Grading in competence-based qualifications – Is it desirable and how might it affect validity?

Journal of Further and Higher Education

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 175-184

  Johnson, Martin ^a  

^a University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

assessment; competency based; grading; validity

Indexed keywords

EID: 73949094536     PISSN: 0309877X     EISSN: 14699486     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03098770801979183     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Bandura, A., 1986. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
2. Boreham, N, Samurçay, R, and Fischer, M, eds. 2002. Work process knowledge, London: Routledge.
3. Curtis, D. D., 2004. “ The assessment of generic skills. ”. In Generic skills in vocational education and training: Research findings, Edited by: Gibb, J. Station Arcade, South Australia: NCVER.
4. Dreyfus, H. L., and Dreyfus, S. E., 1986. Mind over machine: The power of human intuition and expertise in the age of the computer, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
5. Ecclestone, K., 2004. Learning in a comfort zone: Cultural and social capital inside an outcome-based assessment regime. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 11 (1): 29–48.
6. Gillis, S., and Bateman, A., 1999. Assessing in VET: Issues of reliability and validity, Kensington Park, South Australia: NCVER.
7. Gillis, S., Griffin, P., Trembath, R., and Ling, P., 1998. “ The examination of the theoretical underpinning of assessment. ”. Melbourne, Australia: Univ. of Melbourne. A report of a research project funded by the Australian National Training Authority Research Advisory Council, unpublished.
8. Gonczi, A., 1994. Competency based assessment in the professions in Australia. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 1 (1): 27–44.
9. Griffin, P., Gillis, S., Keating, J., and Fennessy, D., 2001. Assessment and reporting of VET courses within senior secondary certificates, Sydney: NSW Board of Vocational Education and Training.
10. Hager, P., Athanasou, J., and Gonczi, A., 1994. Assessment technical manual, Canberra, ACT: Department of Employment, Education and Training; Australian Government Publishing.
11. Hanf, G., and Hippach-Schneider, U., 2005. What purpose do national qualifications frameworks serve? A look at other countries, Bonn: Federal Institute for Vocational Education and Training.
12. Hyland, T., 1994. Competence, education and NVQs: Dissenting perspectives, London: Cassell Education.
13. Ingenkamp, K., 1977. Educational assessment, Windsor, UK: National Foundation for Educational Research.
14. Johnson, M., 2006. A review of vocational research in the UK 2002–2006: Measurement and accessibility issues. International Journal of Training Research, 4 (2): 48–71.
15. Johnson, M., 2007. Does the anticipation of a merit grade motivate vocational test takers?. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 12 (2): 159–79.
16. Jones, A., 1999. The place of judgement in competency-based assessment. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 51 (1): 145–60.
17. Laming, D., 2004. Human judgment: The eye of the beholder, London: Thomson Learning.
18. Lave, J., and Wenger, E., 1991. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
19. Messick, S., 1989. “ Validity. ”. In Educational measurement, Edited by: Linn, R. L. Washington, DC: American Council on Education/Macmillan.
20. Messick, S., The interplay of evidence and consequences in the validation of performance assessments: Research report. Paper presented to the Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, April, in San Francisco, CA, USA
21. Newton, P. E., 2005. The public understanding of measurement inaccuracy. British Journal of Educational Research, 31 (4): 419–42.
22. Oates, T., 2004. The role of outcomes-based qualifications in the development of an effective vocational education and training (VET) system. Policy Futures in Education, 2 (1): 53–71.
23. Peddie, R. A., 1997. Some issues in using competency based assessments in selection decisions. Queensland Journal of Educational Research, 13 (3): 16–45.
24. Qualifications and Curriculum Authority (QCA). 2004. The statutory regulation of external qualifications in England, Wales and Northern Ireland, London: QCA.
25. Qualifications and Curriculum Authority (QCA). 2005. “ The framework for achievement. Report to the Department for Education and Skills on the outcomes of the stakeholder consultation. ”. London: QCA.
26. Quality Assurance Agency (QAA). 2001. The framework for higher education qualifications in England, Wales and Northern Ireland, Gloucester, UK: QAA.
27. Quirk, R., 1995. Reporting of achievement in a competency-based education and training system, Sydney: Assessment Centre for Vocational Education.
28. Savory, C., Hodgson, A., and Spours, K., 2003. The Advanced Vocational Certificate of Education (AVCE): A general or vocational qualification?, London: University of London Institute of Education.
29. Schofield, K., and McDonald, R., 2004. “ Moving on … Report of the High Level Review into Training Packages. ”. Melbourne, Australia: ANTA.
30. Security Industry Authority (SIA). 2007. Get licensed: SIA licensing criteria, Liverpool: SIA.
31. Smith, L. R., 2000. Issues impacting on the quality of assessment in vocational education and training in Queensland, Brisbane, Australia: Department of Employment, Training and Industrial Relations.
32. Spours, K., Savory, C., and Hodgson, A., 2002. Curriculum 2000: The significance of the learner experience in the reform of advanced level qualifications, London: University of London Institute of Education.
33. Stanton, G., 2004. The organisation of full-time 14–19 provision in the state sector. Working Paper 13, Oxford, UK: University of Oxford, Nuffield Review of 14–19 Education and Training.
34. Stowell, R., 2000. “ Achieving consistency in competency-based assessment. ”. Presentation to VETASSESS seminar, October, in Melbourne, Australia
35. Wikström, C., 2005. Grade stability in a criterion-referenced grading system: The Swedish example. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 12 (2): 125–44.
36. Wiliam, D., 1993. Validity, dependability and reliability in national curriculum assessment. The Curriculum Journal, 4 (3): 335–50.
37. Wiliam, D., Construct-referenced assessment of authentic tasks: Alternatives to norms and criteria. Paper presented at the 24th Annual Conference of the International Association for Educational Assessment, May, in Barbados
38. Wiliam, D., 2000. Reliability, validity, and all that jazz. Education 3–13, 29 (3): 9–13.
39. Williams, M., and Bateman, A., 2003. Graded assessment in vocational education and training, Kensington Park, South Australia: NCVER.
40. Wolf, A., 1995. Competence-based assessment, Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
41. Wood, R., 1991. Assessment and testing: a survey of research, Cambridge, UK: University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate.