Microphase separation structure influences protein interactions with poly(urethane urea) surfaces

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part A

Volumn 92, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 126-136

  Xu, Li Chong ^a   Siedlecki, Christopher A ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

AFM; Microphase separation; Poly(urethane urea); Protein adsorption

Indexed keywords

ADHESION FORCES; AFM; AFM PROBE; BIOLOGICAL INTERACTIONS; BOVINE SERUM ALBUMINS; DYNAMIC ENVIRONMENTS; HARD DOMAIN; HYDRATION TIME; IN-SITU; INDIVIDUAL PROTEINS; LABELED PROTEINS; LOCAL ADHESION; LOCAL SURFACES; LOW ADHESION; MICRO-PHASE; MICROENVIRONMENTS; MOLECULAR LEVELS; NANO-GOLD; PHASE IMAGE; PHASE SEPARATION STRUCTURE; PHYSICAL CHARACTERIZATION; POLY(URETHANE UREA); POLYMERIC BIOMATERIALS; PROTEIN ADSORPTION; PROTEIN INTERACTION; SOFT SEGMENTS;

ADHESION; ADSORPTION; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; BIOMATERIALS; BODY FLUIDS; FORCE MEASUREMENT; HYDRATES; HYDRATION; MECHANICAL PROPERTIES; METABOLISM; PHASE SEPARATION; PROTEINS; STAINLESS STEEL; SURFACE CHEMISTRY; SURFACE STRUCTURE; UREA;

MICROPHASE SEPARATION;

BOVINE SERUM ALBUMIN; POLYURETHAN; POLYURETHAN UREA; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADSORPTION; ARTICLE; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; FEMALE; HYDROPHOBICITY; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; NONHUMAN; PHASE SEPARATION; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN MODIFICATION; SURFACE PROPERTY;

ADHESIVENESS; ADSORPTION; ANIMALS; CATTLE; MICROSCOPY, ATOMIC FORCE; POLYURETHANES; SERUM ALBUMIN, BOVINE; SOLUTIONS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TIME FACTORS; WATER;

