Biomechanical evaluation of proximal tibia behaviour with the use of femoral stems in revision TKA: An in vitro and finite element analysis

Clinical Biomechanics

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 159-165

  Completo, A ^a   Rego, A ^a   Fonseca, F ^b   Ramos, A ^a   Relvas, C ^a   Simoes J A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AVEIRO   (Portugal)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COIMBRA   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Cemented stem; Experimental strains; Femur; Press fit stem; Revision total knee arthroplasty; Tibia

Indexed keywords

AXIAL STRAIN; BIOMECHANICAL EVALUATION; BONE STRUCTURE; CANCELLOUS BONE; EXPERIMENTAL STRAINS; FAILURE MECHANISM; FEMORAL STEMS; FINITE ELEMENT; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; FINITE ELEMENT MODELS; GOOD CORRELATIONS; IN-VITRO; PHYSIOLOGICAL LOADS; RISK OF FAILURE; STRAIN MAGNITUDE; STRUCTURAL ASPECTS; STRUCTURAL BEHAVIOUR; TIBIAL TRAY; TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY;

BIOMECHANICS; BONE; GAGES; MAMMALS; PHYSIOLOGICAL MODELS; PRESSES (MACHINE TOOLS); STRAIN; SURGERY;

FINITE ELEMENT METHOD;

ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BONE STRESS; CANCELLOUS BONE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMUR; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; IN VITRO STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROXIMAL TIBIA; TIBIA; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; ELASTIC MODULUS; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; FEMUR; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TIBIA;

