Trust in a High-concern Risk Controversy: A Comparison of Three Concepts

Journal of Risk Research

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 223-237

  Cvetkovich, George ^a   Nakayachi, Kazuya ^b  

^a WESTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b TEZUKAYAMA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Encapsulated trust; Trust; Trust dimensions; Value similarity

Indexed keywords

CORRELATION METHODS; MOTOR BOATS; SOCIAL ASPECTS; WATER SUPPLY;

ENCAPSULATED TRUST; TRUST DIMENSIONS; VALUE SIMILARITY;

RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 33947398916     PISSN: 13669877     EISSN: 14664461     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13669870601122519     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Allum, N. (2002) An empirical test of competing theories of hazard-related trust: The case of GM food. Paper presented at the Society for Risk Analysis, New Orleans, 8-11 December. Available at http://staff.soc.surrey. ac.uk/nallum/index.htm.
2. Barber, B. (1983) The logic and limit of trust (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press).
3. Bardi, A. and Schwartz, S. H. (2003) Values and behavior: Strength and structure of relations, Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(10), pp. 1207-1220.
4. Cook, G. I., Marsh, R. L. and Hicks, J. L. (2003) Halo and devil effects demonstrate valenced-based influences on source-monitoring decisions, Consciousness and Cognition: An International Journal, 12(2), pp. 257-278.
5. Corraliza, J. A. and Berenguer, J. (2000) Environmental values, beliefs, and actions: A situational approach, Environment & Behavior, 32(6), pp. 832-848.
6. Covello, V. T. (1992) Trust and credibility in risk communication, Health and Environment Digest, 6, pp. 1-3.
7. Cummings, L. L. and Bromiley, P. (1996) The Organizational Trust Inventory (OTI): Development and validation, in: R. M. Krammer & T. R. Tyler (Eds) Trust in organizations, pp. 68-89 (Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications).
8. Cvetkovich, G. T. and Löfstedt, R. E. (Eds) (1999) Social trust and the management of risk (London: Earthscan).
9. Cvetkovich, G. T., Siegrist, M., Murray, R. and Tragesser, S. (2002) New information and social trust: Asymmetry and perseverance of attributions about hazard managers, Risk Analysis, 22(2), pp. 359-367.
10. Cvetkovich, G. T. and Winter, P. L. (in press) The what, how, and when of social reliance and cooperative risk management, in: M. Siegrist, H. Gutscher & T. C. Earle (Eds) Trust, technology, and society: Studies in cooperative risk management (London: Earthscan).
11. Delgado, M. R., Frank, R. H. and Phelps, E. A. (2005) Perceptions of moral character modulate the neural systems of reward during the trust game, Nature Neuroscience, 8(11), pp. 1611-1618.
12. Earle, T. C. (2004) Thinking aloud about trust: A protocol analysis of trust in risk management, Risk Analysis, 24(1), pp. 169-183.
13. Earle, T. C. and Cvetkovich, G. T. (1997) Culture, cosmopolitanism, and risk management, Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 17(1), pp. 55-65.
14. Earle, T. C. and Siegrist, M. (2006) Morality information, performance information, and the distinction between trust and confidence, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36(2), p. 383.
15. Frewer, L., Howard, C., Hedderley, D. and Shepherd, R. (1996) What determines trust in information about food-related risks? Underlying psychological constructs, Risk Analysis, 16(4), pp. 473-486.
16. Gambetta, D. (Ed.) (1988) Trust: Making and breaking cooperative relationships (Oxford: Basil Blackwell).
17. Gregory, R., Arvai, J. and McDaniels, T. (2001) Value-focused thinking for environmental risk consultations, in: G. Boehm & J. Nerb (Eds) Environmental risks: Perception, evaluation and management, vol. 9, pp. 249-273 (Amsterdam: Elsevier Science/JAI Press).
18. Hardin, R. (1993) The street-level epistemology of trust, Politics and Society, 21, pp. 505-529.
19. Hardin, R. (2002) Trust and Trustworthiness (New York: Russell Sage Foundation).
20. Hovland, C. I., Janis, I. L. and Kelley, H. H. (1953) Communication and Persuasion (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).
21. Johnson, B. (1999) Exploring dimensionality in the origins of hazard related trust, Journal of Risk Research, 2(4), pp. 325-354.
22. Jungermann, H., Pfister, H. and Fischer, K. (1996) Credibility, information preferences, and information interests, Risk Analysis, 16(2), pp. 251-261.
23. Kasperson, R. E., Golding, D. and Tuler, S. (1992) Social distrust as a factor in siting hazardous facilities and communicating risk, Journal of Social Issues, 48(4), pp. 161-187.
24. Lance, C. E., LaPointe, J. A. and Fisicaro, S. A. (1994a) A test of the context dependency of three causal models of halo rater error, Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(3), pp. 332-340.
25. Lance, C. E., LaPointe, J. A. and Fisicaro, S. A. (1994b) Tests of three causal models of halo rater error, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 57(1), pp. 83-96.