EID: 73549105924     PISSN: 15493296     EISSN: 15524965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.32340     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Montdargent B, Letourneur D. Toward new biomaterials. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2000;21:404-410.
2. Horbett TA. Principles underlying the role of adsorbed plasma-proteins in blood interactions with foreign materials. Cardiovasc Pathol 1993;2:S137-S148.
3. Castner DG, Ratner BD. Biomedical surface science: Foundations to frontiers. Surf Sci 2002;500:28-60.
4. Anderson JM. Biological responses to materials. Annu Rev Mater Res 2001;31:81-110.
5. Weber N, Bolikal D, Bourke SL, Kohn J. Small changes in the polymer structure influence the adsorption behavior of fibrinogen on polymer surfaces: Validation of a new rapid screening technique. J Biomed Mater Res A 2004;68:496-503.
6. Roach P, Farrar D, Perry CC. Surface tailoring for controlled protein adsorption: Effect of topography at the nanometer scale and chemistry. J Am Chem Soc 2006;128:3939-3945.
7. Lundqvist M, Sethson I, Jonsson BH. Protein adsorption onto silica nanoparticles: Conformational changes depend on the particles' curvature and the protein stability. Langmuir 2004;20:10639-10647.
8. Cai KY, Bossert J, Jandt KD. Does the nanometre scale topography of titanium influence protein adsorption and cell proliferation? Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 2006;49:136-144.
9. Martins MCL, Ratner BD, Barbosa MA Protein adsorption on mixtures of hydroxyl- and methylterminated alkanethiols selfassembled monolavers. J Biomed Mater Res A 2003;67: 158-171.
10. Wu YG, Simonovsky FI, Ratner BD, Horbett TA. The role of adsorbed fibrinogen in platelet adhesion to polyurethane surfaces: A comparison of surface hydrophobicity, protein adsorption, monoclonal antibody binding, and platelet adhesion. J Biomed Mater Res A 2005;74:722-738.
11. Zdrahala RJ, Zdrahala IJ. Biomedical applications of polyurethanes: A review of past promises, present realities, and a vibrant future. J Biomater Appl 1999;14:67-90.
12. Xue L, Greisler HP. Biomaterials in the development and future of vascular grafts. J Vasc Surg 2003;37:472-480.
13. Lamba NMK, Woodhouse KA, Cooper SL. Polyurethanes in Biomedical Applications. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 1998.
14. Wang YX, Robertson JL, Spillman WB, Claus RO. Effects of the chemical structure and the surface properties of polymeric biomaterials on their biocompatibility. Pharm Res 2004;21:1362-1373.
15. Bernacca GM, Gulbransen MJ, Wilkinson R, Wheatley DJ. In vitro blood compatibility of surface-modified polyurethanes. Biomaterials 1998;19:1151-1165.
16. Brunstedt MR, Ziats NP, Robertson SP, Hiltner A, Anderson JM, Lodeon GA, Payet CR. Protein adsorption to poly(ether urethane ureas) modified with acrylate and methacrylate polymer and copolymer additives. J Biomed Mater Res 1993;27:367-377.
17. Pitt WG, Weaver DR, Cooper SL. Fibronectin adsorption kinetics on phase segregated polyurethane ureas. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 1993;4:337-346.
18. Huang SL, Chao MS, Ruaan RC, Lai JY. Microphase separated structure and protein adsorption of polyurethanes with butadiene soft segment. Eur Polym J 2000;36:285-294.
19. Hsu SH, Kao YC. Biocompatibility of poly(carbonate urethane) s with various degrees of nanophase separation. Macromol Biosci 2005;5:246-253.
20. Goodman SL, Simmons SR, Cooper SL, Albrecht RM. Preferential adsorption of plasma-proteins onto apolar polyurethane microdomains. J Colloid Interface Sci 1990;139:561-570.
21. Groth T, Klosz K, Campbell EJ, New RRC, Hall B, Goering H. Protein adsorption, lymphocyte adhesion and plateletadhesion activation on polyurethane ureas is related to hard segment content and composition. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 1994;6:497-510.
22. Grasel TG, Cooper SL. Surface-properties and blood compatibility of polyurethaneureas. Biomaterials 1986;7:315-328.
23. Goodman SL, Grasel TG, Cooper SL, Albrecht RM. Platelet shape change and cytoskeletal reorganization on polyurethaneureas. J Biomed Mater Res 1989;23:105-123.
24. Hsu SH, Kao YC. Cell attachment and proliferation on poly (carbonate urethanes) with various degrees of nanophase separation. Macromol Biosci 2004;4:891-900.
25. Goodman SL, Cooper SL, Albrecht RM. Polyurethane support films-Structure and cellular adhesion. Scanning Microsc 1989:285-295.
26. Tingey KG, Andrade JD. Probing surface microheterogeneity of poly(ether urethanes) in an aqueous environment. Langmuir 1991;7:2471-2478.
27. Lewis KB, Ratner BD. Observation of surface rearrangement of polymers using ESCA. J Colloid Interface Sci 1993;159:77-85.
