Coordinating Growth Initiatives in Multi-Unit Firms

Long Range Planning

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 6-32

  Lechner, Christoph ^a   Kreutzer, Markus ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COORDINATION MODES; CORPORATE GROWTH; CORPORATE MANAGEMENT; GROWTH INITIATIVES; MULTI-UNIT; SELF-ORGANISING;

MANAGERS;

MANAGEMENT;

CORPORATE STRATEGY; ECONOMIC GROWTH; FIRM SIZE; INDUSTRIAL PERFORMANCE; MANAGEMENT;

ASIA; EUROPE; NORTH AMERICA;

EID: 73949141425     PISSN: 00246301     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.lrp.2009.10.002     Document Type: Article

References (97)

1. Bhardwaj G., Camillus J.C., and Hounshell D.A. Continual corporate entrepreneurial search for long-term growth. Management Science 52 2 (2006) 248-261
2. Penrose E. The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. 3rd edn (1995), Oxford University Press, Oxford
3. Raisch S. Balanced structures: designing organisations for profitable growth. Long Range Planning 41 5 (2008) 483-508
4. Raisch S., and von Krogh G. Navigating a path to smart growth. MIT Sloan Management Review 48 3 (2007) 65-72
5. Wolcott R.C., and Lippitz M.J. The four models of corporate entrepreneurship. MIT Sloan Management Review 49 1 (2007) 75-82
6. In: Zahra S.A. (Ed). Corporate Entrepreneurship and Growth (2005), An Elgar Reference Collection, Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, MA, USA
7. Goold M. The growth imperative. Long Range Planning 32 1 (1999) 127-129
8. This definition is consistent with. Lechner C., and Floyd S.W. Searching, processing, codifying and practising - key learning activities in exploratory initiatives. Long Range Planning 40 1 (2007) 9-29
9. In a study on explorative initiatives, about 60 per cent of all initiatives did not reach satisfactory results (op. cit. 3).
10. This corresponds with other studies showing similar results for strategic initiatives such as. Burgers J.H., Van Den Bosch F.A.J., and Volberda H.W. Why new business development projects fail: coping with the differences of technological versus market knowledge. Long Range Planning 41 1 (2008) 55-73
11. McGrath R.G. Exploratory learning, innovative capacity, and managerial oversight. Academy of Management Journal 44 1 (2001) 118-131
12. McGrath R.G., MacMillan I.C., and Venkataraman S. Defining and developing competence - a strategic process paradigm. Strategic Management Journal 16 4 (1995) 251-275
13. Olsen M.S., van Bever D., and Verry S. When growth stalls. Harvard Business Review 86 3 (2008) 50-61
14. Leonard-Barton D. Core capabilities and core rigidities - a paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management Journal 13 Special Issue S1 (1992) 111-125
15. For an analysis of the different growth mechanisms, see for example. Dyer J.H., Kale P., and Singh H. When to ally and when to acquire. Harvard Business Review 82 7-8 (2004) 108-115
16. Treacy M. Double-digit Growth: How Great Companies Achieve it - no Matter What (2003), Penguin Group, New York
17. Wang L., and Zajac E.J. Alliance or acquisition? A dyadic perspective on interfirm resource combinations. Strategic Management Journal 28 13 (2007) 1291-1317
18. Other studies analysed companies' optimal growth rates based on well-established research on the sustainable growth model. A recent analysis of Fortune Global 500 companies, for example, shows that firms should stay in a certain growth corridor between their minimum and maximum growth rate to outperform their competitors. Raisch S., and von Krogh G. Navigating a path to smart growth. MIT Sloan Management Review 48 3 (2007) 65-72
19. Nag R., Hambrick D.C., and Chen M.J. What is strategic management, really? Inductive derivation of a consensus definition of the field. Strategic Management Journal 28 9 (2007) 935-955
20. Ghoshal S., and Bartlett C.A. Linking organizational context and managerial action - the dimensions of quality of management. Strategic Management Journal 15 Special Issue S1 (1994) 91-112
21. For the significance of strategic initiatives in research on corporate entrepreneurship and strategic renewal in particular, see, for example. Birkinshaw J. Entrepreneurship in multinational corporations: the characteristics of subsidiary initiatives. Strategic Management Journal 18 3 (1997) 207-229
22. Bower J.L. Managing the Resource Allocation Process (1970), Harvard University, Boston
