Tomosynthesis: Luxury or necessity?;Tomosynthèse: Luxe ou nécessité

Journal de Radiologie

Volumn 90, Issue 12, 2009, Pages 1813-1821

  Taourel, P ^a   Merigeaud, S ^a   Aubert, E ^a   Millet, I ^a   Curros Doyon, F ^a   Lacroix, J ^a   Prat, X ^a   Pujol, J ^a  

^a LAPEYRONIE HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

Mammography; Tomosynthesis

Indexed keywords

BREAST TUMOR; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; HUMAN; IMAGING SYSTEM; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAMMOGRAPHY; REVIEW; TUMOR DIAGNOSIS;

EID: 74249107353     PISSN: 02210363     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0221-0363(09)73587-5     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Poplack SP, Tosteson AN, Grove MR, Wells WA, Carney PA. Mammography in 53,803 women from the New Hampshire Mammography Network. Radiology 2000; 217:832-40.
2. Carney PA, Miglioretti DL, Yankaskas BC et al. Indidual and combined effects of age, breasst density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography. Ann Intern Med 2003;138:168-75.
3. Elmore JG, Barton MB, Moceri VM, Polk S, Arena JP, Fletecher SW. Ten years risk of false positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations. N Engl J Med 1998;338:1089-96.
4. Pisani NEJM
5. Park JM, Franken EA, Gard M, Fajardo LL, Niklason LT. Breast tomosynthesis: present considerations and future applications. Radiographics 2007;27:S231-S240.
6. Lewin JM, Niklason L. Advanced applications of digital mammography: tomosynthesis and contrast-enhanced digital mammography. Seminars in Roentgenology 2007; 243-51.
7. Schulz-Wendtland R, FuchsjÄger M, Wacker T, Hermann KP. Digital mammography: an update. Eur J Radiol 2009 article in press.
8. Diekmann F, Bick U. Tomosynthesis and contrast-enhanced digital mammography: recent advances in digital mammography. Eur Radiol 2007;17:3086-92.
9. Rafferty EA. Digital mammography: novel applications. Radiol Clin N Am 2007; 45:831-43.
10. Good WF, Abrams GS, Catullo VJ et al. Digital breast tomosynthesis: a pilot observer study. AJR 2008;190:865-9.
11. Saunders RS, Samei E, Lo Jy, Baker JA. Can compression be reduced for breast tomosynthesis? Monte carlo study on mass and microcalcification conspicuity in tomosynthesis. Radiology 2009;251: 673-82.
12. Rafferty EA, Nicklason LT, Jameson-Meehan L. Breast tomosynthesis: one view or two? In abstracts of the 92nd scientific assembly and annual meeting of the radiological society of North America. Chicago 2006.
13. Rafferty EA, Kopans DB, Georgian-Smith D et al. Comparison of full-field digital tomosynthesis and conventional two view film screen mammography in lesion detection and assessment of lesion conspicuity. In: Abstracts of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Roentgen Ray Society. San Diego (CA), May 4-9, 2003.
14. Thibault F, Malhaire C, Athanasiou A, Ollivier L, Tardivon A, El Khoury C. Tomosynthèse : principe et applications. Imagerie de la femme 2009;19-136-9.
15. Poplack SP, Tosteson TD, Kogel CA, Nagy HM. Digital breast tomosynthesis: initial experience in 98 women with abnormal digital screening mammography. AJR 2007;189:616-23.
16. Rafferty EA, Nicklason L, Halpern E et al. Assesing radiologist performance using combined full-field digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography alone: results of a multi-center, multi-reader trial. Presented at RSNA 2007? Session SSE26-02. Late breaking multi-center clinical trials.
17. Gur D, Abrams GS, Chough DM et al. Digital breast tomosynthesis: observer performance study. AJR 2009;193:586-91.
18. Anderson I, Ikeda DM, Zackrisson S et al. Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a comparison of breast cancer visibility and BIRADS classification in a population of cancers with subtle mammographic findings. Eur Radiol 2008;18:2817-25
19. Gur David. Tomosynthesis: potential clinical role in breast imaging. AJR 2007; 189:614-5.
20. Chan HP, Wei J, Sahiner B et al. Computer-aided detection system for breast masses on digital tomosynthesis mammograms: preliminary experience. Radiology 2005; 237:1075-80.