Authors' response

Journal of Forensic Sciences

Volumn 55, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 269-272

  Budowle, Bruce ^a   Chakraborty, Ranajit ^b   Van Daal, Angela ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c BOND UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 74249089471     PISSN: 00221198     EISSN: 15564029     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.01258.x     Document Type: Letter

References (12)

1. Gill P, Buckleton J. Commentary on: Budowle B, Onorato AJ, Callaghan TF, Della Manna A, Gross AM, Guerrieri RA, Luttman JC, McClure DL. Mixture interpretation: defining the relevant features for guidelines for the assessment of mixed DNA profiles in forensic casework. J Forensic Sci 2010 55 : 265 268.
2. Budowle B, Onorato AJ, Callaghan TF, Della Manna A, Gross AM, Guerrieri RA, et al. Mixture interpretation: defining the relevant features for guidelines for the assessment of mixed DNA profiles in forensic casework. J Forensic Sci 2009 54 : 810 821.
3. Gill P. Transcript, NY v Megnath, Indictment No. 917-07. New York : Frye Hearing, December 18-19, 2008.
4. Budowle B, Bottrell MC, Bunch SG, Fram R, Harrison D, Meagher S, et al. A perspective on errors, bias, and interpretation in the forensic sciences and direction for continuing advancement. J Forensic Sci 2009 54 : 798 809.
5. Wax TDCA, Johnston WW. Clinical significance of an inconclusive cytopathologic diagnosis: a five-year experience at Duke University Medical Center. II. Analysis and follow-up of specimens from the respiratory tract. Acta Cytol 1997 41 (4 1053 1057.
6. Mathieu IMS, Willemart B, Destine M, Mazy G, Lonneux M. Inconclusive triple diagnosis in breast cancer imaging: is there a place for scintimammography? J Nucl Med 2005 46 (10 1574 1581.
7. Gill P, Whitaker J, Flaxman C, Brown N, Buckleton J. An investigation of the rigor of interpretation rules for STRs derived from less than 100 pg of DNA. Forensic Sci Int 2000 112 : 17 40.
8. Budowle B, Hobson DL, Smerick JB, Smith JAL. Low copy number - consideration and caution. Twelfth International Symposium on Human Identification; 2001 Oct 9-12 Madison, WI : Promega Corporation, 2001, http://www.promega.com/ussymp12proc/default.htm.
9. Caddy B, Taylor DR, Lincare AMT. A review of the science of low template DNA analysis. 2008, http://police.homeoffice.gov.uk/publications/operational- policing/Review-of-Low-Template-DNA-1.pdf?view=Binary.
10. The Queen v Sean Hoey, Neutral Citation Number [2007]. NICC 49. http://www.xproexperts.co.uk/newsletters/feb08/R%20v%20Hoey.pdf.
11. Gill P, Kirkham A, Curran J. LoComatioN: a software tool for the analysis of low copy number DNA profiles. Forensic Sci Int 2007 3 : 128 138.
12. Budowle B, Eisenberg AJ, van Daal A. Validity of low copy number typing and applications to forensic science. Croatian Med J 2009 50 (3 207 217.