Towards scientific workflow patterns

Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Workflows in Support of Large-Scale Science, WORKS '09, in Conjunction with SC 2009

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages

  Yildiz, Ustun ^a   Guabtni, Adnene ^b   Ngu, Anne H H ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^c TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Patterns; Scientific workflow management systems; Workflow modeling

Indexed keywords

DATA DEPENDENCIES; DESIGN PATTERNS; MODELING NOTATION; PROCESS MODELING; SCIENTIFIC WORKFLOWS; WORKFLOW MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS; WORKFLOW MODELING; WORKFLOW MODELS;

SEMANTICS; WORK SIMPLIFICATION;

MANAGEMENT;

EID: 74049151905     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1645164.1645177     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Workflow patterns. http://www.workflowpatterns.com/.
2. Kepler - scientific workflow management system, 2008. https://kepler-project.org/.
3. Ilkay Altintas, Oscar Barney, and Efrat Jaeger-Frank. Provenance collection support in the kepler scientific workflow system. In Provenance and Annotation of Data, International Provenance and Annotation Workshop, IPAW, volume 4145 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 118-132. Springer, 2006.
4. Alistair P. Barros, Marlon Dumas, and Arthur H. M. ter Hofstede. Service interaction patterns. In Business Process Management, pages 302-318, 2005.
5. Shishir Bharathi, Ann Chervenak, Ewa Deelman, Gaurang Mehta, Mei-Hui Su, and Karan Vahi. Characterization of scientific workflows. In Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Workflows in Support of Large-Scale Science, WORKS, pages 1-10. IEEE Computing Society, 2008.
6. Shawn Bowers, Bertram Ludäscher, Anne H. H. Ngu, and Terence Critchlow. Enabling scientific workflow reuse through structured composition of dataflow and control flow. In SciFlow, 2006.
7. Eran Chinthaka, Jaliya Ekanayake, David Leake, and Beth Plale. Cbr based workflow composition assistant. In IEEE Congress on Services, Part I, Scientific Workflows Workshop, pages 352-355, USA, 2009. IEEE Computer Society.
8. Fonda Daniels, Kalhee Kim, and Mladen A. Vouk. The reliable hybrid pattern : A generalized software fault tolerant design pattern. In The 4th Pattern Languages of Programming Conference, PLoP, pages 1-13, 1997.
9. Susan B. Davidson and Juliana Freire. Provenance and scientific workflows: challenges and opportunities. In SIGMOD Conference, pages 1345-1350, 2008.
10. Ewa Deelman, Gurmeet Singh, Mei-Hui Su, James Blythe, Yolanda Gil, Carl Kesselman, Gaurang Mehta, Karan Vahi, G. Bruce Berriman, John Good, Anastasia C. Laity, Joseph C. Jacob, and Daniel S. Katz. Pegasus: A framework for mapping complex scientic workflows onto distributed systems. Scientific Programming, 13(3):219-237, 2005.
11. Erich Gamma, Richard Helm, Ralph Johnson, and John Vlissides. Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software. Published by Addison-Wesley, 1995.
12. Dimitrios Georgakopoulos, Mark F. Hornick, and Amit P. Sheth. An overview of workflow management: From process modeling to workflow automation infrastructure. Distributed and Parallel Databases, 3(2):119-153, 1995.
13. Michael J.C. Gordon. Programming language theory and its implementation. Prentice Hall International (UK) Ltd., Hertfordshire, UK, UK, 1988.
14. Paul Groth and Yolanda Gil. Analyzing the gap between workflows and their natural language descriptions. In IEEE Congress on Services, Part I, Scientific Workflows Workshop, pages 299-305, USA, 2009. IEEE Computer Society.
15. Object Management Group/Business Process Management Initiative. Business Process Modeling Notation, BPMN 1.1: OMG Specification, February 2008.
16. Bertram Ludäscher and Ilkay Altintas. On simplifying collection handling and control-flow issues in SPA/Ptolemy-II. Technical Report SciDAC-SPA-TN-2003-01, San Diego Supercomputer Center, 2003.
17. David Martin and Ian Sommerville. Patterns of cooperative interaction: Linking ethnomethodology and design. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact., 11(1):59-89, 2004.
18. Johan Montagnat, Tristan Glatard, and Diane Lingrand. Data composition patterns in service-based workflows. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Workflows in Support of Large-Scale Science, WORKS, France, 2006.
19. Anne H. H. Ngu, Shawn Bowers, Nicholas Haasch, Timothy M. McPhillips, and Terence Critchlow. Flexible scientific workflow modeling using frames, templates, and dynamic embedding. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Scientic and Statistical Database Management, SSDBM, pages 566-572, 2008.
20. OASIS. Web Services Business Process Execution Language, version 2.0 (retrieved october 18, 2006), 2005. http://docs.oasis-open.org/wsbpel/2.0/ wsbpel-specification-draft.html.
21. Leon J. Osterweil. Software processes are software too, revisited: An invited talk on the most inuential paper of icse 9. In ICSE, pages 540-548, Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Software Engineering, 1997.
22. Norbert Podhorszki, Bertram Ludäscher, and Scott A. Klasky. Workflow automation for processing plasma fusion simulation data. In 2nd Workshop on Workflows in Support of Large-Scale Science (WORKS), pages 35-44, 2007.
23. Anne Rozinat, Ana Karla Alves de Medeiros, Christian W. Günther, A. J. M. M. Weijters, and Wil M. P. van der Aalst. The need for a process mining evaluation framework in research and practice. In Business Process Management Workshops, volume 4928 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 84-89. Springer, 2007.
24. Nick Russell, Arthur H. M. ter Hofstede, David Edmond, and Wil M. P. van der Aalst. Workflow data patterns: Identification, representation and tool support. In ER, pages 353-368, 2005.
25. Nick Russell, Wil M. P. van der Aalst, and Arthur H. M. ter Hofstede. Workflow exception patterns. In CAiSE, pages 288-302, 2006.
26. Wil M. P. van der Aalst, Arthur H. M. ter Hofstede, Bartek Kiepuszewski, and Alistair P. Barros. Workflow patterns. Distributed and Parallel Databases, 14(1):5-51, 2003.
27. Ingo Wassink, Paul E. van der Vet, Katy Wolstencroft, Pieter B.T. Neerincx, Marco Roos andHan Rauwerda, and Timo M. Breit. Analysing scientific workflows: Why workflows not only connect web services. In IEEE Congress on Services, Part I, Scientific Workflows Workshop, pages 314-321, USA, 2009. IEEE Computer Society.