Land quality assessment and sustainable land use in Salt Lake (Tuz Gölü) specially protected area

Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

Volumn 148, Issue 1-4, 2009, Pages 233-243

  Dengiz, Orhan ^a   Baskan, Oǧuz ^b  

^a ONDOKUZ MAYIS UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b Ankara Research Institute   (Turkey)

Author keywords

CORINE; Geographic information systems (GIS); Land quality assessment; Remote sensing (RS); Salt Lake (Tuz G l )

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; CHEMICAL PROPERTIES; DATABASE SYSTEMS; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; GEOLOGIC MODELS; GEOMORPHOLOGY; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; LAKES; LAND USE; RAPID SOLIDIFICATION; REMOTE SENSING; SOILS;

BIODIVERSITY VALUES; CLIMATIC DATUMS; CORINE; DECISION MAKERS; DIGITAL ELEVATION MODELS; FIELD STUDIES; HIGH QUALITIES; HIGH SALT CONCENTRATIONS; LABORATORY ANALYSIS; LAND QUALITY ASSESSMENT; LOW QUALITIES; PROTECTED AREAS; SATELLITE IMAGES; SOIL MAPS; SOIL PARAMETERS; STUDY AREAS;

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION;

BIODIVERSITY; DATABASE; DECISION MAKING; DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL; GIS; LAND USE; PROTECTED AREA; REMOTE SENSING; SALINE LAKE; SATELLITE IMAGERY;

ARTICLE; BIODIVERSITY; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM; LAND USE; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; QUALITY CONTROL; REMOTE SENSING; SOIL ANALYSIS; SOIL PROPERTY; TURKEY (REPUBLIC);

CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; GEOGRAPHY; HUMANS; SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS; SOIL; TURKEY; WATER;

EURASIA; TURKEY; TUZGOLU BASIN;

EID: 58049180207     PISSN: 01676369     EISSN: 15732959     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-008-0154-4     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Aronoffon, S. (1989). Geographic information system: A management perspective. Ottawa, ON, Canada: WLD Publ.
2. Bouma, J. (2002). Land quality indicators of sustainable land management. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment, 88, 129-136.
3. Brejda, J. J., Moorman, T. B., Karlen, D. L., & Dao, T. H. (2000). Identification of regional soil quality factors and indicators: I. Central and southern high-plains. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 64, 2115-2124.
4. Campbell, J. B. (1987). Introduction to remote sensing. New York: The Guilford Press.
5. Chan, K. Y., Bowman, A., & Oates, A. (2001). Oxidizible organic-carbon fractions and soil quality changes in an oxic Paleustalf under different pasture leys. Soil Science, 166, 61-67.
6. Commission of the European Communities (1985). Soil map of the European communities, Luxembourg.
7. Commission of the European Communities (1990). Official journal of the European Communities, L 81, Luxembourg.
8. CORINE (1992). CORINE soil erosion risk and important land resources. Luxembourg: Commission of the European Communities.
9. Duclos, G. (1980). Appréciation de l'aptitude à la mise en Valeur Forestière et Agricole des Zones Accidentées de Provence', Forêt Méditerranéenne Vol. 11, No 1.
10. Green, K. (1995). Using GIS to predict fire behaviour. Journal of Forestry, 93, 21-25.
11. Hinton, J. C. (1996). GIS and RS integration for environmental applications. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 10, 877-890.
12. Lake-Tuz (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lake_Tuz), last update 2001.
13. Larson, W. E., & Pierce, F. J. (1991). Conservation and enhancement of soil quality. Evaluation for sustainable land management in the developing world. Vol. 2. IBSRAM Proc. 12 (2). Bangkok, Thailand. Int. Board Soil Res. Manage., Bangkok, Thailand pp. 175-203.
14. Pennock, D. J., Anderson, D. W., & de Jong, E. (1994). Landscapes-scale change in indicators of soil quality due to cultivation in Saskatchewan, Canada. Geoderma, 64, 1-19.
15. Pieri, C., Dumanski, J., Hamblin, A., & Young, A. (1995). Land quality indicators. World Bank Discussion Papers 315. Washington: World Bank.
16. Rodolfi, G. (1986). Criteri di Conservazione del Suolo per l'incremento Della Produttività Agricola Nelle Aree Marginali Appenniniche Desunti da Un'analisi Pedo-Geomorfologica di Dettaglio, Nota Preliminare (con esemplicificazione cartografica), in Annali dell'Istituto Sperimentale di Studio e Difesa del Suolo (Firenze), vol. 17.
17. Schipper, L. A., & Sparling, G. P. (2000). Performance of soil condition indicators across taxonomic groups and land uses. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 64, 300-311.
18. Seybold, C. A., Mausbach, M. J., Karlen, D. L., & Rogers, H. H. (1997). Quantification of soil quantity. In R. Lar, et al. (Ed.) Soil processes and the carbon cycle (pp. 387-404). Boca Raton, FL: CRC.
19. Soil Survey Staff (1999). Soil taxonomy. A basic of soil classification for making and interpreting soil survey. USDA Handbook No: 436, Washington, DC.
20. Southorn, N., & Cattle, S. (2000). Monitoring soil quality for central tablelands grazing systems. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 31, 2211-2229.
21. TNT (1999). TNT (The New Thing) MIPS (MicroImage Processing System), getting started geospatial analysis, MicroImages, USA.
22. Wander, M. M., & Bollero, G. A. (1999). Soil quality assessment of tillage impacts in Illinois. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 63, 961-971.
23. Wang, X., & Gong, Z. (1998). Assessment and analysis of soil quality changes after eleven years of reclamation in subtropical China. Geoderma, 81, 339-355.
24. Webb, K. T., Wang, C., Astatkie, T., & Langille, D. R. (2000). Spatial and temporal trends in soil properties at a soil quality benchmark site in central Nova-Scotia. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 80, 567-575.
25. Yassoglou, N., Nychas, A., Apostolakis, G., & Kosmas, C. (1983). Soil survey report of Argos plain, Larissa, Ministry of Agriculture, Soil Survey Institute.