Treatment effects of twin-block and mandibular protraction appliance-IV in the correction of class II malocclusion

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 80, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 485-491

  Jena, Ashok Kumar ^a   Duggal, Ritu ^b  

^a POSTGRADUATE INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL EDUCATION AND RESEARCH   (India)

^b ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (India)

Author keywords

Class II malocclusion; MPA; Treatment effects; Twin block

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HUMAN; INCISOR; INSTRUMENTATION; MALOCCLUSION; MANDIBLE; MANDIBLE RECONSTRUCTION; MAXILLA; MOLAR TOOTH; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; ORTHODONTICS; PATHOLOGY; PERIODONTAL DISEASE; RETROGNATHIA; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADOLESCENT; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INCISOR; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS II; MANDIBLE; MANDIBULAR ADVANCEMENT; MAXILLA; MOLAR; ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCE DESIGN; ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCES, FUNCTIONAL; RETROGNATHISM; TOOTH MOVEMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 73649117785     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: 00033219     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2319/062709-359.1     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Firouz M, Zernik J, Nanda R. Dental and orthopedic effects of high-pull headgear in treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1992;102:197-205.
2. Jasper JJ. The Jasper Jumper-A Fixed Functional Appliance. Sheboygan, WI: American Orthodontics; 1987.
3. Coelho Filho CM. Mandibular protraction appliances for Class II treatment. J Clin Orthod. 1995;29:319-336.
4. Coelho Filho CM. Clinical applications of the mandibular protraction appliance. J Clin Orthod. 1997;31:92-102.
5. Coelho Filho CM. The mandibular protraction appliance no. 3. J Clin Orthod. 1998;32:379-384.
6. Coelho Filho CM. Mandibular protraction appliance IV. J Clin Orthod. 2001;35:18-24.
7. Pangrazio-Kulbersh V, Berger J, Chermak DS, Kaczynski R, Simon ES, Haerian A. Treatment effects of the mandibular anterior repositioning appliance on patients with Class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;123: 286-295.
8. Siqueira DF, de Almeira RR, Janson G, Brandão AG, Coelho Filho CM. Dentoskeletal and soft-tissue changes with cervical headgear and mandibular protraction appliance therapy in the treatment of Class II malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;131:447.e21-447.e30.
9. Johnston LE Jr. Balancing the books on orthodontic treatment: an integrated analysis of change. Br J Orthod. 1996;23:93-102.
10. Toth LR, McNamara JA Jr. Treatment effects produced by the twin-block appliance and the FR-2 appliance of Fränkel compared with an untreated Class II sample. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999;116:597-609.
11. Mills CM, McCulloch KJ. Posttreatment changes after successful correction of Class II malocclusions with twin-block appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000;118:24-33.
12. Trenouth MJ. Proportional changes in cephalometric distance during twin-block appliance therapy. Eur J Orthod. 2002;24:485-491.
13. O'Brien K, Wright J, Conboy F, Sanjil Y, Mandall N, Chadwick S, et al. Effectiveness of early orthodontic treatment with twin-block appliance: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Part-1: dental and skeletal effects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;124:234-243. (Pubitemid 37102772)
14. Jena AK, Duggal R, Parkash H. Skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of twin-block and bionator appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion: a comparative study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;130:594-602.
15. Vanlaecken R, Martin CA, Dischinger T, Razmus T, Ngan P. Treatment effects of the edgewise-Herbst appliance: a cephalometric and tomographic investigation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;130:582-593.
16. Clark WJ. The twin-block technique. Am J Orthod. 1988;93: 1-18.
17. Illing HM, Morris DO, Lee RT. A prospective evaluation of Bass, bionator and twin-block appliances. Part I: the hard tissues. Eur J Orthod. 1998;20:501-516.
18. Valant JR, Sinclair PM. Treatment effects of the Herbst appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989;95: 138-147.
19. Lee RT, Kyi CS, Mack GJ. A controlled clinical trial of the effects of twin-block and Dynamax appliances on the hard and soft tissues. Eur J Orthod. 2007;29:272-282.
20. Sidlauskas A. The effects of the twin-block appliance treatment on the skeletal and dento-alveolar changes in Class II division 1 malocclusion. Medicina (Kaunas). 2005; 41:392-400.
21. Pancherz H. The mechanism of Class II correction in Herbst appliance treatment: a cephalometric investigation. Am J Orthod. 1982;82:104-113.
22. Gill DS, Lee RT. Prospective clinical trial comparing the effects of conventional twin-block and mini-block appliances: part-1. Hard tissue changes. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005;127:465-472.
23. de Oliveira JN Jr, de Almeida RR, de Almeida MR, de Oliveira JN. Dentoskeletal changes induced by Jasper jumper and cervical headgear appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;132:54-62.
24. Cope JB, Buschang PH, Cope DD, Parker J. Quantitative evaluation of craniofacial changes with Jasper jumper therapy. Angle Orthod. 1994;64:113-122.
25. Wieslander L. Intensive treatment of Class II malocclusions with headgear Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition. Am J Orthod. 1984;86:1-13.
26. Tumer N, Gultan AS. Comparison of the effects of monobloc and twin-block appliances on the skeletal and dentoalveolar structures. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999;116: 460-468.
27. Lund DI, Sandler PJ. The effects of twin-blocks: a prospective controlled study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998; 113:104-110.
28. Gafari J, Shofer FS, Jacobsson-Hunt U, Markowitz DL, Laster LL. Headgear versus functional regulator in the early treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;113: 51-61.
29. Gonner U, Ozkan V, Jahn E, Toll DE. Effect of MARA on the position of the lower anteriors in children, adolescents and adults with Class II malocclusion. J Orofac Orthop. 2007;68: 397-412.
30. O'Brien K, Wright J, Conboy F, Sanjil Y, Mandall N, Chadwick S, et al. Effectiveness of treatment for Class II malocclusion with Herbst or twin-block appliances: a randomized, controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;124:128-137. (Pubitemid 36952493)