Record media used by primary care providers in medically underserved regions of upstate New York was not pivotal to clinical result in the Informatics for Diabetes Education and Telemedicine (IDEATel) project

Informatics in Primary Care

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 103-112

  Morin, Philip C ^a   Thomas Wolff, L ^b   Eimicke, Joseph P ^c   Teresi, Jeanne A ^d,e   Shea, Steven ^f   Weinstock, Ruth S ^a,g  

^a State University of New York Upstate Medical University: College of Medicine   (United States)

^b SUNY UPSTATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Hebrew Home for the Aged   (United States)

^d Hebrew Home for the Aged   (United States)

^e NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

^f Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^g SYRACUSE VA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Diabetes; Health information technology; Telemedicine

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIABETES MELLITUS; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT EDUCATION; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TELEMEDICINE; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; DIABETES MELLITUS; FEMALE; HEALTH RECORDS, PERSONAL; HUMANS; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD LINKAGE; MEDICALLY UNDERSERVED AREA; MIDDLE AGED; NEW YORK; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; TELEMEDICINE;

EID: 73949116538     PISSN: 14760320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14236/jhi.v17i2.722     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Brailer DJ. The Decade of Health Information Technology: delivering consumer-centric and information-rich health care. Washington, DC: Office for the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONCHIT), 2004 (accessed 26 February 2008). Available from: www.hhs.gov/healthit/documents/ hitframework/pdf
2. Hing ES, Burt CW and Woodwell DA. Electronic Medical Record Use by Office-based Physicians and Their Practices: United States, 2006. Advance data from vital and health statistics; no. 393. Hyattsville, Maryland: National Center for Health Statistics, 2007.
3. Cory C and Grossman JM. Clinical Information Technology Adoption Varies Across Physician Specialties. Data Bulletin no. 34. Washington, DC: The Center for Studying Health System Change. September 2007 (accessed 16 May 2008). Available from: hschange.com/CONTENT/ 945/
4. Burt CW, Hing E and Woodwell D. Electronic Medical Record Use by Office-based Physicians: United States, 2005. Hyattsville, Maryland: National Center for Health Statistics, 2006 (accessed 16 May 2008). Available from: www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/pubs/pubd/hestats/elec- tronic/electronic.htm
5. Kibbe DC, Waldren SE and Spikol L. AAFP 2005 EHR Survey. Washington, DC: The Center For Health Information Technology (accessed 16 May 2008). Available from: www.centerforhit.org/prebuilt/chit2005ehrsurvey.pdf
6. Baxley E, Campbell T and the Association of Departments of Family Medicine. Electronic health records in academic family medicine practices: a tale of progress and opportunity. Annals of Family Medicine 2008;6:87-8.
7. Medical Records Institute. Medical Records Institute's Eighth Annual Survey of Electronic Health Record Trends and Usage for 2006 (accessed 16 May 2008). Available from: www.medrecinst.com/PDFs/EHRSURVEY-2006.pdf
8. Menachemi N, Perkins RM, van Durme DJ and Brooks RG. Examining the adoption of electronic health records and personal digital assistants by family physicians in Florida. Informatics in Primary Care 2006;14:1-9. (Pubitemid 43834047)
9. One-third of Texas physicians use EHRs, new study finds (accessed 17 June 2008). Available from: www.ihealthbeat.org/articles/2008/5/28
10. Audet AM, Davis K and Schoenbaum SC. Adoption of patient-centered care practices by physicians: results from a national survey. Archives of Internal Medicine 2006;166:754-9.
11. DesRoches CM, Campbell EG, Sowmya RR et al. Electronic health records in ambulatory care: a national survey of physicians. New England Journal of Medicine 2008;359:50-60 (accessed 19 June 2008). Available from: www.nejm.org. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa0802005 (Pubitemid 351931096)
12. Westin AF. Americans Overwhelmingly Believe Electronic Personal Health Records Could Improve Their Health. New York: Connecting for Health; The Markle Foundation (accessed 17 June 2008). Available from: www.connectingforhealth.org/ resources/researchbrief200806(1).pdf
13. Cherry DK, Hing EH, Woodwell BA and Rechtsteiner EA. National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2006 summary national health statistics reports; no. 3. Hyattsville, Maryland: National Center for Health Statistics, 2008.
14. Blumenthal D and Glaser JP. Information technology comes to medicine. New England Journal of Medicine 2007;356:2527-34.
15. Rosenthal TC. Advancing Medical Homes: evidence- based literature review to inform health policy (accessed 23 May 2008). Available from: www.ahec.buffalo.edu
16. Celeste-Harris S and Maryniuk M. Educating medical office staff: enhancing diabetes care in primary care offices. Diabetes Spectrum 2006;19:84-9 (accessed 23 May 2008). Available from:spectrum.diabetesjournals.org/content/ vol19/issue2 (Pubitemid 44898239)
