Difference in percentage of ventricular pacing between two algorithms for minimizing ventricular pacing: Results of the IDEAL RVP (Identify the Best Algorithm for Reducing Unnecessary Right Ventricular Pacing) study

Europace

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 96-102

  Murakami, Yoshimasa ^a   Tsuboi, Naoya ^b   Inden, Yasuya ^c   Yoshida, Yukihiko ^d   Murohara, Toyoaki ^c   Ihara, Zenichi ^e   Takami, Mitsuaki ^e  

^a City of Nagoya   (Japan)

^b CHUKYO HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^c NAGOYA UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^d NAGOYA DAINI RED CROSS HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^e Medtronic Japan   (Japan)

Author keywords

Algorithm; Atrioventricular block; Minimizing ventricular acing; Pacemaker

Indexed keywords

AGED; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL HEART PACEMAKER; ATRIOVENTRICULAR BLOCK; ATRIOVENTRICULAR CONDUCTION; BRADYCARDIA; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSSOVER PROCEDURE; FEMALE; HEART ATRIUM PACING; HEART CONDUCTION; HEART DEPOLARIZATION; HEART PACING; HEART RIGHT VENTRICLE; HUMAN; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; PACEMAKER; PATIENT SELECTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; THORAX PAIN;

AGED; ALGORITHMS; BRADYCARDIA; CARDIAC PACING, ARTIFICIAL; CROSS-OVER STUDIES; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; JAPAN; MALE; THERAPY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VENTRICULAR DYSFUNCTION, LEFT;

EID: 73849104171     PISSN: 10995129     EISSN: 15322092     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/europace/eup252     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Sweeney MO, Hellkamp AS, Ellenbogen KA, Greenspon AJ, Freedman RA, Lee KL et al. Adverse effect of ventricular pacing on heart failure and a trial fibrillation among patients with normal baseline QRS duration in a clinical trial of pacemaker therapy for sinus node dysfunction. Circulation 2003;107:2932-2937
2. Wilkoff BL, Cook JR, Epstein AE, Greene HL, Hallstrom AP, Hsia H et al. Dual-chamber pacing or ventricular backup pacing in patients with an implantable defibrillator: the Dual Chamber and VVI Implantable Defibrillator (DAVID) Trial. JAMA 2002;288:3115-23.
3. Steinberg JS, Fischer A, Wang P, Schuger C, Daubert J, McNitt S et al. The clinical implications of cumulative right ventricular pacing in the multicenter automatic defibrillator trial II. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2005;16:359-365
4. Sweeney MO, Hellkamp AS. Heart failure during cardiac pacing. Circulation 2006; 113:2082-2088
5. Chiladakis JA, Koutsogiannis N, Kalogeropoulos A, Zagli F, Sihlimiris I, Alexopoulos D. Permanent and atrial-synchronized ventricular stimulation for clinically stable patients with normal or impaired left ventricular systolic function. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2007;30:182-187
6. Sweeney MO, Prinzen FW. A new paradigm for physiologic ventricular pacing. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:282-288
7. Flevari P, Leftheriotis D, Fountoulaki K, Panou F, Rigopoulos AG, Paraskevaidis I et al. Long-term nonoutflow septal versus apical right ventricular pacing: relation to left ventricular dyssynchrony. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2009;32:354-362
8. Bildirici U, Vural A, Agacdiken A, Sahin T, Celikyurt U, Kiliçt et al. Comparison of the effects of left vs. right ventricular pacing on left ventricular remodeling. Europace 2008;10:1387-1391
9. Curtis AB, Adamson PB, Chung E, Sutton MS, Tang F, Worley S. Biventricular versus right ventricular pacing in patients with AV block (BLOCK HF): clinical study design and rationale. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2007;18:965-971
10. Milasinovic G, Sperzel J, Smith TW, Mead H, Brandt J, Haisty WK et al. Reduction of RV pacing by continuous optimization of the AV interval. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2006;29:406-412
11. Gillis AM, Pürerfellner H, Israel CW, Sunthorn H, Kacet S, Anelli-Monti M et al. Reducing unnecessary right ventricular pacing with the managed ventricular pacing mode in patients with sinus node disease and AV block. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2006;29:697-705.
12. Olshansky B, Day JD, Moore S, Gering L, Rosenbaum M, McGuire M et al. Is dual-chamber programming inferior to single-chamber programming in an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator? Results of the INTRINSIC RV (Inhibition of Unnecessary RV Pacing With AVSH in ICDs) study. Circulation 2007;115:9-16.
13. Sweeney MO, Ellenbogen KA, Casavant D, Betzold R, Sheldon T, Tang F et al. Multicenter, prospective, randomized safety and efficacy study of a new atrialbased managed ventricular pacing mode (MVP) in dual chamber ICDs. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2005;16:811-817
14. Sweeney MO, Bank AJ, Nsah E, Koullick M, Zeng QC, Hettrick D et al. Minimizing ventricular pacing to reduce a trial fibrillation in sinus-node disease; Search AV Extension and Managed Ventricular Pacing for Promoting Atrioventricular Conduction (SAVE PACe) Trial. N Engl J Med 2007;357:1000-1008
15. Sweeney MO, Ellenbogen KA, Tang AS, Johnson J, Belk P, Sheldon T. Severe atrioventricular decoupling, uncoupling, and ventriculoatrial coupling during enhanced a trial pacing: incidence, mechanisms, and implications for minimizing right ventricular pacing in ICD patients. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2008;19:1175-1180
16. Pürerfellner H, Brandt J, Israel C, Sheldon T, Johnson J, Tscheliessnigg K et al. Comparison of two strategies to reduce ventricular pacing in pacemaker patients. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2008;31:167-176
17. Cheng S, Keyes MJ, Larson MG, McCabe EL, Newton-Cheh C, Levy D et al. Longterm outcomes in individuals with prolonged PR interval or first-degree atrioventricular block. JAMA 2009;301:2571-2577
18. Mansour F, Talajic M, Thibault B, Khairy P. Pacemaker troubleshooting: when MVP is not the most valuable parameter. Heart Rhythm 2006;3:612-614
19. van Mechelen R, Schoonderwoerd R. Risk of managed ventricular pacing in a patient with heart block. Heart Rhythm 2006;3:1384-1385
20. Kaltman JR, Ro PS, Zimmerman F, Moak JP, Epstein M, Zeltser IJ et al. Managed ventricular pacing in pediatric patients and patients with congenital heart disease. Am J Cardiol 2008;102:875-878