Public trust in government concerning tobacco control in Japan

Risk Analysis

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 143-152

  Nakayachi, Kazuya ^a   Cvetkovich, George ^b  

^a DOSHISHA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b WESTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Competence; Fairness; Tobacco control; Trust; Value similarity

Indexed keywords

GOVERNMENT POLICY; MULTIPLE REGRESSION ANALYSIS; PUBLIC TRUST; QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEYS; TOBACCO CONTROL; TRUST VALUES; WEAK LINKS;

REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SURVEYS; TAXATION;

TOBACCO;

HEALTH POLICY; IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS; MULTIPLE REGRESSION; PUBLIC HEALTH; QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY; SMOKING; STATE ROLE; TAX SYSTEM; TOBACCO;

ADULT; AGED; COMMUNICATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; JAPAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PUBLIC OPINION; PUBLIC POLICY; QUESTIONNAIRES; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RISK MANAGEMENT; SMOKING; TAXES; TOBACCO; YOUNG ADULT;

JAPAN;

NICOTIANA TABACUM;

EID: 73649102797     PISSN: 02724332     EISSN: 15396924     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01306.x     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. The World Health Organization. 10 facts on the tobacco epidemic and its control. Available at : http://www.who.int/features/factfiles/tobacco-epidemic/ en/index.html, Accessed on February 7, 2008.
2. Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. National survey on health and nutrition in 2006. Available at : http://www.mhlw.go.jp/houdou/2008/ 04/h0430-2a.html, Accessed on April 30, 2008.
3. Peto R, Lopez A, Boreham J, Thun M, Heath C Jr. Mortality from smoking in developed countries 1950-2000. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1994. Updated estimation is available at : http://www.deathsfromsmoking.net, Accessed on October 14, 2008.
4. Slovic P. (ed). Smoking: Risk, Perception & Policy. Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage Publications, 2001.
5. Japan Tobacco Inc. A public commentary declaring our opposition to any drastic increases in tobacco tax. Available at : http://www.jti.co.jp/JTI/ attention/about-comment.html, Accessed on June 11, 2008.
6. Cvetkovich G, Lofstedt RE (eds). Social Trust and the Management of Risk. London : Earthscan, 1999.
7. Poortinga W, Pidgeon NF. Prior attitudes, salient value similarity, and dimensionality: Toward an integrative model of trust in risk regulation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2006 36 : 1674 1700.
8. Siegrist M. The influence of trust and perceptions of risk and benefits on the acceptance of gene technology. Risk Analysis, 2000 20 : 195 203.
9. Slovic P. Perceived risk, trust, and democracy. Risk Analysis, 1993 13 : 675 682.
10. Slovic P. Trust, emotion, sex, politics and science: Surveying the risk-assessment battlefield. Risk Analysis, 1999 19 : 689 701.
11. Hovland CI, Janis IL, Kelley HH. Communication and Persuasion. New Haven, CT : Yale University Press, 1953.
12. Luhmann N. Trust and Power: Two Works by Niklas Luhmann. Chichester, UK : John Wiley & Sons, 1979.
13. Barber B. The Logic and Limit of Trust. New Brunswick, NJ : Rutgers University Press, 1983.
14. Cummings LL, Bromiley P. The organizational trust inventory (OTI): Development and validation. Pp. 68 89 in Krammer RM, Tyler TR (eds). Trust in Organizations. Newbury Park, CA : Sage Publications, 1996.
15. Kasperson RE, Golding D, Tuler S. Social distrust as a factor in siting hazardous facilities and communicating risk. Journal of Social Issues, 1992 48 : 161 187.
16. Renn O, Levine D. Credibility and trust in risk communication. Pp. 175 218 in Kasperson RE, Stallen PJM (eds). Communicating Risks to the Public. Dordrecht : Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1991.
17. Renn O, Webler T, Kastenholz H. Perception of uncertainty: Lessons for risk management and communication. Pp. 163 181 in Sublet VH, Covello VT, Tinker TL (eds). Scientific Uncertainty and its Influence on the Public Communication Process. Boston : Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1996.
