Interactions during in vitro germination of Scots pine pollen

Trees - Structure and Function

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 99-104

  Varis, Saila ^a   Reininharju, Jukka ^b   Santanen, Arja ^c   Ranta, Hanna ^b   Pulkkinen, Pertti ^a  

^a FINNISH FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

Non random mating; Pinus sylvestris; Pollen competition; Pollen interactions

Indexed keywords

CONTROL EXPERIMENTS; FINLAND; GERMINABILITY; IN-CONTROL; IN-VITRO; MEDIATED INTERACTION; PINUS SYLVESTRIS; POLLEN DONORS; RANDOM MATING; SCOTS PINE; SOUTHERN FINLAND;

COMPETITION;

EXPERIMENTS;

PINUS SYLVESTRIS;

EID: 73649146544     PISSN: 09311890     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00468-009-0382-4     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Apsit VJ, Nakamura RR, Wheeler NC (1989) Differential male reproductive success in Douglas fir. Theor Appl Genet 77: 681-684. doi: 10. 1007/BF00261244.
2. Aronen T, Nikkanen T, Harju A, Tiimonen H, Häggman H (2002) Pollen competition and seed-siring success in Picea abies. Theor Appl Genet 104: 638-642. doi: 10. 1007/s00122-001-0789-9.
3. Bertin RI, Sullivan M (1988) Pollen interference and cryptic self-fertility in Campsis radicans. Am J Bot 75: 1140-1147.
4. Brewbaker JL, Kwack BH (1963) The essential role of calcium ion in pollen germination and pollen tube growth. Am J Bot 50: 859-865. doi: 10. 2307/2439772.
5. Brewbaker JL, Majumder SK (1961) Cultural studies of the pollen population effect and the self-incompatibility inhibition. Am J Bot 48: 457-464.
6. Brink RA (1924) The physiology of pollen IV. Chemotropism; effects on growth of grouping grains; formation and function of callose plugs; summary and conclusions. Am J Bot 11: 417-436.
7. Charnov EL (1979) Simultaneous hermaphroditism and sexual selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 76: 2480-2484.
8. Cheliak WM, Skrøppa T, Pitel JA (1987) Genetics of the polycross. 1. Experimental results from Norway spruce. Theor Appl Genet 73: 321-329. doi: 10. 1007/BF00262496.
9. Chen Y-F, Matsubayashi Y, Sakagami Y (2000) Peptide growth factor phytosulfokine-α contributes to the pollen population effect. Planta 211: 752-755. doi: 10. 1007/s004250000370.
10. Cruzan MB (1986) Pollen tube distributions in Nicotiana glauca: evidence for density dependent growth. Am J Bot 73: 902-907.
11. Cruzan MB (1990) Pollen-pollen and pollen-style interactions during pollen tube growth in Erythronium grandiflorum (Liliaceae). Am J Bot 77: 116-122.
12. d'Eeckenbrugge GC (1990) The progamic phase in Cichorium intybus L. Pollen tube growth in the style, incompatibility reaction and gametophytic competition. Euphytica 48: 17-23. doi: 10. 1007/BF00028957.
13. Dawkins MD, Owens JN (1993) In vitro and in vivo pollen hydration, germination, and pollen-tube growth in Picea glauca (Moench) Voss. Int J Plant Sci 154: 506-521.
14. Doyle J, O'Leary M (1935) Pollination in Pinus. Sci Proc R Dublin Soc 21: 180-190.
15. El-Kassaby YA, Ritland K (1992) Frequency-dependent male reproductive success in a polycross of Douglas fir. Theor Appl Genet 83: 752-758. doi: 10. 1007/BF00226694.
16. Fernando DD, Lazzarro MD, Ownes JN (2005) Growth and development of conifer pollen tubes. Sex Plant Reprod 18: 149-162. doi: 10. 1007/s00497-005-0008-y.
17. Fiebig A, Kimport R, Preuss D (2004) Comparisons of pollen coat genes across Brassicaceae species reveal rapid evolution by repeat expansion and diversification. PNAS 101: 3286-3291. doi: 10. 1073/pnas. 0305448101.
18. Gelbrart G, von Aderkas P (2002) Ovular secretions as part of pollination mechanisms in conifers. Ann For Sci 59: 345-357.
19. Krauss SL (2000) The realized effect of postpollination sexual selection in a natural plant population. Proc R Soc Lond B 257: 1925-1929. doi: 10. 1098/rspb. 2000. 1231.
20. Lankinen Å, Skogsmyr I (2002) Pollen competitive ability: the effect of proportion in two-donor crosses. Evol Ecol Res 4: 687-700.
21. Liepelt S, Bialozyt R, Ziegenhagen B (2002) Wind-dispersed pollen mediates postglacial gene flow among refugia. PNAS 99: 14590-14594. doi: 10. 1073/pnas. 212285399.
22. Lindgren D, Paule L, Xihuan S, Yazdani R, Segerström U, Wallin J-E, Lejdebro ML (1995) Can viable pollen carry Scots pine genes over long distances? Grana 34: 64-69.
23. Marshall DL, Diggle PK (2001) Mechanisms of differential pollen donor performance in wild radish Raphnus sativus (Brassicaceae). Am J Bot 88: 242-257.
24. Marshall DL, Ellstrand NC (1986) Sexual selection in Raphanus sativus: experimental data on nonrandom fertilization, maternal choice, and consequences of multiple paternity. Am Nat 127: 446-461. doi: 10. 1086/284494.
25. Marshall DL, Folsom MW, Hatfield C, Bennet T (1996) Does interference competition among pollen grains occur in wild radish? Evolution 50: 1842-1848. doi: 10. 2307/2410741.
