Physician compensation from salary and quality of diabetes care

Journal of General Internal Medicine

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 448-452

  Kim, Catherine ^a   Steers, W Neil ^b   Herman, William H ^c   Mangione, Carol M ^b   Narayan, K M Venkat ^d   Ettner, Susan L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^d NATIONAL CENTER FOR CHRONIC DISEASE PREVENTION AND HEALTH PROMOTION   (United States)

Author keywords

Compensation; Diabetes; Managed care; Quality

Indexed keywords

ACETYLSALICYLIC ACID; ANTIDIABETIC AGENT; HEMOGLOBIN A1C; INSULIN; LIPID;

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPENSATION; CONFOUNDING VARIABLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; COVARIANCE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DIABETES CONTROL; DIABETES MELLITUS; EYE EXAMINATION; FEMALE; FOOT; GLYCEMIC CONTROL; HEALTH CARE ACCESS; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEMOGLOBIN DETERMINATION; HUMAN; INFLUENZA VACCINATION; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; LIPID ANALYSIS; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MALE; MANAGED CARE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; PHYSICIAN INCOME; PROTEINURIA; SALARY; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; AGED; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ECONOMICS; MIDDLE AGED; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; PHYSICIAN; SALARY AND FRINGE BENEFIT;

ADULT; AGED; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSICIANS; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; SALARIES AND FRINGE BENEFITS;

EID: 34250192607     PISSN: 08848734     EISSN: 15251497     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11606-007-0124-5     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington, D.C.: Institute of Medicine; 2001.
2. Hillman A. Health maintenance organizations, financial incentives, physician's judgments. Ann Intern Med. 1990;112:891-3.
3. Tufano J, Conrad D, Liang S. Addressing physician compensation and practice productivity. J Ambul Care Manage. 1999;22(3):47-57.
4. Glass K, Pieper L, Berlin M. Incentive-based physician compensation models. J Ambul Care Manage. 1999;22(3):36-46.
5. Goldfarb S. The utility of decision support, clinical guidelines, and financial incentives as tools to achieve improved clinical performance. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1999;25(3):137-44.
6. Conrad D, Maynard C, Cheadle A, et al. Primary care physician compensation method in medical groups. Does it influence the use and cost of health services for enrollees in managed care organizations? JAMA. 1998;279(11):853-8.
7. Keating N, Landrum M, Landon B, et al. The influence of physicians' practice management strategies and financial arrangements on quality of care among patients with diabetes. Med Care. 2004;42:829-39.
8. Rosenthal M, Frank R, Li Z, Epstein A. Early experience with pay-for-performance: from concept to practice. JAMA. 2005;294(14):1788-93.
9. Ettner S, Thompson T, Stevens M, et al. Are physician reimbursement strategies associated with processes of care and patient satisfaction for patients with diabetes in managed care? Health Serv Res. 2006;41(4 pt 1):1221-41.
10. Dudley R, Miller R, Korenbrot T, Luft H. The impact of financial incentives on quality of health care. Milbank Q. 1998;76(4):649-86.
11. Armour B, Pitts M, Maclean R, et al. The effect of explicit financial incentives on physician behavior. Arch Intern Med. 2001;161:1261-6.
12. Bateman D, Campbell M, Donaldson L, Roberts S, Smith J. A prescribing incentive scheme for non-fundholding general practices: an observational study. BMJ. 1996;313:533-8.
13. Hillman A, Pauly M, Kerstein J. How do financial incentives affect physicians' clinical decisions and the financial performance of health maintenance organizations? N Engl J Med. 1989;321:86-92.
14. Rosenthal MB, Fernandopulle R, Song H, Landon B. Paying for quality: providers' incentives for quality improvement. Health Aff. 2004;23(2):127-41.
15. TRIAD Study Group. The Translating Research Into Action for Diabetes (TRIAD) study: a multicenter study of diabetes in managed care. Diabetes Care. 2002;25(2):386-9.
16. Brown A, Gregg E, Stevens M, et al. Race, ethnicity, socioeconomic position, and quality of care for adults with diabetes enrolled in managed care: the Translating Research Into Action for Diabetes (TRIAD) study. Diabetes Care. 2005;28(12):2864-70.
17. Ackermann R, Thompson T, Selby J, et al. Is the number of documented diabetes process-of-care indicators associated with cardiometabolic risk factor levels, patient satisfaction, or self-rated quality of diabetes care? The Translating Research Into Action for Diabetes (TRIAD) study. Diabetes Care. 2006;29(9):2108-13.
18. CAHPS 2.0 Survey and Reporting Kit [computer program]. Version. Rockville, MD: AHCPR; 1998.
19. Kerr E, Smith D, Hogan M, et al. Building a better quality measure: are some patients with 'poor quality' actually getting good care? Med Care. 2003;41(10):1173-82.
20. Charlson M, Pompei P, Ales K, MacKenzie C. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373-83.
21. King G, Tomz M, Wittenberg J. Making the most of statistical analysis: improving interpretation and presentation. Am J Political Science. 2000;44(2):341-55.
22. Mangione C, Gerzoff R, Williamson D, et al. Influence of diabetes disease management on quality of care: the TRIAD study. Ann Intern Med. 2006;145(2):107-16.
23. Kim C, Williamson D, Mangione C, et al. Managed care organization and the quality of diabetes care: the Translating Research Into Action for Diabetes (TRIAD) study. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(7):1529-34.