Cholecystocholedocholithiasis: A case-control study comparing the short- and long-term outcomes for a "laparoscopy-first" attitude with the outcome for sequential treatment (systematic endoscopic sphincterotomy followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy)

Surgical Endoscopy

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 51-62

  Costi, Renato ^a,b   Mazzeo, Antonio ^a,b   Tartamella, Francesco ^a,b   Manceau, Christine ^a   Vacher, Bernard ^a   Valverde, Alain ^a  

^a CENTRE HOSPITALIER VICTOR DUPOUY   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PARMA   (Italy)

Author keywords

CBD stones; Endoscopy; ERCP; Laparoscopy; Outcome; Therapy

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BILIARY TRACT DRAINAGE; CASE CONTROL STUDY; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; CHOLEDOCHOTOMY; CHOLELITHIASIS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMMON BILE DUCT STONE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; ENDOSCOPIC SPHINCTEROTOMY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURGICAL MORTALITY;

EID: 74149088721     PISSN: 09302794     EISSN: 14322218     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-009-0511-6     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Martin DJ, Vernon DR, Toouli J (2006) Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2):CD003327
2. Scientific Committee of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (E.A.E.S.) 1998 Diagnosis and treatment of common bile duct stones (CBDS): results of a consensus development conference Surg Endosc 12 856 864 10.1007/s004649900729
3. M Morino F Baracchi C Miglietta N Furlan R Ragona A Garbarini 2006 Preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy versus laparoendoscopic rendezvous in patients with gallbladder and bile duct stones Ann Surg 244 889 893 10.1097/01.sla.0000246913.74870.fc 17122614
4. ES Clayton S Connor N Alexakis E Leandros 2006 Meta-analysis of endoscopy and surgery versus surgery alone for common bile duct stones with the gallbladder in situ Br J Surg 93 1185 1191 10.1002/bjs.5568 1:STN:280: DC%2BD28rntlKmtw%3D%3D 16964628 (Pubitemid 44547014)
5. NT Barwood LJ Valinsky MS Hobbs DR Fletcher MW Knuiman SC Ridout 2002 Changing methods of imaging the common bile duct in the laparoscopic cholecystectomy era in Western Australia: implications for surgical practice Ann Surg 235 41 50 10.1097/00000658-200201000-00006 11753041 (Pubitemid 34062398)
6. A Ghazi CK McSherry 1984 Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and sphincterotomy Ann Surg 199 21 27 10.1097/00000658-198401000-00004 1:STN:280:DyaL2c7gtlensw%3D%3D 6691727
7. M Rhodes L Sussman L Cohen MP Lewis 1998 Randomised trial of laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct versus postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for common bile duct stones Lancet 351 159 161 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)09175-7 1:STN:280:DyaK1c7htFGhsA%3D%3D 9449869 (Pubitemid 28037004)
8. PM Heinerman O Boeckl W Pimpl 1989 Selective ERCP and preoperative stone removal in bile duct surgery Ann Surg 209 267 272 10.1097/00000658-198903000- 00003 1:STN:280:DyaL1M7msFGiug%3D%3D 2923513
9. TZ Ong JL Khor DS Selamat KG Yeoh KY Ho 2005 Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in the post-MRCP era: a tertiary center experience World J Gastroenterol 11 5209 5212 16127754
10. ML Freeman DB Nelson S Sherman GB Haber ME Herman PJ Dorsher JP Moore MB Fennerty ME Ryan MJ Shaw JD Lande AM Pheley 1996 Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy N Engl J Med 335 909 918 10.1056/NEJM199609263351301 1:STN:280:DyaK28zmsFaktw%3D%3D 8782497 (Pubitemid 26314443)
11. LR Rábago C Vicente F Soler M Delgado I Moral I Guerra JL Castro E Quintanilla J Romeo R Llorente J Vázquez Echarri JL Martínez- Veiga F Gea 2006 Two-stage treatment with preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) compared with single-stage treatment with intraoperative ERCP for patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis with possible choledocholithiasis Endoscopy 38 779 786 10.1055/s-2006-944617 17001567 (Pubitemid 44314631)
12. BJ Ammori K Birbas D Davides A Vezakis M Larvin MJ McMahon 2000 Routine vs "on demand" postoperative ERCP for small bile duct calculi detected at intraoperative cholangiography: clinical evaluation and cost analysis Surg Endosc 14 1123 1126 10.1007/s004640000146 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7htFCjtg%3D%3D 11148780 (Pubitemid 32060359)
13. RA Erickson B Carlson 1995 The role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with laparoscopic cholecystectomies Gastroenterology 109 252 263 10.1016/0016-5085(95)90292-9 1:STN:280: DyaK2MzhslGntQ%3D%3D 7797023
14. L Sarli R Costi S Gobbi D Iusco G Sgobba L Roncoroni 2003 Scoring system to predict asymptomatic choledocholithiasis before laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a matched case-control study Surg Endosc 17 1396 1403 10.1007/s00464-002-9200-4 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2c7ks1Ogtw%3D%3D 12802652 (Pubitemid 37169804)
