Effects of varying doses of plain bupivacaine with fentanyl in patients undergoing cesarean section: Haemodinamics and neonatal outcome

Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 324-329

  Sivevski, Atanas ^a  

^a University Clinic of Gynecology and Obstetrics   (Macedonia)

Author keywords

Cesarean delivery; Hypotension; Neonatal outcome; Spinal anaesthesia

Indexed keywords

BUPIVACAINE; EPHEDRINE; FENTANYL;

ADULT; ANESTHESIA LEVEL; APGAR SCORE; ARTICLE; BIRTH; BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING; CESAREAN SECTION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; HYPOTENSION; INCIDENCE; LOW DRUG DOSE; NEWBORN CARE; NORMAL HUMAN; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SPINAL ANESTHESIA; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UMBILICAL CORD BLOOD;

EID: 73649087583     PISSN: 18575749     EISSN: 18575773     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3889/MJMS.1857-5773.2009.0076     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Arnaout L, Ghiglione S, Figueiredo S, Mignon A. [Effects of maternal analgesia and anesthesia on the fetus and the newborn] J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2008;37 Suppl 1:S46-55. doi:10.1016/j.jgyn.2007.11.010 PMID:18191340
2. Reynolds F, Seed PT. Anaesthesia for Caesarean section and neonatal acid-base status: a meta-analysis. Anaesthesia. 2005;60(7):636-53. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2044.2005.04223.x PMID:15960713
3. Mercier FJ, Bonnet MP, De la Dorie A, Moufouki M, Banu F, Hanaf A, Edouard D, Roger-Christoph S. [Spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section: fluid loading, vasopressors and hypotension]. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2007;26(7-8):688-93. doi:10.1016/j.annfar.2007.05.003 PMID:17590565
4. Gournay VA, Roman C, RudolphAM. Effect of betaadrenergic stimulation on oxygen metabolism in the fetal lamb. Pediatric Research. 1999;45:432-6. doi:10.1203/00006450-199903000-00023 PMID:10088666
5. Lee A, Ngan Kee WD, Gin T. Prophylactic ephedrine prevents hypotension during spinal anesthesia for Cesarean delivery but does not improve neonatal outcome: a quantitative systematic review. Can J Anaesth. 2002;49(6):588-99. doi:10.1007/BF03017387 PMID:12067872
6. Roberts SW, Leveno KJ, Sidawi JE, et al. Fetal acidemia associated with regional anesthesia for elective Cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 1995; 85:79-83. doi:10.1016/0029-7844(94)P4401-9 PMID:7800330
7. Reynolds F, Seed PT. Anaesthesia for Caesarean section and neonatal acid-base status: a meta-analysis. Anaesthesia. 2005; 60:636-653. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2044.2005.04223.x PMID:15960713
8. Mueller MD, Bruhwiler H, Schupfer GK, et al. Higher rate of fetal acidemia after metabolic adaptation of the neonate. Br J Anaesth. 1993;70(1):47-53. PMID:8431333
9. Husaini S W, Russell IF. Volume preload: lack of effect in the prevention of spinal-induced hypotension at caesarean section. Anesthesiology. 1994;80(3):702-703. PMID:8141472
10. Warwick D. Ngan Kee. Managing hypotension during anaesthesia for caesarean section. Anaesthesia & Intensive Care Medicine. 2007;8(7):286-289. doi:10.1016/j.mpaic.2007.04.008
11. Moya F, Smith B. Spinal anesthesia for cesarean section. Clinical and biochemical studies of effects on maternal physiology. JAMA. 1962;179:609-14. PMID:14476744
12. Norris M C. Hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean section: Does it affect neonatal outcome. Reg Anesth. 1987;12:191-194.
13. Mattingly JE, D'Alessio J, Ramanathan J. Effects of obstetric analgesics and anesthetics on the neonate: a review. Paediatr Drugs. 2003;5(9):615-27. doi:10.2165/00148581-200305090-00004 PMID:12956618
14. Corke BC, Datta S, Ostheimer GW, Weiss GB, Alper MH. Spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section.The influence of hypotension on neonatal outcome. Anaesthesia. 1982;37(6):658-662. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2044.1982.tb01278.x PMID:7091625
15. Bassell G M. Marx G F. Intravenous fluid preload in the prevention of spinal block-induced hypotension in parturients. Anesthesiology. 1994;80(3):702-703. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199403000-00037 PMID:8141472
16. Hon EH, Reid BL, Hehre FW. The electronic evaluation of fetal heart rate. II. Changes with maternal hypotension. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1960;79:209-15. PMID:14402935
17. Ebner H, Barcohana J, Bartoshuk AK. Influence of postspinal hypotension on the fetal electrocardiogram. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1960;80:569-72. PMID:13819175
18. Ben-David B, Miller G, Gavriel R, Gurevitch A. Low-dose bupivacaine-fentanyl spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2000;25(3):235-239. doi:10.1097/00115550-200005000-00005 PMID:10834776
19. Choi DH, Ahn HJ, Kim MH: Bupivacaine-sparing effect of fentanyl in spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2000; 25(3):240-245. PMID:10834777
20. Vercauteren MP, Coppejans HC, Hoffmann VL, et al. Small-dose hyperbaric versus plain bupivacaine during spinal anesthesia for cesarean section. Anesth Analg. 1998;86(5):989-993. doi:10.1097/00000539-199805000-00014 PMID:9585282
21. Jones SJ, Kinsella SM, Donald FA. Comparison of measured and estimated angles of table tilt at Cesarean section. Br J Anaesth. 2003;90(1):86-7. doi:10.1093/bja/90.1.86 PMID:12488385
22. Clyburn P. Spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section: time for reappraisal? Anaesthesia. 2005;60(7):633-635. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2044.2005. 04282.x PMID:15960712
23. Carvalho B, Durbin M, Drover DR, Cohen SE, Y. Ginosar Y, Riley ET. The ED50 and ED95 of Intrathecal Isobaric Bupivacaine with Opioids for Cesarean Delivery. Anesthesiology. 2005;103(3):606-12. doi:10.1097/00000542-200509000- 00025 PMID:16129987