Statistical significance testing for the association of magnetometer records at high-, mid- and low latitudes during substorm days

Planetary and Space Science

Volumn 58, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 437-445

  Maslova, I ^a   Kokoszka, P ^a   Sojka, J ^a   Zhu, L ^a  

^a UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Functional linear model; Magnetosphere ionosphere (currents systems, substorms); Statistical test of no association

Indexed keywords

FUNCTIONAL DATA ANALYSIS; FUNCTIONAL LINEAR MODEL; GEOPHYSICAL DATA; HIGH LATITUDES; LINEAR MODEL; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; STATISTICAL TECHNIQUES; STRAIGHT LINES; SUBSTORMS;

IONOSPHERE; IONOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT; MAGNETOMETERS; MAGNETOSPHERE; STATISTICAL TESTS;

CURVE FITTING;

EID: 74149087609     PISSN: 00320633     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pss.2009.11.004     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Campbell W.H. Geomagnetic storms: the Dst-ring current myth and lognormal distributions. Journal of Atmospheric and Terrestrial Physics 58 (1996) 1171-1187
2. Cattell R.B. The scree test for the number of factors. Journal of Multivariate Behavioral Research 1 (1966) 245-276
3. Chen, G.-X., Xu, W.-Y., Du, A.-M., Wu, Y.-Y., Chen, B., Liu, X.-C., 2007. Statistical characteristics of the day-to day variability in the geomagnetic sq field. Journal of Geophysical Research 112, doi:10.1029/2006JA012059.
4. Chiou J.-M., and Müller H.-G. Diagnostics for functional regression via residual processes. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 15 (2007) 4849-4863
5. Daglis, I.A., et al., 2003. Intense space storms: critical issues and open disputes. Journal of Geophysical Research 108, doi:10.1029/2002JA009722.
6. Friedrich E., Rostoker G., Connors M.G., and McPherron R.L. Influence of the substorm current wedge on the Dst index. Journal of Geophysical Research 104 (1999) 4567
7. Kamide Y., et al. Current understanding of magnetic storms: storm-substorm relationships. Journal of Geophysical Research 103 (1998) 17705-17728
8. Kikuchi T., Hashimoto K.K., and Nozaki K. Penetration of magnetospheric electric fields to the equator during a geomagnetic storm. Journal of Geophysical Research 113 (2008) A06214 10.1029/2007JA012628
9. Kitamura K., Kawano H., Ohtani S., Yoshikawa A., and Yumoto K. Local time distribution of low and middle latitude ground magnetic disturbances at sawtooth injections of 18-19 April 2002. Journal of Geophysical Research 110 (2005) A07208 10.1029/2004JA010734
10. Kivelson, M.G., Russell, C.T. (Eds.), 1997. Introduction to Space Physics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
11. Kokoszka P., Maslova I., Sojka J., and Zhu L. Testing for lack of dependence in the functional linear model. Canadian Journal of Statistics 36 (2008) 207-222
12. Ramsay J.O., and Silverman B.W. Applied Functional Data Analysis (2002), Springer, Berlin
13. Ramsay J.O., and Silverman B.W. Functional Data Analysis (2005), Springer, Berlin
14. Ramsay, J.O., Wickham, H., Graves, S., 2007. fda: Functional Data Analysis. R package version 1.2.3. URL 〈http://www.functionaldata.org〉.
15. Rostoker G. Effects of substorms on the stormtime ring current index Dst. Annales Geophysicae 18 (2000) 1390-1398
16. Tsyganenko N.A. Modeling the inner magnetosphere: the asymmetric ring current and region 2 Birkland current revisited. Journal of Geophysical Research 105 (2000) 27739
17. Xu, W.-Y., Kamide, Y., 2004. Decomposition of daily geomagnetic variations by using method of natural orthogonal component. Journal of Geophysical Research 109, A05218, doi:10.1029/203JA010216.