23. Burgelman R.A. A model of the interaction of strategic behavior, corporate context, and the concept of strategy. Academy of Management Review 8 1 (1983) 61-70
24. Floyd S.W., and Lane P.J. Strategizing throughout the organization: managing role conflict in strategic renewal. Academy of Management Review 25 1 (2000) 154-177
25. Wielemaker M.W., Volberda H.W., Elfring T., and Baden-Fuller C. The conditioning and knowledge-creating view: managing strategic initiatives in large firms. In: Pettigrew A.M., Thomas H., and Whittington R. (Eds). Handbook of Strategy and Management vol. 1 (2002), Sage Publications, London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi 164-190
26. Zahra S.A., Nielsen A.P., and Bogner W.C. Corporate entrepreneurship, knowledge, and competence development. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 23 3 (1999) 169-189
27. Burgelman R.A. Intraorganizational ecology of strategy making and organizational adaptation: theory and field research. Organization Science 2 3 (1991) 239-262
28. Burgelman R.A. Fading memories - a process theory of strategic business exit in dynamic environments. Administrative Science Quarterly 39 1 (1994) 24-56
29. Burgelman R.A. Strategy is Destiny. How Strategy-making Shapes a Company's Future (2002), The Free Press, New York
30. Chakravarthy B.S., Müller-Stewens G., Lorange P., and Lechner C. Defining the contours of the strategy process field. In: Chakravarthy B.S., Müller-Stewens G., Lorange P., and Lechner C. (Eds). Strategy Process. Shaping the Contours of the Field vol. 1 (2003), Blackwell Publishing, Malden 1-17
31. Lovas B., and Ghoshal S. Strategy as guided evolution. Strategic Management Journal 21 9 (2000) 875-896
32. See the Bower-Burgelman process model of strategy-making for the role of the structural and strategic context. Bower J.L. Managing the Resource Allocation Process (1970), Harvard University, Boston
33. Burgelman R.A. A process model of internal corporate venturing in the diversified major firm. Administrative Science Quarterly 28 2 (1983) 223-244
34. For the social context as an important third internal selection mechanism, see K. Marx and C. Lechner, The role of the social context for strategy making: examining the impact of embeddedness on the performance of strategic initiatives, in: S. W. Floyd, J. Roos, C. D. Jacobs and F. W. Kellermans (eds.), Innovating Strategy Process: 135-148 (2005).
35. Op. cit. 5.
36. See, for example. Barnard C.I. The Functions of the Executive. Thirtieth Anniversary Edition (1938), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
37. Fayol H. Administration industrielle et générale (1916), H. Dunod et E. Pinat Editeurs, Paris
38. Lawrence P.R., and Lorsch J.W. Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration (1967), Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA
39. March J.G., and Simon H. Organizations (1958), Wiley, New York, NY
40. Thompson J.D. Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory (1967), McGraw-Hill, New York, NY
41. Van de Ven A.H., Delbaq A.L., and Koenig Jr. R. Determinants of coordination modes within organizations. American Sociological Review 41 April (1976) 322-338
42. Thompson J.D. Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory (1967), McGraw-Hill, New York, NY op. cit. 14
43. This distinction is consistent with the work of Crowston who differentiated dependencies to be coordinated in goals (content) and activities (process). Crowston K. A coordination theory approach to organizational process design. Organization Science 8 2 (1997) 157-175
44. Malone T.W., and Crowston K. The interdisciplinary study of coordination. ACM Computing Surveys 26 1 (1994) 87-119
45. In line with previous studies, we distinguish between three generic types of coordination mechanisms: centralisation, formalisation, and informal social relations. Jansen J.J.P., Van den Bosch F.A.J., and Volberda H.W. Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Science 52 11 (2006) 1661-1674
46. Jansen J.J.P., Van Den Bosch F.A.J., and Volberda H.W. Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and ambidexterity: the impact of environmental and organizational antecedents. Schmalenbach Business Review 57 October (2005) 351-363
47. For the recent focus on informal social relations as another generic type of coordination mechanisms, see, for example. Cardinal L.B. Technology innovation in the pharmaceutical industry: the use of organizational control in managing research and development. Organization Science 12 1 (2001) 1-18
