Bot. 42:113-120.
9. Charzoulakis K, Patakas A, Kofidis G, Bosabalidis A, Nastou A (2002) Water stress affects leaf anatomy, gas exchange, water relations and growth of two avocado cultivars. Sci. Hort. 95:39-50.
10. Dubois M, Gilles KA, Hamilton JK, Rebers PA, Smith F (1956) Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal. Chem. 28:350-356.
11. Farooq M, Wahid A, Kobayashi N, Fujita D, Basra SMA (2009) Plant drought stress: effects, mechanisms and management. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 29:185-212.
12. Frank PJ, Drake PL, Froend RH (2007) Anisohydric but isohydrodynamic: seasonally constant plant water potential gradient explained by a stomatal control mechanism incorporating variable plant hydraulic conductance. Plant Cell Environm. 30:19-30.
13. Gindaba J, Rozanov A, Negash L (2005) Photosynthetic gas exchange, growth and biomass allocation of two Eucalyptus and three indigenous tree species of Ethiopia under moisture deficit. Forest Ecol. Manag. 205:127-138.
14. Haines WB (1930) Studies in the physical properties of soil. V. The hysteresis effect in capillary properties, and the modes of moisture distribution associated therewith. J. Agric. Sci. 10:96-105.
15. Hong-Bo F, Xiao-yan C, Li-ye C., Xi-Ling Z., Gang W, Yong-Bing Y, Chang-Xing Z, Zan-Min H. (2006) Investigation on the relationship of proline with wheat anti-drought under soil water deficits. Coll. Surf. B. 53:113-119.
16. Jones MM., Osmond CB, Turner NC (1980) Accumulation of solutes in leaves of sorghum and sunflower in response to water deficit. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 7:193-205.
17. Lima Filho JMP (2001) Internal water relations of the umbu tree under semi- arid conditions. Rev. Bras. Frutic. 23:518-521.
18. Lima Filho JMP (2004) Gas exchange of the umbu tree under semi-arid conditions. Rev. Bras. Frutic. 26:206-208.
19. Nogueira RJMC, Moraes JAPM, Burity HA, Bezerra Neto E (2001) Alterações na resistência à difusão de vapor das folhas e relações hídricas em aceroleiras submetidas a déficit de água. Rev. Bras. Fisiol. Veg. 13:75-87.
20. Nogueira RJMC, Albuquerque MB, Silva EC (2005) Aspectos ecofisiológicos da tolerância à seca em plantas da caatinga. In: Nogueira RJMC, Araújo EL, Willadino LG, Cavalcante UMT (eds), Estresses ambientais: danos e benefícios em plantas, pp 22-31, Imprensa Universitária da UFRPE, Recife, Brasil.
21. Nogueira RJMC, Silva EC, Sousa EB, Silva MAV, Silva MA, Martins MO (2008) Variabilidade do grau de tolerância à seca em fruteiras tropicais cultivadas no Nordeste. In: Moura NA, Araújo EL, Albuquerque UP (eds), Biodiversidade, potencial econômico e processos ecofisiológicos em ecossistemas nordestinos, pp 302-328, Comunigraf, Recife, Brasil.
22. Oliveira VR, Resende MEV, Nascimento CES, Drumond MA, Santos CAF (2004) Genetic variability of provenances and progenies of umbu tree by mixed linear model methodology (REML/BLUP). Rev. Bras. Frutic. 26: 53-56.
23. Pagter M, Bragato C, Brix H (2005) Tolerance and physiological responses of Phragmites australis to water stress. Aquatic Bot. 81:285-299.
24. Pimentel C (2004) A Relação da Planta com a Água. Seropédica, Rio de Janeiro.
25. Quezada RAP, Ontiveros JLR, Hernández VAG (1999) Transpiracion, potencial hídrico y prolina em zarzamora bajo déficit hídrico. Terra. 17:125-130.
26. Rabe E (1990) Stress physiology: the functional significance of the accumulation of nitrogen-containing compounds. J. Hortic. Sci. 65:231-243.
27. Santos CAF, Nascimento CES, Oliveira MC (1999) Recursos genéticos do umbuzeiro: preservação, utilização e abordagem metodológica. In: Queiróz MA, Goedert CO, Ramos SRR (eds). Recursos genéticos e melhoramento de plantas do Nordeste brasileiro (on-line). Versão 1.0. Petrolina-PE. EMBRAPA Semi-Árido/Brasília-DF: Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia. Nov, 1999. Disponível em: http://www.cpatsa.embrapa.br/livrorg/umbuzeiro.doc. Acesso em 24 ago. 2003.
28. Sarker BC, Hara M, Uemura M (2005) Proline synthesis, physiological responses and biomass yield of eggplants during and after repetitive soil moisture stress. Sci. Hort.103:387-402.
29. Silva EC, Nogueira RJMC, Azevedo Neto AD, Santos VF (2003) Comportamento estomático e potencial da água da folha em três espécies lenhosas cultivadas sob estresse hídrico. Acta Bot. Bras. 17:231-246.
30. Silva EC, Nogueira RJMC, Azevedo Neto AD, Brito JZ, Cabral EL (2004) Aspectos ecofisiológicos de dez espécies em uma área de caatinga no município de Cabaceiras, Paraíba, Brasil. Iheringia, Sér. Bot. 59:201-205.
31. Sircelj H, Tausz M, Grill D, Batic F (2005) Biochemical responses in leaves of two apple tree cultivars subjected to progressing drought. J. Plant Physiol. 162:1308-1318.
32. Slatyer RO (1967) Plant-water relationships, Academic, New york.
33. Souza CR, Maroco, JP, Santos TP, Rodríguez ML, Lopes, C, Pereira JS, Chaves, MM (2005) Control of stomatal aperture and carbon uptake by deficit irrigation in two gravepines cultivars. Agricult. Ecosys. Environ. 106:261-274.
34. Steudle E, Peterson CA (1998) How does water get through roots? J. Exp. Bot. 49:775-788.
35. Taiz L, Zeiger E (2004) Plant Physiology, 3rd ed. Sinauer Associates Inc., Massachusetts.
36. Tardieu F, Simonneau T (1998) Variability among species of stomatal control under fluctuating soil water status and evaporative demand: modelling isohydric and anisohydric behaviours. J. Exp. Bot. 49:419-432.
37. yemm EW, Cocking EC (1955) Determination of amino acids with ninhydrin. Analyst, 80:209-213.
38. Zhu X, Gong H, Chen G, Wang S, Zhang C (2005) Different solute levels in two spring wheat cultivars induced by progressive field water stress at different developmental stages. J. Arid Environ. 62:1-14.