Workflow automation for processing plasma fusion simulation data

Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Workflows in Support of Large-scale Science, WORKS'07

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 35-44

  Podhorszki, Norbert ^a   Ludaescher, Bertram ^a   Klasky, Scott A ^b  

^a University of California   (United States)

^b OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Checkpointing; Kepler; Plasma fusion; Scientific workflow; SSH

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE SYSTEMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATA FLOW ANALYSIS; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERING;

CHECKPOINTING; PLASMA FUSION; SCIENTIFIC WORKFLOW;

DATA PROCESSING;

EID: 34548059255     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1273360.1273368     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. I. Altintas, E. Jaeger, K. Lin, B. Ludäscher, and A. Memon. A web service composition and deployment framework for scientific workflows. In 2nd Intl. Conference on Web Services (ICWS), San Diego, California, July 2004.
2. V. Bhat, S. Atchley, S. Klasky, M. Parashar, and M. Beck. High performance threaded data streaming for large scale simulations. In Proceedings of the 5th International Grid Computing Workshop (Grid 2004), pages 243-250, Pittsburgh, PA, Nov. 2004. IEEE Computer Society Press.
3. S. Bowers and B. Ludäscher. Actor-oriented design of scientific workflows. 24st Intl. Conf. on Conceptual Modeling (ER), Klagenfurt, Austria, LNCS, Springer 2005.
4. J.M. Dawson (1983). Particle simulation of plasmas. Reviews of Modem Physics 55: 403.
5. E. Deelman, G. Singh, M-H. Su, J. Blythe, Y. Gil, C. Kesselman, G. Mehta, K. Vahi, G.B. Berriman, J. Good, A. Laity, J.C. Jacob and D.S. Katz. Pegasus: a Framework for Mapping Complex Scientific Workflows onto Distributed Systems. Scientific Programming Journal, Vol 13(3), 2005, pp. 219-237
6. J. Eker, J. W. Janneck, E. A. Lee, J. Liu, X. Liu, J. Ludvig, S. Neuendorffer, S. Sachs, and Y. Xiong. Taming Heterogeneity - The Ptolemy Approach. In Proceedings of the IEEE, volume 91(1), January 2003.
7. T. Fahringer, A. Jugravu, S. Pllana, R. Prodan, C. Seragiotto and H-L. Truong. ASKALON: a tool set for cluster and Grid computing: Research Articles. Journal of Concurrency and Computation : Pract. Exper., Vol. 17, No. 2-4, 2005, pp. 143-169.
8. J. Frey, T. Tannenbaum, I. Foster, M. Livny and S. Tuecke. Condor-G: A Computation Management Agent for Multi-Institutional Grids. Journal of Cluster Computing, Vol. 5, pp. 237-246, 2002.
9. D. Gannon, S. Krishnan, L. Fang, G. Kandaswamy, Y. Simmhan, and A. Slominski. On Building Parallel and Grid Applications: Component Technology and Distributed Services. Proceedings of CLADE 2004, Challenges of Large Applications in Distributed Environments. June 2004.
10. A. Hoheisel. User tools and languages for graph-based Grid workflows. Journal of Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, Special Issue: Workflow in Grid Systems. Eds. G.C. Fox, D. Gannon, Vol. 18, Issue 10, pp 1101-1113, 2005
11. P. Kacsuk, Z. Farkas, G. Sipos, A. Toth and G. Hermann. Workflow-level Parameter Study Management in multi-Grid environments by the P-GRADE Grid portal. Grid Computing Environment Workshop, Supercomputing'06, Tampa, FL. To appear in 2007
12. G. Kahn. The Semantics of a Simple Language for Parallel Programming. In J. L. Rosenfeld, editor, Proc. of the IFIP Congress 74, pages 471-175. North-Holland, 1974.
13. S. Ku, C. Chang, M. Adams, and et al. Gyrokinetic particle simulation of neoclassical transport in the pedestal/scrape-off region of a, tokamak plasma. In Institute of physics Publishing Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 46, pages 87-91, 2006.
14. G. von Laszewski, I. Foster, J. Gawor and P. Lane. A Java Commodity Grid Toolkit. Concurrency and Computation: Practice & Experience, vol. 13, 2001.
15. E.A. Lee and T.M. Parks. Dataflow process networks. Proc. of the IEEE, 83(5), 1995.
16. E.A. Lee and S. Neuendorffer. Actor-oriented models for codesign: Balancing re-use and performance. In Formal methods and models for system design: a system level perspective, ISBN:1-4020-8051-4, pp. 33-56, 2004.
17. Z. Lin, S. Ethier, T. S. Hahm, and W. M. Tang. Size scaling of turbulent transport in magnetically confined plasmas. Phys. Rev. Lett., 88(19):195004, Apr. 2002.
18. B. Ludäscher, I. Altintas, C. Berkley, D. Higgins, E. Jaeger, M. Jones, E. A. Lee, J. Tao and Y. Zhao. Scientific Workflow Management and the Kepler System. Concurrency and Computation: Practice & Experience, 18(10):1039-1065, August 2006.
19. T. McPhillips and S. Bowers. An approach for pipelining nested collections in scientific workflows. SIGMOD Record, 34(3):12-17, 2005.
20. T. Oinn, M. Greenwood, M. Addis, M.N. Alpdemir, J. Ferris, K. Glover C. Goble, A. Goderis, D. Hull, D. Marvin, P. Li, P. Lord, M.R. Pocock, M. Senger, R. Stevens, A. Wipat and C. Wroe. Taverna: Lessons in Creating a Workflow Environment for the Life Sciences. Journal of Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, Vol.18 Issue 10. pp. 1067-1100, 2005
21. C. Pautasso and G. Alonso. The JOpera visual composition language. Journal of Visual Languages & Computing, Vol. 16, Issues 1-2 , Feb-Apr 2005, pp. 119-152.
22. I. Taylor, M. Shields, I. Wang, and A. Harrison. The Triana Workflow Environment: Architecture and Applications. In I. Taylor, E. Deelman, D. Gannon, and M. Shields, editors, Workflows for e-Science, pages 320-339. Springer, New York, Secaucus, NJ, USA, 2007.
23. Y. Zhao, M. Wilde and I. Foster. Virtual Data Language: A Typed Workflow Notation for Diversely Structured Scientific Data. Taylor, I.J., Deelman, E., Gannon, D.B. and Shields, M. eds. Workflows for eScience, Springer, 2007, 258-278.
24. BBCP peer-to-peer parallel file transfer software, http://www.slac. Stanford.edu/~ abh/bbcp/
25. Ganymed SSH-2 for Java. http://www.ganymed.ethz.ch/ssh2
26. IP*Works! .NET Workflow Edition for Windows Workflow Foundation, http://www.nsof tware.com/workflow
27. JSch - Java Secure Channel, http://www.jcraft.com/jsch
28. SDM - Scientific Data Management Center http ://sdm.lbl.gov/sdmcenter