18. Covello VT. Trust and credibility in risk communication. Health and Environment Digest, 1992 6 : 1 3.
19. Peters RG, Covello VT, McCallum DB. The determinants of trust and credibility in environmental risk communication: An empirical study. Risk Analysis, 1997 17 : 43 54.
20. Jungermann H, Pfister H, Fischer K. Credibility, information preferences, and information interests. Risk Analysis, 1996 16 : 251 261.
21. Johnson B. Exploring dimensionality in the origins of hazard related trust. Journal of Risk Research, 1999 2 : 325 354.
22. Earle TC, Cvetkovich G. Social Trust: Toward a Cosmopolitan Society. Westport, CT : Praeger Press, 1995.
23. Bardi A, Schwartz SH. Values and behavior: Strength and structure of relations. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 2003 29 : 1207 1220.
24. Corraliza JA, Berenguer J. Environmental values, beliefs, and actions: A situational approach. Environment & Behavior, 2000 32 : 832 848.
25. Verplanken B, Holland RW. Motivated decision making: Effects of activation and selfcentrality of values on choices and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2002 82 : 434 447.
26. Cvetkovich G, Winter PL. The what, how, and when of social reliance and cooperative risk management. Pp. 187 209 in Siegrist M, Earle TC, Gutscher H (eds). Trust in Cooperative Risk Management: Uncertainty and Skepticism in the Public. London : Earthscan, 2007.
27. Earle TC, Cvetkovich G. Culture, cosmopolitanism, and risk management. Risk Analysis, 1997 17 : 55 65.
28. Siegrist M, Cvetkovich GT. Perception of hazards: The role of social trust and knowledge. Risk Analysis, 2000 20 : 713 720.
29. Siegrist M, Cvetkovich GT, Gutscher H. Shared values, social trust, and the perception of geographic cancer clusters. Risk Analysis, 2001 21 : 1047 1053.
30. Siegrist M, Earle TC, Gutscher H. Test of a trust and confidence model in the applied context of electromagnetic field (EMF) risks. Risk Analysis, 2003 23 : 705 716.
31. Siegrist M, Gutscher H, Earle TC. Perception of risk: The influence of general trust, and general confidence. Journal of Risk Research, 2005 8 : 145 156.
32. Metley D. Institutional trust and confidence: A journey into a conceptual quagmire. Pp. 100 116 in Cvetkovich G, Lofstedt RE (eds). Social Trust and the Management of Risk. London : Earthscan Publications, 1999.
33. Poortinga W, Pidgeon NF. Exploring the dimensionality of trust in risk regulation. Risk Analysis, 2003 23 : 961 972.
34. Allum N. An empirical test of competing theories of hazard-related trust: The case of GM food. Risk Analysis, 2007 27 : 935 946.
35. Earle TC. Thinking aloud about trust: A protocol analysis of trust in risk management. Risk Analysis, 2004 24 : 169 183.
36. The Food Safety Commission of Japan. Role of the Food Safety Commission. Available at : http://www.fsc.go.jp/english/aboutus/ roleofthefoodsaftycommission.html, Accessed on October 14, 2008.
37. Cvetkovich G, Nakayachi K. Trust in a high-concern risk controversy: A comparison of three concepts. Journal of Risk Research, 2007 10 : 223 237.
38. Skitka LJ. Of different minds: An accessible identity model of justice reasoning. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2003 7 : 286 297.
39. Skitka LJ, Houston DA. When due process is of no consequence: Moral mandates and presumed defendant guilt or innocence. Social Justice Research, 2001 14 : 305 326.
40. Skitka LJ, Mullen E. Understanding judgments of fairness in a real-world political context: A test of the value protection model of justice reasoning. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2002 28 : 588 597.
41. Earle TC, Siegrist M. On the relation between fairness and trust in environmental risk management. Risk Analysis, 2008 21 : 1395 1413.
42. Petty RE, Cacioppo JT. Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change. New York : Springer-Verlag, 1986.
43. Chaiken S. Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1980 39 : 752 766.