Change propagation in process models using behavioural profiles

SCC 2009 - 2009 IEEE International Conference on Services Computing

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 33-40

  Weidlich, Matthias ^a   Weske, Mathias ^a   Mendling, Jan ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF POTSDAM   (Germany)

^b HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Behaviour equivalence; Change propagation; Model alignment; Process adaptation

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIOUR EQUIVALENCE; BUSINESS NEEDS; BUSINESS PROCESS CHANGE; BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT; BUSINESS PROCESS MODELLING; CHANGE PROPAGATION; CHANGE REGION; IN-PROCESS; MULTIPLE MODELS; PROCESS ENACTMENT; PROCESS MODEL; SYNCHRONISATION;

ENTERPRISE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT;

ALIGNMENT;

EID: 74049134691     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/SCC.2009.58     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. V. Grover, K. Fiedler, and J. Teng, "Exploring the Success of Information Technology Enabled Businessprocess Reengineering," IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 276-284, August 1994.
2. C. Rolland and N. Prakash, "Bridging the Gap Between Organisational Needs and ERP Functionality," Requirements Engineering, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 180-193, October 2000.
3. M. Weidlich, A. Barros, J. Mendling, and M. Weske, "Vertical Alignment of Process Models - How can we get there?" in CAiSE 2009 Workshop Proceedings - 10th Workshop on Business Process Modeling, Development, and Support (BPMDS), ser. LNBIP, S. Nurcan, R. Schmidt, P. Soffer, and R. Ukor, Eds., no. 29. Springer, 2009, pp. 71-84.
4. J. B. Hill, M. Cantara, M. Kerremans, and D. C. Plummer, "Magic Quadrant for Business Process Management Suites," Gartner Research, vol. G00164485, February 2009.
5. Logica Management Consulting, "Securing the Value of Business Process Change," Whitepaper, October 2008.
6. OMG, Business Process Modeling Notation (BPMN) 1.2, January 2009.
7. E. Rahm and P. A. Bernstein, "A Survey of Approaches to Automatic Schema Matching," VLDB Journal, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 334-350, 2001.
8. W. M. P. van der Aalst, "The Application of Petri Nets to Workflow Management," Journal of Circuits, Systems, and Computers, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 21-66, 1998.
9. R. Dijkman, M. Dumas, and C. Ouyang, "Semantics and Analysis of Business Process Models in BPMN," Information and Software Technology (IST), vol. 50, no. 12, pp. 1281-1294, 2009.
10. R. Eshuis and R. Wieringa, "Tool Support for Verifying UML Activity Diagrams," IEEE Trans. Software Eng., vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 437-447, 2004.
11. J. Mendling, Metrics for Process Models: Empirical Foundations of Verification, Error Prediction, and Guidelines for Correctness, ser. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing. Springer, 2008, vol. 6.
12. B. Weber, S. Rinderle, and M. Reichert, "Change Patterns and Change Support Features in Process-Aware Information Systems," in CAiSE, ser. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, J. Krogstie, A. L. Opdahl, and G. Sindre, Eds., vol. 4495. Springer, 2007, pp. 574-588.
13. J. Esparza, "Reachability in Live and Safe Free-Choice Petri Nets is NP-Complete," Theor. Comput. Sci., vol. 198, no. 1-2, pp. 211-224, 1998.
14. A. Kovalyov and J. Esparza, "A Polynomial Algorithm to Compute the Concurrency Relation of Free-Choice Signal Transition Graphs," in Prof. of the International Workshop on Discrete Event Systems, WODES'96. Edinburgh, 1996, pp. 1-6.
15. S. Rinderle, M. Reichert, and P. Dadam, "Correctness Criteria for Dynamic Changes in Workflow Systems - A Survey," Data Knowl. Eng., vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 9-34, 2004.
16. W. Aalst, A. Weijters, and L. Maruster, "Workflow Mining: Discovering Process Models from Event Logs," IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 1128-1142, 2004.
17. R. J. van Glabbeek and U. Goltz, "Refinement of Actions and Equivalence Notions for Concurrent Systems," Acta Inf., vol. 37, no. 4/5, pp. 229-327, 2001.
18. A. K. A. de Medeiros, W. M. P. van der Aalst, and A. J. M. M. Weijters, "Quantifying Process Equivalence based on Observed Behavior," Data Knowl. Eng., vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 55-74, 2008.
19. B. F. van Dongen, R. M. Dijkman, and J. Mendling, "Measuring Similarity between Business Process Models," in CAiSE, ser. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Z. Bellahsene and M. Léonard, Eds., vol. 5074. Springer, 2008, pp. 450-464.
20. B. F. van Dongen, J. Mendling, and W. M. P. van der Aalst, "Structural Patterns for Soundness of Business Process Models," in Tenth IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC 2006), 16-20 October 2006, Hong Kong, China. IEEE Computer Society, 2006, pp. 116-128.
21. G. Rull, C. Farré, E. Teniente, and T. Urpí, "Validation of Mappings between Schemas," Data Knowl. Eng., vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 414-437, 2008.
22. R. M. Dijkman, "Diagnosing Differences between Business Process Models," in BPM, ser. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, M. Dumas, M. Reichert, and M.-C. Shan, Eds., vol. 5240. Springer, 2008, pp. 261-277.
23. J. M. Küster, C. Gerth, A. Förster, and G. Engels, "Detecting and Resolving Process Model Differences in the Absence of a Change Log," in BPM, ser. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, M. Dumas, M. Reichert, and M.-C. Shan, Eds., vol. 5240. Springer, 2008, pp. 244-260.
24. M. Dumas, M. Reichert, and M.-C. Shan, Eds., Business Process Management, 6th International Conference, BPM 2008, Milan, Italy, September 2-4, 2008. Proceedings, ser. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 5240. Springer, 2008.