EID: 73749083532     PISSN: 02680033     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2009.10.011     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Abdi H. Bonferroni and Šidák corrections for multiple comparisons. In: Salkind N.J. (Ed). Encyclopedia of Measurement and Statistics (2007), Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
2. Albrektsson B.E., Ryd L., Carlsson L.V., Freeman M.A., Herberts P., Regnér L., and Selvik G. The effect of a stem on the tibial component of knee arthroplasty. A roentgen stereophotogrammetric study of uncemented tibial components in the Freeman-Samuelson knee arthroplasty. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 72 2 (1990) 252-258
3. Bono J.V., and Scott R.D. Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty (2005), Springer-Verlag, New York
4. Burstein A.H., and Wright T.M. Fundamentals of Orthopaedic Biomechanics (1994), Williams & Wilkins
5. Cheung G., Zalzal P., Bhandari M., Spelt J.K., and Papini M. Finite element analysis of a femoral retrograde intramedullary nail subject to gait loading. Med. Eng. Phys. 26 (2004) 93-108
6. Clatworthy M.G., Balance J., Brick G.W., Chandler H.P., and Gross A.E. The use of structural allograft for uncontained defects in revision total knee arthroplasty a minimum five-year review. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 83A (2001) 404-411
7. Completo A., Fonseca F., and Simões J. Finite element and experimental cortex strains of the intact and implanted tibia. J. Biomech. Eng. 129 (2007) 791-797
8. Gofton W.T., Tsigaras H., Butler R.A., Patterson J.J., Barrack R.L., and Rorabeck C.H. Revision total knee arthroplasty - fixation with modular stems. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 404 (2002) 158-168
9. Hashemi A., and Shirazi A.D.L. Finite element analysis of tibial implants-effect of fixation design and friction model. Cumput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng. 3 (2000) 183-201
10. Heiner A.D. Structural properties of fourth-generation composite femurs and tibias. J. Biomech. 41 (2008) 3282-3284
11. Heinlein B., Kutzner I., Graichen F., Bender A., Rohlmann A., Halder A.M., Beier A., and Bergmann G. ESB clinical biomechanics award 2008. Complete data of total knee replacement loading for level walking and stair climbing measured in vivo with a follow-up of 6-10 months. Clin. Biomech. 24 4 (2009) 315-326
12. Hoeffel D.P., and Rubash H.E. Revision total knee arthroplasty: current rationale and techniques for femoral component revision. Clin. Orthop. 380 (2000) 116-132
13. Howling G.I., Barnett P.I., Tipper J.L., Stone M.H., Fisher J., and Ingham E. Quantitative characterization of polyethylene debris isolated from periprosthetic tissue in early failure knee implants and early and late failure Charnley hip implants. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 58 (2001) 415-420
14. .
15. Jazrawi L.M., Bai B., Kummer F.J., Hiebert R., and Stuchin S.A. The effect of stem modularity and mode of fixation on tibial component stability in revision total knee arthroplasty. J. Arthroplasty 16 (2001) 759-767
16. Li M.G., and Nilsson K.G. Changes in bone mineral density at the proximal tibia after total knee arthroplasty. J. Orthop. Res. 18 (2000) 40-47
17. Mabry T.M., and Hanssen A.D. The role of stems and augments for bone loss in revision knee arthroplasty. J. Arthroplasty 22 4 (2007) 56-60
18. Mann K.A., Bartel D.L., Wright T.M., and Ingraffe A.R. Mechanical characteristics of the stem-cement interface. J. Orthop. Res. 9 (1991) 798-808
19. Matthews L.S., Sonstegard D.A., and Henke J.A. Load bearing characteristics of the patello-femoral joint. Acta Orthop. Scand. 48 5 (1977) 511-516
20. Morrison J.B. The mechanics of the knee joint in relation to normal walking. J. Biomech. 3 1 (1970) 51-61
21. Murray M.P., Drought A.B., and Kory R.C. Walking patterns of normal men. J. Bone Joint Surg. 46A (1964) 335-359
22. Nazarian D.G., Mehta S., and Booth R.E. A comparison of stemmed and unstemmed components in revision knee arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 404 (2002) 256-262
23. Peters P.C., Engh G.A., Dwyer K.A., and Vinh T.N. Osteolysis after total knee arthroplasty without cement. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 74 (1992) 864-876
24. Peters C.L., Erickson J., Kloepper R.G., and Mohr R.A. Revision total knee arthroplasty with modular components inserted with metaphyseal cement and stems without cement. J. Arthroplasty 20 3 (2005) 302-308
25. Rand J.A., Peterson L.F., Bryan R.S., and Ilstrup D.M. Revision total knee arthroplasty. Instr. Course Lect. 35 (1986) 305-318
26. Rawlinson J.J., Peters L.E., Campbell D.A., Windsor R., Wright T., and Bartel D. Cancellous bone strains indicate efficacy of stem augmentation in constrained condylar knees. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 400 (2005) 107-116
27. Sharkey P.F., Hozack W.J., Rothman R.H., Shastri S., and Jacoby S.M. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today?. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 404 (2002) 7-13
28. Sierra, R.J., Pagnano, M.W., Trousdale, R.T., 2003. Reoperations after 3200 revision total knee replacements: rate, etiology, and lessons learned. In: Proceedings of the 70th Annual Meeting of the AAOS. New Orleans, February, p. 40.
29. Soininvaara T.A., Miettinen H.J.A., Jurvelin J.S., Suomalainen O.T., Alhava E.M., and Kröger H.P.J. Periprosthetic tibial bone mineral density changes after total knee arthroplasty one-year follow-up study of 69 patients. Acta Orthop. Scand. 75 (2004) 600-605
30. Taylor M., and Tanner K.E. Fatigue failure of cancellous bone: a possible cause of implant migration and loosening. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 79 2 (1997) 181-182
31. van Loon C.J.M., Kyyriazopoulos A., Verdonschot N., Willems G.H., de Waal Malefijt M.C., Huiskes R., and Buma P. The role of femoral stem extension in total knee arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 378 (2000) 282-289
32. Viceconti M., Muccini R., Bernakiewicz M., Baleani M., and Cristofolini L. Large-sliding contact elements accurately predict levels of bone-implant micromotion relevant to osseointegration. J. Biomech. 33 (2000) 1611-1618
33. Whaley A.L., Trousdale R.T., Rand J.A., and Hassen A.D. Cemented long-stem revision total knee arthoroplasty. J. Arthroplasty 18 (2003) 592-599
34. Whiteside L.A., and Bicalho P.S. Radiologic and histologic analysis of morselized allograft in revision total knee replacement. Clin. Orthop. 357 (1998) 149-156