A comparison of linear and exponential regression for estimating diffusive CH4 fluxes by closed-chambers in peatlands

Soil Biology and Biochemistry

Volumn 42, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 507-515

  Forbrich, Inke ^a   Kutzbach, Lars ^a,b   Hormann, Annabell ^c   Wilmking, Martin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GREIFSWALD   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HAMBURG   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF POTSDAM   (Germany)

Author keywords

Closed chamber measurements; Flux calculation; Gas diffusion; Methane; Non linearity; Peatlands; Regression

Indexed keywords

CLOSED CHAMBERS; CLOSED-CHAMBER MEASUREMENTS; FLUX CALCULATIONS; GAS DIFFUSION; NON-LINEARITY; PEAT LAND;

AQUIFERS; CONCENTRATION (PROCESS); DIFFUSION IN GASES; LINEARIZATION; METHANE; PEAT; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL TESTS; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; WETLANDS;

EXPONENTIAL FUNCTIONS;

FLUX MEASUREMENT; GAS EXCHANGE; METHANE; NONLINEARITY; PEATLAND; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; WATER TABLE;

EID: 74049165098     PISSN: 00380717     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.12.004     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Alm J., Shurpali N., Tuittila E.-S., Laurila T., Maljanen M., Saarnio S., and Minkkinen K. Methods for determining emission factors for the use of peat and peatlands - flux measurements and modelling. Boreal Environment Research 12 2 (2007) 85-100
2. Bain W., Hutyra L., Patterson D., Bright A., Daube B., Munger J., and Wofsy S. Wind-induced error in the measurement of soil respiration using closed dynamic chambers. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 131 3-4 (2005) 225-232
3. Becker T., Kutzbach L., Forbrich I., Schneider J., Jager D., Thees B., and Wilmking M. Do we miss the hot spots? - The use of very high-resolution aerial photographs to quantify carbon fluxes in peatlands. Biogeosciences 5 5 (2008) 1387-1393
4. Bubier J.L., Moore T., Savage K., and Crill P. A comparison of methane flux in a boreal landscape between a dry and a wet year. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 19 1 (2005)
5. Burnham K.P., and Anderson D.R. Multimodel inference: Understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociological Methods Research 33 2 (2004) 261-304
6. Chanton J., and Whiting G. Trace gas exchange in freshwater and coastal marine environments: Ebullition and transport by plants. (Chapter 4). In: Matson P., and Harriss R. (Eds). Biogenic Trace Gases: Measuring Emissions from Soil and Water (1995), Blackwell Science 98-126
7. Clymo R., Pearce D., and Conrad R. Methane and carbon dioxide production in, transport through, and efflux from a peatland [and discussion]. Philosophical Transactions: Physical Sciences and Engineering 351 1696 (1995) 249-259
8. Conen F., and Smith K.A. A re-examination of closed flux chamber methods for the measurement of trace gas emissions from soils to the atmosphere. European Journal of Soil Science 49 4 (1998) 701-707
9. Conen F., and Smith K.A. An explanation of linear increases in gas concentration under closed chambers used to measure gas exchange between soil and the atmosphere. European Journal of Soil Science 51 1 (2000) 111-117
10. Davidson E.A., Savage K., Verchot L.V., and Navarro R. Minimizing artifacts and biases in chamber-based measurements of soil respiration. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 113 1-4 (2002) 21-37
11. Denmead O. Nitrous oxide and methane flux in Australian and New Zealand landscapes: Measurements modeling and mitigation. Plant and Soil 309 1 (2008) 1-4
12. Fechner-Levy E.J., and Hemond H.F. Trapped methane volume and potential effects on methane ebullition in a northern peatland. Limnology and Oceanography 41 7 (1996) 1375-1383
13. Healy R.W., Striegl R.G., Russell T.F., Hutchinson G.L., and Livingston G.P. Numerical evaluation of static-chamber measurements of soil atmosphere gas exchange: Identification of physical processes. Soil Science Society of America Journal 60 3 (1996) 740-747
