Sustainable natural resource management and environmental assessment in the Salt Lake (Tuz Golu) Specially Protected Area

Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

Volumn 161, Issue 1-4, 2010, Pages 327-342

  Dengiz, Orhan ^a   Ozcan, Hesna ^b   Koksal, E Selim ^b   Baskan, Oguz ^b   Kosker, Yakup ^b  

^a ONDOKUZ MAYIS UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b Agricultural Ministry   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Environmental assessment; GIS and RS; Land evaluation; Natural resource management; Salt Lake (Tuz Golu)

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL ACTIVITIES; AGRICULTURAL USE; ALTERNATIVE MANAGEMENT; DECISION MAKERS; ECOLOGICAL CONDITIONS; ECOLOGICAL FACTORS; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS; GIS ANALYSIS; IRRIGATION PRACTICES; LAND EVALUATION; LAND SUITABILITY; LAND-USE STRATEGIES; MANAGEMENT PRACTICES; NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; PESTICIDE POLLUTION; PRODUCTION YIELD; PROTECTED AREAS; REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT; SALT LAKES; STUDY AREAS;

DEGRADATION; ECOSYSTEMS; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; HEAVY METALS; HEAVY WATER; LAKES; LAND USE; NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT; PESTICIDES; RAPID SOLIDIFICATION; REGIONAL PLANNING; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; SOILS; STRATEGIC PLANNING; WATER ANALYSIS; WATER POLLUTION; WATER QUALITY;

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION;

CROP YIELD; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; GIS; LAND EVALUATION; LAND USE PLANNING; NATURAL RESOURCE; PROTECTED AREA; REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT; REMOTE SENSING; RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

AGRICULTURAL LAND; AGRICULTURAL MANAGEMENT; ARTICLE; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM; LAND USE; SOIL ANALYSIS; SOIL POLLUTION; TURKEY (REPUBLIC);

CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; GEOGRAPHY; TURKEY;

TURKEY; TUZ LAKE;