26. Mitchell RJ, Marshall DL (1998) Nonrandom mating and sexual selection in a desert mustard: an experimental approach. Am J Bot 85: 48-55.
27. Moran GF, Griffin AR (1985) Non-random contribution of pollen in polycrosses of Pinus radiata D. Don. Silv Gen 34: 117-121.
28. Nakamura RR, Wheeler NC (1992) Pollen competition and paternal success in Douglas fir. Evolution 46: 846-851.
29. Niesenbaum RA (1999) The effects of pollen load size and donor diversity on pollen performance, selective abortion, and progeny vigor in Mirabilis jalapa (Nyctaginaceae). Am J Bot 86: 261-268.
30. Owens JN, Takaso T, Runions CJ (1998) Pollination in conifers. Trends Plant Sci 3: 479-485. doi: 10. 1016/S1360-1385(98)01337-5.
31. Parantainen A, Pasonen HL (2004) Pollen-pollen interactions in Pinus sylvestris. Scand J For Res 19: 199-205. doi: 10. 1080/02827580410029336.
32. Pasonen HL, Käpylä M (1998) Pollen-pollen interactions in Betula pendula in vitro. New Phytol 138: 481-487. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1469-8137. 1998. 00135. x.
33. Pasonen HL, Pulkkinen P, Käpylä M, Blom A (1999) Pollen-tube growth rate and seed-siring success among Betula pendula clones. New Phytol 143: 243-251. doi: 10. 1046/j. 1469-8137. 1999. 00451. x.
34. Pettitt JM (1985) Pollen tube development and characteristics of the protein emission in conifers. Ann Bot 56: 379-397.
35. Pulkkinen P, Varis S, Pakkanen A, Koivuranta L, Vakkari P, Parantainen A (2009) Southern pollen sired more seeds than northern pollen in southern seed orchards established with northern clones of Pinus sylvestris. Scand J For Res 24: 8-14. doi: 10. 1080/02827580802592467.
36. Sarvas R (1962) Investigations on the flowering and seed crop of Pinus sylvestris. Commun Inst For Fenn 53: 1-198.
37. Schemske DW, Fenster C (1983) Pollen-grain interactions in a neotropical Costus: effects of clump size and competitors. In: Mulcahy DL, Ottaviano E (eds) Pollen: biology and implications for plant breeding. Elsevier, NY, pp 405-410.
38. Schoen DJ, Cheliak WM (1987) Genetics in the polycross 2. Male fertility variation in Norway spruce, Picea abies (L.) Karst. Theor Appl Genet 74: 554-559. doi: 10. 1007/BF00288851.
39. Skogsmyr I, Lankinen Å (1999) Selection on pollen competitive ability in relation to stochastic factors influencing pollen deposition. Evol Ecol Res 1: 971-985.
40. Skogsmyr I, Lankinen Å (2000) Potential selection for female choice in Viola tricolor. Evol Ecol Res 2: 965-979.
41. Skogsmyr I, Lankinen Å (2002) Sexual selection: an evolutionary force in plants? Biol Rev 77: 537-562. doi: 10. 1017/S1464793102005973.
42. Skrøppa T, Lindgren D (1994) Male fertility variation and non-random segregation in pollen-mix crosses of Picea abies. For Genet 1: 13-22.
43. Smouse PE, Meagher TR (1994) Genetic analysis of male reproductive contributions in Chamaelirium luteum (L.) gray (Liliaceae). Genetics 136: 313-322.
44. Snow AA, Spira TP (1991) Differential pollen-tube growth rates and nonrandom fertilization in Hibiscus moscheutos (Malvaceae). Am J Bot 78: 1419-1426. doi: 10. 2307/2445280.
45. Steiner W, Gregorius HR (1999) Incompatibility and pollen competition in Alnus glutinosa: evidence from pollination experiments. Genetica 105: 259-271. doi: 10. 1023/A: 1003859030320.
46. Stephenson A, Bertin R (1983) Male competition, female choice, and sexual selection in plants. In: Real L (ed) Pollination biology. Academic Press, Orlando, pp 109-149.
47. Taylor LP, Hepler PK (1997) Pollen germination and tube growth. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 48: 461-491. doi: 10. 1146/annurev. arplant. 48. 1. 461.
48. Thomson JD (1989) Germination schedules of pollen grains: implications for pollen selection. Evolution 43: 220-223.
49. Tilman D (1988) Plant strategies and the dynamics and structure of plant communities. Monog Pop Biol 26: 1-360 Princeton U. P.
50. Varis S, Santanen A, Pakkanen A, Pulkkinen P (2008) The importance of being the first pollen in the strobili of Scots pine. Can J For Res 38: 2976-2980. doi: 10. 1139/X08-138.
51. Visser T, Marcucci CM (1983) Pollen and pollination experiments IX. The pioneer pollen effect in apple and pear related to the interval between pollination and temperature. Euphytica 32: 703-709. doi: 10. 1007/BF00042150.
52. Walsh NE, Charlesworth D (1992) Evolutionary interpretations of differences in pollen tube growth rates. Q Rev Biol 67: 19-37. doi: 10. 1086/417446.
53. Wiselogel AE, van Buijtenen JP (1988) Probability of equal mating in polymix pollinations of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.). Silvae Genet 37: 184-187.
54. Zinkl GM, Preuss D (2000) Dissecting Arabidopsis pollen-stigma interactions reveals novel mechanisms that confer mating specifity. Ann Bot 85: 15-21. doi: 10. 1006/anbo. 1999. 1066.