14. Hutchinson G., and Livingston G. Vents and seals in non-steady-state chambers used for measuring gas exchange between soil and the atmosphere. European Journal of Soil Science 52 4 (2001) 675-682
15. Jager D., Wilmking M., and Kukkonen J. The influence of summer seasonal extremes on dissolved organic carbon export from a boreal peatland catchment: Evidence from one dry and one wet growing season. Science of the Total Environment 407 4 (2009) 1373-1382
16. 4 fluxes of three different hydromorphic soil types of a temperate forest ecosystem. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 40 (2008) 2047-2054
17. Knorr K.-H., Oosterwoud M.R., and Blodau C. Experimental drought alters rates of soil respiration and methanogenesis but not carbon exchange in soil of a temperate fen. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 40 7 (2008) 1781-1791
18. 2O flux measurements by static chambers. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 82 (2008) 175-186
19. 2O eddy covariance flux measurements. Biogeosciences 4 5 (2007) 715-728
20. 2 flux determination by closed-chamber methods can be seriously biased by inappropriate application of linear regression. Biogeosciences 4 6 (2007) 1005-1025
21. Livingston G., and Hutchinson G. Enclosure-based measurements of trace gas exchange: Applications and sources of error. (Chapter 2). In: Matson P., and Harriss R. (Eds). Biogenic Trace Gases: Measuring Emissions from Soil and Water (1995), Blackwell Science 14-52
22. Livingston G.P., Hutchinson G.L., and Spartalian K. Trace gas emission in chambers: A non-steady-state diffusion model. Soil Science Society of America Journal 70 5 (2006) 1459-1469
23. Matthias A.D., Yarger D.N., and Weinbeck R.S. A numerical evaluation of chamber methods for determining gas fluxes. Geophysical Research Letters 5 (1978) 765-768
24. Nakano T., Sawamoto T., Morishita T., Inoue G., and Hatano R. A comparison of regression methods for estimating soil-atmosphere diffusion gas fluxes by a closed-chamber technique. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 36 (2004) 107-113
25. 2 efflux: Analysis of error sources related to the chamber system. Journal of Geophysical Research 103 D8 (2001) 7985-7992
26. 2 efflux. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 123 (2004) 159-176
27. Riutta T., Laine J., Aurela M., Rinne J., Vesala T., Laurila T., Haapanala S., Pihlatie M., and Tuittila E.-S. Spatial variation in plant community functions regulates carbon gas dynamics in a boreal fen ecosystem. Tellus 59B (2007) 838-852
28. Rochette P., and Eriksen-Hamel N. Chamber measurements of nitrous oxide flux: Are absolute values reliable?. Soil Science Society of America Journal 72 2 (2008) 331-342
29. Rosenberry D.O., Glaser P.H., Siegel D.I., and Weeks E.P. Use of hydraulic head to estimate volumetric gas content and ebullition flux in northern peatlands. Water Resources Research 39 3 (2003)
30. 4 emissions and production and oxidation potentials at microsites on an oligotrophic pine fen. Oecologia 110 (1997) 414-422
31. 4 emission from polygonal tundra on the micro-site scale in the Lena River Delta, Siberia. submitted for publication
32. 4 emission from polygonal tundra in the Lena River Delta, Siberia. Journal of Geophysical Research 113 (2008) G00A03
33. Smith K., and Conen F. Measurements of trace gases, I: Gas analysis, chamber methods, and related procedures. (Chapter 10). In: Smith K., and Cresser M. (Eds). Soil and Environmental Analysis: Modern Instrumental Techniques (2004), Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, Basel 433-477
34. Strack M., Kellner E., and Waddington J. Dynamics of biogenic gas bubbles in peat and their effects on peatland biogeochemistry. Global Biogeochemcial Cycles 19 (2005)
35. Strack M., Waller M.F., and Waddington J. Sedge succession and peatland methane dynamics: A potential feedback to climate change. Ecosystems 9 (2006) 278-287
36. Wagner S.W., Reicosky D.C., and Alessi R.S. Regression models for calculating gas fluxes measured with a closed chamber. Agronomy Journal 89 2 (1997) 279-284
37. Wille C., Kutzbach L., Sachs T., Wagner D., and Pfeiffer E.-M. Methane emission from Siberian arctic polygonal tundra: Eddy covariance measurements and modeling. Global Change Biology 14 6 (2008) 1395-1408