28. Agnihotri A, Garrett JT, Runt J, Siedlecki CA. Atomic force microscopy visualization of poly(urethane urea) microphase rearrangements under aqueous environment. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 2006;17:227-238.
29. Holland NB, Marchant RE. Individual plasma proteins detected on rough biomaterials by phase imaging AFM. J Biomed Mater Res 2000;51:307-315.
30. Kumar N, Hahm JI. Nanoscale protein patterning using self-assembled diblock copolymers. Langmuir 2005;21:6652-6655.
31. Xu LC, Logan BE. Interaction forces between colloids and protein-coated surfaces measured using an atomic force microscope. Environ Sci Technol 2005;39:3592-3600.
32. Agnihotri A, Siedlecki CA. Adhesion mode atomic force microscopy study of dual component protein films. Ultramicroscopy 2005;102:257-268.
33. McLean RS, Sauer BB. Tapping-mode AFM studies using phase detection for resolution of nanophases in segmented polyurethanes and other block copolymers. Macromolecules 1997;30:8314-8317.
34. Garrett JT, Siedlecki CA, Runt J. Microdomain morphology of poly(urethane urea) multiblock copolymers. Macromolecules 2001;34:7066-7070.
35. Revenko I, Tang Y, Santerre JP. Surface structure of polycarbonate urethanes visualized by atomic force microscopy. Surf Sci 2001;491:346-354.
36. Aneja A, Wilkes GL. A systematic series of 'model' PTMO based segmented polyurethanes reinvestigated using atomic force microscopy. Polymer 2003;44:7221-7228.
37. Xu LC, Soman P, Runt J, Siedlecki CA. Characterization of surface microphase structures of poly(urethane urea) biomaterials by nanoscale indentation with AFM. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 2007;18:353-368.
38. Garrett JT, Runt J, Lin JS. Microphase separation of segmented poly(urethane urea) block copolymers. Macromolecules 2000;33:6353-6359.
39. Chizhik SA, Huang Z, Gorbunov VV, Myshkin NK, Tsukruk VV. Micromechanical properties of elastic polymeric materials as probed by scanning force microscopy. Langmuir 1998;14:2606-2609.
40. Mamunya YP, Shtompel VI, Lebedev EV, Pissis P, Kanapitsas A, Boiteux G. Structure and water sorption of polyurethane nanocomposites based on organic and inorganic components. Eur Polym J 2004;40:2323-2331.
41. Magonov SN, Elings V, Whangbo MH. Phase imaging and stiffness in tapping-mode atomic force microscopy. Surf Sci 1997;375:L385-L391.
42. Chen X, Roberts CJ, Zhang J, Davies MC, Tendler SJB. Phase contrast and attraction-repulsion transition in tapping mode atomic force microscopy. Surf Sci 2002;519:L593-L598.
43. Kim JM, Jung HS, Park JW, Lee HY, Kawai T. AFM phase lag mapping for protein-DNA oligonucleotide complexes. Anal Chim Acta 2004;525:151-157.
44. Lin HB, Lewis KB, Leachscampavia D, Ratner BD, Cooper SL. Surface-properties of RGD-peptide grafted polyurethane block copolymers-Variable take-off angle and cold-stage ESCA studies. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 1993;4:183-198.
45. Hussain MA, Agnihotri A, Siedlecki CA. AFM imaging of ligand binding to platelet integrin alpha(IIb)beta(3) receptors reconstituted into planar lipid bilayers. Langmuir 2005;21:6979-6986.
46. Soman P, Rice Z, Siedlecki CA. Immunological identification of fibrinogen in dual-component protein films by AFM imaging. Micron 2008;39:832-842.
47. Eppell SJ, Simmons SR, Albrecht RM, Marchant RE. Cell-surface receptors and proteins on platelets imaged by scanning force microscopy using immunogold contrast enhancement. Biophys J 1995;68:671-680.
48. Lin H, Lal R, Clegg D. Imaging and mapping heparin-binding sites on single fibronectin molecules with atomic force microscopy. Biochemistry 2000;39:3192-3196.
49. Raghavachari M, Kottke-Marchant K, Marchant R. Determining intramolecular binding sites on surface-bound von Willebrand factor under aqueous conditions. Thromb Res 2000;98:351-358.
50. Elwing H, Askendal A, Lundstrom I. Competition between adsorbed fibrinogen and high molecular weight kininogen on solid surfaces incubated in human plasma (the Vroman effect)-influenced of solid-surface wettability. J Biomed Mater Res 1987;21:1023-1028.
51. Morin C, Hitchcock AR, Cornelius RM, Brash JL, Urquhart SG, Scholl A, Doran A. Selective adsorption of protein on polymer surfaces studied by soft X-ray photoemission electron microscopy. J Electron Spectrosc Relat Phenom 2004;137:785-794.
52. Li L, Hitchcock AP, Cornelius R, Brash JL, Scholl A, Doran A. X-ray microscopy studies of protein adsorption on a phase segregated polystyrene/polymethylmethacrylate surface. II. Effect of pH on site preference. J Phys Chem B 2008;112: 2150-2158.
53. Li L, Hitchcock AP, Robar N, Cornelius R, Brash JL, Scholl A, Doran A. X-ray microscopy studies of protein adsorption on a phase-segregated polystyrene/polymethyl methacrylate surface. I. Concentration and exposure-time dependence for albumin adsorption. J Phys Chem B 2006;110:16763-16773.