EID: 74349108807     PISSN: 01676369     EISSN: 15732959     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-009-0749-4     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Allen, R. G., Pereira, L. S., Raes, D., & Smith, M. (1998). Crop evapotranspiration guidelines for computing crop water requirement (300 p.). FAO irrigation and drainage paper 56, Rome.
2. Anonymous (1990). Analytical for atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Norwalk: Perkin Elmer.
3. Aronoff, S. (1989). Geographic information system: A management perspective. Ottawa: WLD.
4. R. Barandela 1997 Geographic information systems and environmental assessment: Difficulties and opportunities International Journal of Aerospace Survey and Earth Sciences. The Netherlands 1 74 78
5. Bayramin, I., & Usul, M. (2004). Physical land evaluation of Salihli right coast irrigation area. International Soil Congress on Natural Resource Management for Sustainable Development, Erzurum-Turkey.
6. K. J. Beek K. De Bie P. Driesses 1997 Land information and land evaluation for land use planning and sustainable land management The Land 1 1 27 44
7. Campbell, J. B. (1987). Introduction to remote sensing. New York: Guilford.
8. O. Dengiz O. Baskan 2009 Land quality assessment and sustainable land use in Salt Lake (Tuz Gölü) specially protected area Journal of Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 148 233 243 10.1007/s10661-008-0154-4 doi:10.1007/s10661-008-0154-4
9. Dogdu, M. S., & Sagnak, C. (2008). Climate change, drought and over pumping impact on groundwaters: Two examples from Turkey. Third International Conference BALWOIS 2008-Orhid. Republic of Macedonia, 27-31 (May).
10. Doorenbos, J., & Kassam, A. H. (1986). Yield response to water (pp. 33-193). FAO irrigation and drainage paper, Rome.
11. Doorenbos, J., & Pruitt, W. O. (1992). Guidelines for predicting crop water requirement (3rd ed.) (pp. 24-193). FAO irrigation and drainage paper, Rome.
12. Eaton, D. A., Cleascerri, L. S., & Greenberg, A. E. (1995). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association.
13. FAO (1977). A framework for land evaluation. International Institute for Land Reclamation and Improvement/ILRI. Publication no. 22, Wageningen, The Netherlands, pp. 87.
14. FAO (1983). Guidelines: Land evaluation for rainfed agriculture soils bulletin 52. Rome: FAO of the UN.
15. FAO (1993). Guideline for land use planning. FAO Development Series No: 1, FAO, Rome, pp. 96.
16. FAO (2004). http://www.fao.org/ag/AGL/AGLW/cropwat.stm.
17. K. Green 1995 Using GIS to predict fire behaviour Journal of Forestry 93 21 25
18. J. C. Hinton 1996 GIS and RS integration for environmental applications International Journal of Geographical Information Systems 10 877 890
19. Isawip (1994). Sustainability of the integrated soil and water improvement project. Experiences in integrated land and water management. In Proceedings of a seminar, Port Said, April 1994. CIDA, Ottawa.
20. Keller, J., & Bliesner, R. D. (1990). Sprinkle and trickle irrigation. Caldwell: Blackburn.
21. Lake-Tuz (2001). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lake-Tuz. Last update.
22. G. Matkeron 1973 The intrinsic random functions and their applications Advances in Applied Probability 5 239 465
23. Patil, A., Prathumchai, K., Samarakoon, L., & Honda, K. (2001). Evaluation of land utilization for regional development, a GIS Approach. In 22nd Asian conference on remote sensing, Singapore.
24. RCSP (2001). Official gazette. Regulation for control of soil pollution. 10.12.2001/24609.
25. RCWP (1991). Official gazette. Regulation for control of water pollution. 7.1.1991/20748.
26. S. Senol 1994 Bilgisayar destekli bir model yardimiyla goksu deltasi topraklarinin tarimsal kullanimina uygunluk siniflamasi Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 18 5 437 443
27. Senol, S., & Tekes, Y. (1995). Arazi degerlendirme ve arazi kullanim planlamasi amaciyla gelistirilmis bir bilgisayar modeli. Turkiye Toprak Ilmi Dernegi. Ilhan Akalan Toprak ve Cevre Sempozyumu. No:7. Cilt 1. Ankara, pp. 204-210 (in Turkish).
28. Soil Survey Division Staff (1993). Soil survey manual. Soil conservation service. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18.
29. Soil Survey Staff (1996). National soil survey center. Soil survey laboratory methods manuals. Soil survey investigation report no: 2, version: 3 January, 1996, National resources conservation service-USDA.
30. Soil Survey Staff (1999). Soil taxonomy. A basic of soil classification for making and interpreting soil survey. National resources conservation service-USDA Handbook No: 436, Washington D.C.
31. J. Throp M. Baldwin 1938 New nomenclature of the higher categories of soil classification as used in the Department of Agriculture Soil Science Society of America Journal 3 160 168
32. TNT (1999). TNT (The new thing) MIPS (MicroImage processing system), getting started geospatial analysis. USA: MicroImages.
33. Ulgen, N., & Yurtseven, N. (1995). Türkiye gübre ve gübreleme rehberi TC basbakanlik KHGM. Toprak ve gübre arastirma enstitüsü müdürlü ü yayinlari genel yayin no. 209, Teknik yayIn no: T: 66, Ankara (in Turkish).
34. U.S. Salinity Laboratory Staff (1954). Diagnosis improvement of Saline and sodic soils. USDA. Handbook 60. U.S. Gov. Printing Office. Washington D.C.
35. M. Vauclin S. R. Vieira G. Vachaud D. R. Nielsen 1983 The use of co-kriging with limited field soil observations Soil Science Society of America Journal 47 175 184
36. S. R. Vieira J. L. Hatfield D. R. Nielson J. W. Biggar 1983 Geostatistical theory and application to variability of some agronomical properties Hilgardia 51 3 1 75
37. J. Wu M. D. Ransom G. J. Kluitenberg M. D. Nellis H. L. Seyler 2001 Land use management using a soil survey geographic database for Finney County, Kansas Soil Science Society of America Journal 65 169 177 1:CAS:528: DC%2BD3MXhvFSltb0%3D