17. Janes GR. Ambulatory medical care for diabetes. In: Diabetes in America (2e). Bethesda, MD: National Diabetes Information Clearinghouse, 1995, pp. 541-52.
18. Beaser RS. Joslin's Diabetes Handbook: a guide for primarycare providers. Boston, MA: Joslin Diabetes Center, 2003.
19. Fortin M, Bravo G, Hudon C, Vanasse A and La Pointe L. Prevalence of multimorbidity among adults seen in family practice. Annals of Family Medicine 2005;3:223- 8 (accessed 23 July 2008). Available from: www.annfammed.org/cgi/ reprintframed/3/3/223
20. Shea S, Starren J, Weinstock RS et al. Columbia University's Informatics for Diabetes Education and Telemedicine (IDEATel) project rationale and design. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2002;9:49-62.
21. Shea S, Weinstock RS, Starren J et al. A randomized trial comparing telemedicine case management with usual care in older, ethnically diverse, medically underserved patients with diabetes mellitus. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2006;13:40-51. (Pubitemid 41828334)
22. Tudiver F, Wolff LW, Morin PC et al. Primary care providers' perceptions of home diabetes telemedicine care in the IDEATel Project. Journal of Rural Health 2007;23:55-61. (Pubitemid 46161051)
23. Electronic Medical Records (accessed 4 May 2008). Available from: quickdictate.net/medical/emr.asp
24. Health IT Definitions and Acronyms. Medical Records Institute Press Room (accessed 9 April 2008). Available from: www.medrecinst.com/press/definitions. html
25. Crosson JC, Obman-Strickland PA, Hahn KA et al. Electronic medical records and diabetes quality of care: results from a sample of family medicine practices. Annals of Family Medicine 2007;5:209-15.
26. Orzano AJ, Strickland PO, Tallia AF et al. Improving outcomes for high-risk diabetics using information systems. Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine 2007;20:245-51.
27. Lorence DP, Spink A and Richards MC. EPR adoption and dual record maintenance in the US: assessing variation in medical systems infrastructure. Journal of Medical Systems 2002;26:357-67. (Pubitemid 38420742)
28. Dolan PL. Insurer finds EMRs won't pay off for its doctors. AMNews March2008(accessed4March2008). Available from: www.ama-assn.org/amednews/2008/ 03/10/bi120310.htm
29. Menachemi N. Barriers to ambulatory EHR: who are 'imminent adopters' and how do they differ from other physicians? Informatics in Primary Care 2006;14:101-8. (Pubitemid 44687601)
30. Fried BM. Gauging the Progress of the National Health Information Technology Initiative: perspectives from the field. Oakland, Ca: California HealthCare Foundation, 2008.
31. Linder JA, Ma J, Bates DW, Middleton B and Stafford RS. Electronic health record use and the quality of ambulatory care in the United States. Archives of Internal Medicine 2007;167:1400-5.
32. Kim C, Neil Steers W, Herman WH, Mangione CM, Venkat Narayan KM and Ettner SL. Physician compensation from salary and quality of diabetes care. Journal of General Internal Medicine 2007;22:448-52. (Pubitemid 46941208)
33. Hayward RA. Performance measurement in search ofa path. New England Journal of Medicine 2007;356:951-3.
34. Audet A-M J, Doty MM, Shamasdin J and Schoenbaum SC. Physician's Views on Quality of Care: findings from the commonwealth fund national survey of physicians and quality of care. New York, NY: The Commonwealth Fund, 2005.
35. de Lusignan S, Teasdale S, Little D et al. Comprehensive computerised primary care records are an essential component of any national health information strategy: report from an international consensus conference. Informatics in Primary Care 2004;12:255-64. (Pubitemid 40347662)
36. de Lusignan S and Chan T. The development of primary care information technology in the United Kingdom. Journal ofAmbulatory Care Management 2008;31:201- 10
37. de Lusignan S and Katic M. UK and Croatia: family practice, its medical records and computerisation in the context of an enlarged Europe. Informatics in Primary Care 2007;15:169-73. (Pubitemid 350148595)
38. Tahrani AA, McCarthy M, Godson J et al. Diabetes care and the new GMS contract: the evidence for a whole country. British Journal of General Practice 2007;57:483-5. (Pubitemid 46894988)
39. Gadsby KK, Millett C, Majeed A and Davies M. Quality of diabetes care in the UK: comparison of published quality-of-care reports with results of the Quality and Outcomes Framework for Diabetes. Diabetic Medicine 2007;24:436-41. (Pubitemid 350179431)
40. Blumenthal D. Stimulating the adoption of health information technology. New England Journal of Medicine 2009;360:1477-9 (accessed 31 March 2009). Available from: content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/NEJMp0901592
41. Tang PC and Lee TH. Your doctor's office or the Internet? Two paths to personal health records. New England Journal of Medicine 2009;360:1276-8.
42. Demiris G, Courtney K L and Meyer W. Current status and perceived needs of information technology in Critical Access Hospitals: a survey study. Informatics in Primary Care 2007;15:45-51. (Pubitemid 47322185)
43. Chin T. Infotech tipping point? (HIMSS meeting). AMNews 14 March 2005 (cited 17 June 2008). Available from: www.ama-assn.org/amednews/2005/03/14/ bisa0314.htm