Changing methods of imaging the common bile duct in the laparoscopic cholecystectomy era in Western Australia: Implications for surgical practice

Annals of Surgery

Volumn 235, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 41-50

  Barwood, Nigel T ^a   Valinsky, Liora J ^a   Hobbs, Michael S T ^a   Fletcher, David R ^a   Knuiman, Matthew W ^a   Ridout, Steve C ^a  

^a FREMANTLE HOSPITAL   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; COMMON BILE DUCT; COMMON BILE DUCT STONE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PEROPERATIVE CHOLANGIOGRAPHY; POPULATION RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT INDICATION;

ACUTE DISEASE; AGED; AUSTRALIA; CHOLANGIOGRAPHY; CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY, ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE; CHOLECYSTECTOMY, LAPAROSCOPIC; CHOLECYSTITIS; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; GALLSTONES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; ODDS RATIO; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

EID: 0036142454     PISSN: 00034932     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00000658-200201000-00006     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Complications of cholecystectomy: Risks of the laparoscopic approach and protective effects of operative cholangiography: A population-based study
2. La colangiografia durante las operaciones de las vias biliares
3. Safety, efficacy, cost and morbidity of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy: A prospective analysis of 228 consecutive patients
4. Routine versus selective intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy
5. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Role of pre- and postop ERCP and endoscopic sphincterotomy
6. Routine laparoscopic cholangiography: A means of avoiding unnecessary endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
7. Routine cholangiography is not warranted during laparoscopic cholecystectomy
8. Selective cholangiography in laparoscopic cholecystectomy
9. Prediction of common bile duct stones by noninvasive tests
10. Changes in the practice of biliary surgery and ERCP during the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy to Australia: Their possible significance
11. ERCP interaction with laparoscopic cholecystectomy
12. Timing of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of choledocholithiasis
13. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: What national benefits have been achieved at what cost?
14. The role of cholangiography in laparoscopic cholecystectomy
15. Biliary injury at laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Recognition and prevention
16. Biliary tract complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy are detected more frequently with routine intraoperative cholangiography
17. Bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy
18. An unusual complication of intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy
19. Two pitfalls of laparoscopic balloon cholangiography: Recognition and correction
20. Technique and results of laparoscopic choledochotomy for the management of bile duct calculi
21. Update on transcystic exploration of the bile duct
22. Laparoscopic choledochoscopy: An effective approach to the common duct
23. Management of acute cholangitis and the impact of endoscopic sphincterotomy
24. Measurement of surgical costs: A clinical analysis
25. A prospective cost analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy
26. CBD stones-outcomes and costs. Laparoscopic transcystic techniques other than choledochoscopy
27. Costs of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Analysis of potential savings
28. The economic considerations in laparoscopic surgery
29. Increased rate of cholecystectomy after introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Saudi Arabia
30. Falling cholecystectomy thresholds since the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy
31. Increased cholecystectomy rate after the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy
32. A cost utility analysis of treatment options for gallstone disease: Methodological issues and results