The phonology of second occurrence focus

Journal of Linguistics

Volumn 45, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 285-313

  Fry, Caroline ^a   Ishihara, Shinichiro ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF POTSDAM   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 74349095731     PISSN: 00222267     EISSN: 14697742     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0022226709005702     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Bartels, Christine. 2004. Acoustic correlates of 'second occurrence' focus: Towards an experimental investigation. In Kamp & Partee (eds.), 354-361.
2. Beaver, David, B. Brady Zack Clark, Edward Flemming, T. Florian Jaeger & Maria Wolters. 2007. When semantics meets phonetics: Acoustical studies of second occurrence focus. Language 83, 245-276.
3. Boersma, Paul & Weenink, David. 1994-2009. Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 4.4.20) [Computer program]. http://www.praat.org/ (retrieved in 2004).
4. Bosch, Peter & Rob van der Sandt (eds.). 1999. Focus: Linguistic, cognitive, and computational perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Büring, Daniel. 2006. Been there, marked that: A tentative theory of second occurrence focus. Ms., UCLA.
6. Fanselow, Gisbert & Stefan Frisch. 2005. Effects of processing difficulty on judgements of acceptability. In Gisbert Fanselow, Caroline Féry, Ralph Vogel & Matthias Schlesewsky (eds.), Gradience in grammar: Generative perspectives, 291-316. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7. Féry, Caroline & Shinichiro Ishihara. 2009. How syntax and information structure shape prosody. In Zimmermann & Féry (eds.), 36-63.
8. Féry, Caroline & Frank Kü gler. 2008. Pitch accent scaling on given, new and focused constituents in German. Journal of Phonetics 36, 680-703.
9. Féry, Caroline & V. Samek-Lodovici. 2006. Focus projection and prosodic prominence in nested foci. Language 82.1, 131-150.
10. Fintel, Kai von. 2004. A minimal theory of adverbial quantification. In Kamp & Partee (eds.), 137-175.
11. Ishihara, Shinichiro. 2004. Prosody by phase: Evidence from the focus intonation-wh-scope correspondence in Japanese. In Shinichiro Ishihara, Michaela Schmitz & Anne Schwarz (eds.), Interdisciplinary studies on information structure (Working Papers of the SFB 632, vol. 1), 77-119. Potsdam: University of Potsdam.
12. Ishihara, Shinichiro & Caroline Féry. 2006. Phonetic correlates of second occurrence focus. In Chris Davis, Amy Rose Deal & Youri Zabbal (eds.), North East Linguistic Society (NELS) 36, 371-384. Amherst, MA: GLSA.
13. Jackendoff, Ray S. 1972. Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14. Jaeger, T. Florian. 2004. Only always associates audibly, even if only is repeated: The prosodic properties of second occurrence focus in English. Ms., Stanford University.
15. Kamp, Hans & Barbara H. Partee (eds.). 2004. Context-dependence in the analysis of linguistic meaning. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
16. Kohler, Klaus J. 1990. Macro and micro F0 in the synthesis of intonation. In John Kingston & Mary E. Beckman (eds.), Papers in Laboratory Phonology I : Between the grammar and the physics of speech, 115-138. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Krifka, Manfred. 2004. Focus and/or context: A second look at second occurrence expressions. In Kamp & Partee (eds.), 187-207.
18. Partee, Barbara Hall. 1999. Focus, quantification, and semantics-pragmatics issues. In Bosch & van der Sandt (eds.), 213-231.
19. Pierrehumbert, Janet B. 1980. The phonology and phonetics of English intonation. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
20. Rooth, Mats. 1992. A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 1, 75-116.
21. Rooth, Mats. 1996. On the interface principles for intonational focus. In Teresa Galloway & Justin Spence (eds.), Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) VI, 202-226. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications, Cornell University.
22. Rooth, Mats. 1999. Association with focus or association with presupposition? In Bosch & van der Sandt (eds.), 232-244.
23. Rooth, Mats. 2004. Comments on Krifka's paper. In Kamp & Partee (eds.), 475-487.
24. Rooth, Mats. 2009. Second occurrence focus and relativized stress F. In Zimmermann & Féry (eds.), 15-35.
25. Sugahara, Mariko. 2003. Downtrends and post-FOCUS intonation in Japanese. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
26. Uhmann, Susanne. 1991. Fokusphonologie: Eine Analyse deutscher Intonationskonturen im Rahmen der nicht-linearen Phonologie. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
27. Zimmerman, Malte & Caroline Féry (eds.). 2009. Information structure from different perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.