48. Cardinal L.B., Sitkin S.B., and Long C.P. Balancing and rebalancing in the creation and evolution of organizational control. Organization Science 15 4 (2004) 411-431
49. Nahapiet J., and Ghoshal S. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review 23 2 (1998) 242-266
50. Tsai W.P. Social structure of "Coopetition" within a multiunit organization: coordination, competition, and intraorganizational knowledge sharing. Organization Science 13 2 (2002) 179-190
51. A high degree of competitive rivalry can often be found in industries characterised by factors such as high fixed costs, chronic overcapacity, low levels of product differentiation, industry growth, barriers to entry and industry concentration. See, for example. Porter M.E. Industry structure and competitive strategy: Keys to profitability. Financial Analysts Journal 36 4 (1980) 30-41
52. Porter M.E. Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance (1985), Macmillan, New York
53. Ferrier W.J. Navigating the competitive landscape: the drivers and consequences of competitive aggressiveness. Academy of Management Journal 44 4 (2001) 858-877
54. For an overview of competitive dynamics research see, for example. Smith K.G., Ferrier W.J., and Ndofor H. Competitive dynamics research: critique and future directions. In: Hitt M.A., Freeman R.E., and Harrison J.S. (Eds). The Blackwell Handbook of Strategic Management (2001), Blackwell Publishers Inc., Oxford 315-361
55. Environmental turbulence can be characterised by the simultaneous effects of dynamism and complexity. See, for example. Dess G.G., and Beard D.W. Dimensions of organizational task environments. Administrative Science Quarterly 29 1 (1984) 52-73
56. Andersen T.J. Integrating the strategy formation process: An international perspective. European Management Journal 22 3 (2004) 263-272
57. This mode is similar to what Lovas and Ghoshal have termed "guided evolution". Lovas B., and Ghoshal S. Strategy as guided evolution. Strategic Management Journal 21 9 (2000) 875-896
58. See, for example. Zook C., and Allen J. Growth outside the core. Harvard Business Review 81 12 (2003) 66-73
59. García-Casarejos N., Alcalde-Fradejas N., and Espitia-Escuer M. Staying close to the core: lessons from studying the costs of unrelated alliances in Spanish banking. Long Range Planning 42 2 (2009) 194-215
60. Kim W.C., and Mauborgne R. Fair process: managing in the knowledge economy. Harvard Business Review 75 4 (1997) 65-75
61. All corporations in our sample operated as multi-business unit structures with a corporate centre. However, the diversification of these businesses differed from firm to firm.
62. Due to confidentiality agreements, we have changed the name of the company.
63. For an article focusing on the flexibility and responsiveness required for coping with extremely turbulent environments, see, for example. Chakravarthy B. A new strategy framework for coping with turbulence. Sloan Management Review 38 2 (1997) 69-82
64. Cyert R.M., and March J.G. A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (1963), Prentice-Hall Inc., New Jersey, USA
65. See. Keegan A., and Turner J.R. The management of innovation in project-based firms. Long Range Planning 35 4 (2002) 367-388 for a similar example of a financial services firm in which a self-organising system of innovation projects resulted in political battles and resource wars
66. For example, the following studies have called for research combining formal and informal control mechanisms. Jaworski B.J.V., Stathakopoulos J.V., and Krishnan H.S. Control combinations in marketing - conceptual framework and empirical evidence. Journal of Marketing 57 1 (1993) 57-69
67. Cardinal L.B., Sitkin S.B., and Long C.P. Balancing and rebalancing in the creation and evolution of organizational control. Organization Science 15 4 (2004) 411-431
68. For studies analysing the interaction effect of centralisation, formalisation, and informal social relations on exploitative or exploratory activities, see. Jansen J.J.P., Van Den Bosch F.A.J., and Volberda H.W. Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and ambidexterity: the impact of environmental and organizational antecedents. Schmalenbach Business Review 57 October (2005) 351-363
69. L. B. Cardinal, S. B. Sitkin and C. P. Long, op. cit. 29.
