Abdominal access in gynaecological laparoscopy: a comparison between direct optical and blind closed access by Verres needle

European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology

Volumn 148, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 191-194

  Tinelli, Andrea ^a   Malvasi, Antonio ^b   Istre, Olav ^c   Keckstein, Joerg ^d   Stark, Michael ^e   Mettler, Liselotte ^f  

^a VITO FAZZI HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^b Santa Maria Hospital   (Italy)

^c BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^d LKH Villach ^*  (Austria)

^e New European Surgical Academy NESA   (Germany)

^f UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL SCHLESWIG HOLSTEIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Blind closed access; Direct optical access; First abdominal access; Gynaecological laparoscopy; Laparoscopic complications; Laparoscopic entry; Laparoscopic procedure; Verres needle

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; BLIND CLOSED ACCESS; BLOOD VESSEL INJURY; DIRECT OPTICAL ACCESS; FEMALE; GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTESTINE INJURY; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NEEDLE; OVARY CYST; PNEUMOPERITONEUM; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SAFETY; SURGEON; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TROCAR; VERRES NEEDLE;

EID: 74149089480     PISSN: 03012115     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.10.025     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Jansen F.W., Kolkman W., Bakkum E.A., de Kroon C.D., Trimbos-Kemper T.C.M., and Trimbos J.B. Complications of laparoscopy: an inquiry about closed-versus open-entry technique. Am J Obstet Gynecol 190 (2004) 634-638
2. Magrina J. Complications of laparoscopic surgery. Clin Obstet Gynecol 45 (2002) 469-480
3. Tinelli A., Malvasi A., Schneider A.J., et al. First abdominal access in gynaecological laparoscopy: which method to utilize?. Minerva Ginecol 58 October (5) (2006) 429-440
4. Ahmad G., Duffy J.M., Phillips K., and Watson A. Laparoscopic entry techniques. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 16 2 (2008) CD006583
5. Chandler J.G., Corson S.L., and Way L.W. Three spectra of laparoscopic entry access injuries. J Am Coll Surg 192 (2001) 478-490
6. Molloy D., Kaloo P.D., Cooper M., and Nguyen T.V. Laparoscopic entry: a literature review and analysis of techniques and complications of primary port entry. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 42 (2002) 246-254
7. Teoh B., Sen R., and Abbott J. An evaluation of four tests used to ascertain Verres needle placement at closed laparoscopy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 12 (2005) 153-158
8. Yuzpe A.A. Pneumoperitoneum needle and trocar injuries in laparoscopy: a survey on possible contributing factors and prevention. J Reprod Med 35 (1990) 485-490
9. Vilos G.A. The ABC of a safer laparoscopic entry. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 13 (2006) 249-251
10. Jansen F.W., Kapiteyn K., Trimbos-Kemper T., Hermans J., and Trimbos J.P. Complications of laparoscopy, a prospective multicentre observational study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 104 (1997) 595-600
11. Richardson R.F., and Sutton C.J.G. Complications of first entry: a prospective laparoscopic audit. Gynaecol Endosc 8 (1999) 327-334
12. Testut L., and Jacob O. Trattato di Anatomia Topografica: le pareti dell'addome (1977), UTET, Torino, Italy
13. Rouviere H. In: Cordier G., and Delmas A. (Eds). Anatomie humaine descriptive e topographique. 9th ed. (1962), Masson, Paris