Evaluation of the adhesion to the EULAR and OARSI recommendations for the treatment of knee and hip osteoarthritis in current practice;Evaluation de l'adhésion aux recommandations de l'EULAR et de l'OARSI pour le traitement de l'arthrose du genou et de lahanche en pratique quotidienne

Praxis

Volumn 98, Issue 24, 2009, Pages 1429-1435

  Van Linthoudt, Daniel ^a  

^a Hopital de la Chaux de Fonds   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Hip; Knee; Osteoarthritis; Recommendations; Treatment

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; HUMAN; INTERNIST; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; MEDICAL SOCIETY; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; MUSCULOSKELETAL DISEASE; ORTHOPEDIC SURGEON; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PROFESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUESTIONNAIRE; RHEUMATOLOGY; SURGEON;

EID: 73649123555     PISSN: 16618157     EISSN: 16618165     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1024/1661-8157.98.24.1429     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Peat G, McCarney R, Croft P. Knee pain and osteoarthritis in older adults: a review of community burden and current use of primary health care. Ann Rheum Dis 2001; 60: 91-7. (Pubitemid 32102197)
2. Zhang W, Doherty M, Arden N et al. EULAR evidence based recommendations for the management of hip osteoarthritis: report of a task force of the EULAR standing committee for international clinical studies including therapeutics (ESCISIT). Ann Rheum Dis 2005; 64: 669-81. (Pubitemid 40559291)
3. Guccione AA, Felson DT, Anderson JJ et al. The effects of specific medical conditions on the functional limitations of elders in the Framingham study. Am J Publ Health 1994; 84: 351-8. (Pubitemid 24107816)
4. Zhang W, Moskowitz RW, Nukki G et al. OARSI recommendations for the management of hip and knee osteoarthritis, Part I: critical appraisal of existing treatment guidelines and systematic review of current research evidence. Osteoarthritis Cart 2007; 15: 981-1000. (Pubitemid 47393443)
5. American College of Rheumatology subcommittee on osteoarthritis guidelines. Recommendations for the medical management of osteoarthritis of the hip and knee: 2000 update. Arthritis Rheum 2000; 43: 1905-15.
6. Jordan KM, Arden NK, Doherty M et al. EULAR recommendations 2003: an evidence based approach to the management of knee osteoarthritis: report of a task force of the standing committee for international clinical studies including therapeutic trials (ESCISIT). Ann Rheum Dis 2003; 62: 1145-55. (Pubitemid 37500619)
7. Zhang W, Moskowitz RW, Nuki G et al. OARSI recommendations for the management of hip and knee osteoarthritis, Part II: OARSI evidence-based, expert consensus guidelines. Osteoarthritis Cart 2008; 16: 137-62. (Pubitemid 351222155)
8. Mazières B, Schmidely N, Hauselmann HJ et al. Level of acceptability of EULAR recommendations for the management of knee osteoarthritis by practitioners in different European countries. Ann Rheum Dis 2005; 64: 1158-64. (Pubitemid 41113350)
9. Mahieu E, Leutenegger E. Connaissance et adhésion des rhumatologues Français aux recommandations de l'EULAR pour la prise en charge de la gonarthrose : résultats de l'enquête DRAGON. Rev Rhum 2007; 74: 980-1.
10. Conrozier T, Marre JP, Payen-Champenois C, Vignon E. National survey on the non-pharmacological modalities prescribed by French general practitioners in the treatment of lower limb (knee and hip) osteoarthritis. Adherence to the EULAR recommendations and factors influencing adherence. Clin Exp Rheum 2008; 26: 793-8.
11. Gossec L, Dougados M, Philips C et al. Dissemination and evaluation of the ASAS/EULAR recommendations for the management of ankylosing spondylitis: results of a study among 1507 rheumatologists. Ann Rheum Dis 2008; 67: 782-8. (Pubitemid 351829378)
12. American association of orthopaedic surgeons. Treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee (non arthroplasty). Full guidelines; December 6, 2008. aaos.org/research/guidelines/OAK guideline.pdf, p 278.