70. Van de Ven A.H., Delbaq A.L., and Koenig Jr. R. Determinants of coordination modes within organizations. American Sociological Review 41 April (1976) 322-338
71. This is in line with the other studies analysing the combined effect of these coordination mechanisms: op. cit. 29.
72. Crossan M.M., and Berdrow I. Organizational learning and strategic renewal. Strategic Management Journal 24 11 (2003) 1087-1105
73. Huff J.O., Huff A.S., and Thomas H. Strategic renewal and the interaction of cumulative stress and inertia. Strategic Management Journal 13 Special Issue (1992) 55-75
74. Leonard-Barton D. Core capabilities and core rigidities - a paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management Journal 13 Special Issue S1 (1992) 111-125
75. Volberda H.W., Baden-Fuller C., and van den Bosch F.A.J. Mastering strategic renewal - mobilising renewal journeys in multi-unit firms. Long Range Planning 34 2 (2001) 159-178
76. Schreyögg G., and Kliesch-Eberl M. How dynamic can organizational capabilities be? Towards a dual-process model of capability dynamization. Strategic Management Journal 28 9 (2007) 913-933
77. For research theorising on the influence of task uncertainty on the use of coordination mechanisms, see, for example. March J.G., and Simon H. Organizations (1958), Wiley, New York, NY
78. J.D. Thompson, op. cit. 15
79. Keegan A., and Turner J.R. The management of innovation in project-based firms. Long Range Planning 35 4 (2002) 367-388
80. and A. H. Van de Ven, A. L. Delbaq and R. Koenig Jr., op. cit. 31
81. These studies found support for the substitution between alternative coordination mechanisms. This is consistent with research on exploration and exploitation which require different styles of management and organisational arrangements. O'Reilly C.A., and Tushman M.L. The ambidextrous organization. Harvard Business Review 82 4 (2004) 74-81
82. For the literature on strategy-making, see, for example. Burgelman R.A. Intraorganizational ecology of strategy making and organizational adaptation: theory and field research. Organization Science 2 3 (1991) 239-262
83. Burgelman R.A. Strategy is Destiny. How Strategy-making Shapes a Company's Future (2002), The Free Press, New York
84. The "emergent-versus-planning" debate was initiated by Igor Ansoff and Henry Mintzberg regarding the contributions of synoptic, deliberate approaches to strategy-making versus more emergent and incremental methods. Ansoff I.H. Critique to Henry Mintzberg's "the design school: reconsidering the basic premises on strategic management". Strategic Management Journal 12 6 (1991) 449-461
85. Mintzberg H. The design school: reconsidering the basic premises on strategic management. Strategic Management Journal 11 3 (1990) 171-195
86. see also. Mintzberg H., and Waters J.A. Of strategies, deliberate and emergent. Strategic Management Journal 6 3 (1985) 257-272
87. Hart S.L. An integrative framework for strategy-making processes. Academy of Management Review 17 2 (1992) 327-351
88. Hart S.L., and Banbury C. How strategy-making processes can make a difference. Strategic Management Journal 15 4 (1994) 251-269
89. Campbell A., Goold M., and Alexander M. Corporate-strategy - the quest for parenting advantage. Harvard Business Review 73 2 (1995) 120-132
90. Collis D.J., Young D., and Goold M. The size, structure, and performance of corporate headquarters. Strategic Management Journal 28 4 (2007) 383-405
91. Goold M. Strategic control in the decentralized firm. Sloan Management Review 32 2 (1991) 69-81
92. Goold M., and Campbell A. Brief case - from corporate strategy to parenting advantage. Long Range Planning 24 1 (1991) 115-117
93. Goold M., and Campbell A. Parenting in complex structures. Long Range Planning 35 3 (2002) 219-243
94. Goold M., Campbell A., and Alexander M. Corporate-level Strategy. Creating Value in the Multibusiness Company (1994), John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York
95. Goold M., Campbell A., and Alexander M. Corporate strategy and parenting theory. Long Range Planning 31 2 (1998) 308-314
96. Sadtler D.R. Brief case: the long road to parenting advantage. Long Range Planning 26 2 (1993) 125-127
97. This note of caution is justified by the high failure rates of change initiatives. See, for example. Beer M., and Nohria N. Cracking the code of change. Harvard Business Review 78 3 (2000) 133-141 which reports that 70 per cent of all change initiatives fail