Influence of sedation on patients' perceptions and recovery in patients undergoing minor perianal procedures under spinal saddle block

Medical Principles and Practice

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 51-56

  Schmittner, Marc D ^a   Janke, Christoph ^a   Limmer, Marc E ^a   Weiss, Christel ^b   Bussen, Dieter G ^c   Beck, Grietje C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^b University Medical Centre Mannheim   (Germany)

^c Centre of Coloproctology Mannheim   (Germany)

Author keywords

Perianal surgery; Saddle block; Sedation; Spinal anaesthesia

Indexed keywords

BUCAIN; BUPIVACAINE; PROPOFOL; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADULT; ANUS SURGERY; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; BODY WEIGHT; CONVALESCENCE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MICTURITION; NAUSEA; PATIENT MOBILITY; PERCEPTION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; QUESTIONNAIRE; SEDATION; SEX DIFFERENCE; SPINAL ANESTHESIA;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; ANAL CANAL; ANESTHESIA RECOVERY PERIOD; ANESTHESIA, SPINAL; CONSCIOUS SEDATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYPNOTICS AND SEDATIVES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE NAUSEA AND VOMITING; PROPOFOL; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SEX FACTORS;

EID: 73849101788     PISSN: 10117571     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000252835     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Bleday R, Pena JP, Rothenberger DA, Goldberg SM, Buls JG: Symptomatic hemorrhoids: Current incidence and complications of operative therapy. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:477-481.
2. Gudaityte J, Marchertiene I, Pavalkis D: Anesthesia for ambulatory anorectal surgery. Medicina (Kaunas) 2005;40:101-111.
3. Li S, Coloma M, White PF, Watcha MF, Chiu JW, Li H, Huber PJ: Comparison of the cost and recovery profile of three anesthetic techniques for ambulatory anorectal surgery. Anesthesiology 2000;93:1225-1230.
4. Kushwaha R, Hutchings W, Davies C, Rao NG: Randomized clinical trial comparing day-care open haemorrhoidectomy under local versus general anaesthesia. Br J Surg 2008;95:555-563.
5. Korhonen AM: Use of spinal anaesthesia in day surgery. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2006; 19:612-616.
6. Wassef MR, Michaels EI, Rangel JM, Tsyrlin AT: Spinal perianal block: A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison with spinal saddle block. Anesth Analg 2007; 104:1594-1596.
7. Hoehener D, Blumenthal S, Borgeat A: Sedation and regional anaesthesia in the adult patient. Br J Anaesth 2008;100:8-16.
8. Wilson E, David A, MacKenzie N, Grant IS: Sedation during spinal anaesthesia: Comparison of propofol and midazolam. Br J Anaesth 1990;64:48-52.
9. White PF, Negus JB: Sedative infusions during local and regional anaesthesia: A comparison of midazolam and propofol. J Clin Anaesth 1991;3:32-39.
10. Borgeat A, Wilder-Smith OHG, Saiah M, Rifat K: Subhypnotic doses of propofol possess direct antiemetic properties. Anaesth Analg 1992;74:539-541.
11. Wu CL, Naqibuddin M, Fleisher LA: Measurement of patient satisfaction as an outcome of regional anesthesia and analgesia: A systematic review. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2001;26:196-208.
12. Liu SS, Wu CL: The effect of analgesic technique on postoperative patient-reported outcomes including analgesia: A systemic review. Anesth Analg 2007;105:789-808.
13. Chernik DA, Gillings D, Laine H, Hendler J, Silver JM, Davidson AB, Schwam EM, Siegel JL: Validity and reliability of the Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale: Study with intravenous midazolam. J Clin Psychopharmacol 1990;10:244-251.
14. Aldrete JA, Kroulik D: A postanesthetic recovery score. Anesth Analg 1970;49:924-934.
15. Trummel J: Sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopy: The changing landscape. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2007;20:359-364.
16. Read TE, Henry SE, Hovis RM, Fleshman JW, Birnbaum EH, Caushaj PF, Kodner IJ: Prospective evaluation of anaesthetic technique for anorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 2002;45:1553-1560.
17. Sprung J, Bourke DL, Grass J, Hammel J, Mascha E, Thomas P, Tubin I: Predicting the difficult neuraxial block: A prospective study. Anesth Analg 1999;89:384-389.
18. de Oliveiro Filho GR, Gomes HP, da Fonesca MHZ, Hoffman JC: Predictors of successful neuraxial block: A prospective study. J Eur Anaesthesiol 2002;19:447-451.
19. Whiteside JB, Burke D, Wildsmith JAW: Comparison of ropivacaine 0.5% (in glucose 5%) with bupivacaine 0.5% (in glucose 8%) for spinal anaesthesia for elective surgery. Br J Anaesth 2003;90:304-308.
20. Prasad ML, Abcarian H: Urinary retention following operations for benign anorectal diseases. Dis Colon Rectum 1978;21:490-492.
21. Badner NH, Nielson WR, Munk S, Kwiatkowska C, Gelb AW: Preoperative anxiety: detection and contributing factors. Can J Anaesth 1990;37:444-447.
22. Kindler CH, Harms C, Amsler F, Ihde-Scholl T, Scheidegger D: The visual analog scale allows effective measurement of preoperative anxiety and detection of patients' anesthetic concerns. Anesth Analg 2000;90:706-712.
23. Borgeat A, Ekatodramis G, Schenker CA: Postoperative nausea and vomiting in regional anaesthesia. Anaesthesiology 2003; 98:530-547.
24. Van den Bosch JE, Moons KG, Bonsel GJ, Kalkman CJ: Does measurement of preoperative anxiety have added value for predicting postoperative nausea and vomiting? Anaesth Analg 2005;100:1525-1532.
25. Hasen KV, Samartzis D, Casas LA, Mustoe TA: An outcome study comparing intravenous sedation with midazolam/fentanyl (conscious sedation) versus propofol infusion (deep sedation) for aesthetic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003;112:1683-1689.
26. Villeret I, Laffon M, Ferrandiere M, Delerue D, Fusciardi J: Which propofol target concentration for ASA III elderly patients for conscious sedation combined with regional anaesthesia? Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 2003; 22:196-201.