15. T Montariol C Rey A Charlier P Marre H Khabtani JM Hay A Fingerhut F Lacaine 1995 Preoperative evaluation of the probability of common bile duct stones. French Association for Surgical Research J Am Coll Surg 180 293 296 1:STN:280:DyaK2M7nvFemsA%3D%3D 7874339
16. N Menezes LP Marson AC debeaux IM Muir CD Auld 2000 Prospective analysis of a scoring system to predict choledocholithiasis Br J Surg 87 1176 1181 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01511.x 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2Fjs1OksQ%3D%3D 10971424 (Pubitemid 30695462)
17. B Topal S Fieuws K Tomczyk R Aerts W Van Steenbergen C Verslype F Penninckx 2009 Clinical models are inaccurate in predicting bile duct stones in situ for patients with gallbladder Surg Endosc 23 38 44 10.1007/s00464-008-9868- 1 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1M%2FgtVaksQ%3D%3D 18389316
18. SV Berdah P Orsoni T Bege M Barthet JC Grimaud R Picaud 2001 Follow-up of selective endoscopic ultrasonography and/or endoscopic retrograde cholangiography prior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective study of 300 patients Endoscopy 33 216 220 10.1055/s-2001-12796 1:STN:280: DC%2BD3Mvit1ChtA%3D%3D 11293752 (Pubitemid 32586394)
19. B Topal M Van de Moortel S Fieuws D Vanbeckevoort W Van Steenbergen R Aerts F Penninckx 2003 The value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in predicting common bile duct stones in patients with gallstone disease Br J Surg 90 42 47 10.1002/bjs.4025 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3s%2FhtlWksw%3D%3D 12520573 (Pubitemid 37040969)
20. B Suc J Escat D Cherqui G Fourtanier JM Hay A Fingerhut B Millat 1998 Surgery vs endoscopy as primary treatment in symptomatic patients with suspected common bile duct stones: a multicenter randomized trial. French Associations for Surgical Research Arch Surg 133 702 708 10.1001/archsurg.133.7.702 1:STN:280:DyaK1czltFarsA%3D%3D 9687996 (Pubitemid 28324148)
21. A Cuschieri E Lezoche M Morino E Croce A Lacy J Toouli A Faggioni VM Ribeiro J Jakimowicz J Visa GB Hanna 1999 E.A.E.S. multicenter prospective randomized trial comparing two-stage vs single-stage management of patients with gallstone disease and ductal calculi Surg Endosc 13 952 957 10.1007/s004649901145 1:STN:280:DyaK1MvlslGisw%3D%3D 10526025 (Pubitemid 29471352)
22. I Russell 1995 Evaluating new surgical procedures BMJ 311 1243 1244 1:STN:280:DyaK28%2FmvFSksw%3D%3D 7496220
23. LK Nathanson NA O'Rourke IJ Martin GA Fielding AE Cowen RK Roberts BJ Kendall P Kerlin BM Devereux 2005 Postoperative ERCP versus laparoscopic choledochotomy for clearance of selected bile duct calculi: a randomized trial Ann Surg 242 188 192 10.1097/01.sla.0000171035.57236.d7 16041208 (Pubitemid 41033434)
24. A Waage C Strömberg CE Leijonmarck D Arvidsson 2003 Long-term results from laparoscopic common bile duct exploration Surg Endosc 17 1181 1185 10.1007/s00464-002-8937-0 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2c7ks1KrsQ%3D%3D 12739114 (Pubitemid 37064787)
25. SE Tranter MH Thompson 2002 Comparison of endoscopic sphincterotomy and laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct Br J Surg 89 1495 1504 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02291.x 1:STN:280:DC%2BD38noslWquw%3D%3D 12445057 (Pubitemid 35404316)
26. J Bingener WH Schwesinger 2006 Management of common bile duct stones in a rural area of the United States: results of a survey Surg Endosc 20 577 579 10.1007/s00464-005-0322-3 1:STN:280:DC%2BD287pvVagtA%3D%3D 16437268
27. BK Poulose PG Arbogast MD Holzman 2006 National analysis of in-hospital resource utilization in choledocholithiasis management using propensity scores Surg Endosc 20 186 190 10.1007/s00464-005-0235-1 1:STN:280: DC%2BD28%2FjsVWqug%3D%3D 16362476 (Pubitemid 43130245)
28. C Collins D Maguire A Ireland E Fitzgerald GC O'Sullivan 2004 A prospective study of common bile duct calculi in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: natural history of choledocholithiasis revisited Ann Surg 239 28 33 10.1097/01.sla.0000103069.00170.9c 14685097 (Pubitemid 38176369)
29. SE Tranter MH Thompson 2003 Spontaneous passage of bile duct stones: frequency of occurrence and relation to clinical presentation Ann R Coll Surg Engl 85 174 177 10.1308/003588403321661325 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3szgtlKgsA%3D%3D 12831489 (Pubitemid 36591993)
30. IJ Martin IS Bailey M Rhodes N O'Rourke L Nathanson G Fielding 1998 Towards T-tube free laparoscopic bile duct exploration: a methodologic evolution during 300 consecutive procedures Ann Surg 228 29 34 10.1097/00000658- 199807000-00005 1:STN:280:DyaK1czjsVWgug%3D%3D 9671063 (Pubitemid 30190312)
31. Gurusamy KS, Samraj K (2007) Primary closure versus T-tube drainage after open common bile duct exploration. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (1):CD005640