26. Losh, S. C. (2005) The National Science foundation Surveys of Public Understanding of Science and Technology, 1979-2001. Available at: http://www.ropercenter.uconn.edu/dataacq/nsf_surveys_ science_technology (accessed June 2006).
27. Luhmann, N. (1979) Trust and power: Two works by Niklas Luhmann (Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons).
28. March, J. G. and Olson, J. (1989) Rediscovering institutions: The organizational bias of politics (New York: Free Press).
29. McGinnies, E. and Ward, C. D. (1980) Better liked than right: Trustworthiness and expertise as factors in credibility, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 6, pp. 467-472.
30. Meglino, B. M. and Korsgaard, M. A. (2004) Considering rational self-interest as a disposition: Organizational implications of others orientation, Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(6), pp. 946-959.
31. Metlay, D. (1999) Institutional trust and confidence: A journey into a conceptual quagmire, in: G. T. Cvetkovich & R. E. Lofstedt (Eds) Social trust in the management of risk (London: Earthscan).
32. Miller, D. T. (1999) The norm of self-interest, American Psychologist, 54(12), pp. 1053-1060.
33. Nisbett, R. E. and Wilson, T. (1977) The halo effect: Evidence for unconscious alteration of judgments, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, pp. 250-256.
34. Peters, R. G., Covello, V. T. and McCallum, D. B. (1997) The determinants of trust and credibility in environmental risk communication: An empirical study, Risk Analysis, 17, pp. 43-54.
35. Poortinga, W. and Pidgeon, N. F. (2003) Exploring the dimensionality of trust in risk regulation, Risk Analysis, 23(5), pp. 961-972.
36. Poortinga, W. and Pidgeon, N. F. (2006) Prior attitudes, salient value similarity, and dimensionality: Toward an integrative model of trust in risk regulation, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36(7), pp. 1674-1700.
37. Renn, O. and Levine, D. (1991) Credibility and trust in risk communication, in: R. E. Kasperson & P. J. M. Stallen (Eds) Communicating Risks to the Public (The Hague: Kluwer).
38. Renn, O., Webler, T. and Kastenholz, H. (1996) Perception of uncertainty: Lessons for risk management and communication, in: V. H. Sublet, V. T. Covello & T. L. Tinker (Eds) Scientific uncertainty and its influence on the public communication process, pp. 163-181 (Boston: Kluwer Academic).
39. Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S. and Camerer, C. (1998) Not so different after all: A cross discipline view of trust, Academy of Management Review, 23(3), pp. 393-404.
40. Shapiro, S. P. (1987) The social control of impersonal trust, American Journal of Sociology, 93(Three), pp. 623-658.
41. Siegrist, M. (2000) The influence of trust and perceptions of risk and benefits on the acceptance of gene technology, Risk Analysis, 20(2), pp. 195-203.
42. Siegrist, M. and Cvetkovich, G. T. (2000) Perception of hazards: The role of social trust and knowledge, Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 20(5), pp. 713-720.
43. Siegrist, M., Cvetkovich, G. T. and Gutscher, H. (2001 ) Shared values, social trust, and the perception of geographic cancer clusters, Risk Analysis, 21(6), pp. 1047-1053.
44. Siegrist, M., Earle, T. C. and Gutscher, H. (2003) Test of a trust and confidence model in the applied context of electromagnetic field (EMF) risks, Risk Analysis, 23(4), pp. 705-716.
45. Siegrist, M., Gutscher, H. and Earle, T. C. (2005) Perception of risk: The influence of general trust, and general confidence, Journal of Risk Research, 8(2), pp. 145-156.
46. Skitka, L. J. (2003) Of different minds: An accessible identity model of justice reasoning, Personality & Social Psychology Review, 7(4), pp. 286-297.
47. Skitka, L. J. and Houston, D. A. (2001) When due process is of no consequence: Moral mandates and presumed defendant guilt or innocence, Social Justice Research, 14(3), pp. 305-326.
48. Skitka, L. J. and Mullen, E. (2002) Understanding judgments of fairness in a real-world political context: A test of the value protection model of justice reasoning, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, pp. 588-597.
49. Slovic, P. (1993) Perceived risk, trust, and democracy, Risk Analysis, 13, pp. 675-682.
50. Slovic, P. (1999) Trust, emotion, sex, politics, and science: Surveying the risk-assessment battlefield, Risk Analysis, 19(4), pp. 689-701.
51. Thorndike, E. L. (1920) A constant error in psychological ratings, Journal of Applied Psychology, 4, pp. 25-29.
52. Verplanken, B. and Holland, R. W. (2002) Motivated decision making: Effects of activation and self-centrality of values on choices and behavior, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(3), pp. 434-447.
53. Wexler, M. N. (1996) A sociological framing of the NIMBY (Not-in-My-Backyard) syndrome, International Review of Modern Sociology, 26(1), pp. 91-110.
54. White, M. P. and Eiser, J. R. (2005) Information specificity and hazard risk potential as moderators of trust asymmetry, Risk Analysis, 25(5), pp. 1187-1198.
55. Williamson, O. E. (1985) The Economic Institutions of Capitalism (New York: The Free Press).
56. Wolsink, M. (1994) Entanglement of interests and motives: Assumptions behind the NIMBY-theory on facility siting, Urban Studies, 31(6), pp. 851-866.