Preparation and characterization of Antheraea assama silk fibroin based novel non-woven scaffold for tissue engineering applications

Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine

Volumn 3, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 539-552

  Kasoju, Naresh ^a   Bhonde, Ramesh R ^b   Bora, Utpal ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY GUWAHATI   (India)

^b NATIONAL CENTRE FOR CELL SCIENCE   (India)

Author keywords

Angiogenesis; Antheraea assama; Biocompatible; Biodegradable; Silk fibroin; Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine

Indexed keywords

BIODEGRADABILITY; BIOMECHANICS; BIOMIMETICS; CELL CULTURE; CELLS; COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE; FLUORIDATION; LANTHANUM COMPOUNDS; NITRIC OXIDE; PLATELETS; PORE SIZE; REGENERATIVE MEDICINE; SCAFFOLDS (BIOLOGY); TENSILE TESTING; TISSUE; WEAVING;

ANGIOGENESIS; ANTHERAEA ASSAMUM; BIODEGRADABLE; NON-WOVEN SCAFFOLDS; REGENERATIVE MEDICINE; SCAFFOLDS FOR TISSUE ENGINEERING; SILK FIBROIN; TISSUE ENGINEERING AND REGENERATIVE MEDICINE; TISSUE ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS; TISSUES ENGINEERINGS;

BIOCOMPATIBILITY;

BIOMATERIAL; BIOMIMETIC MATERIAL; COLLAGEN; NITRIC OXIDE; SILK FIBROIN; TRYPSIN;

ADSORPTION; ANGIOGENESIS; ANTHERAEA ASSAMA; ARTICLE; BETA SHEET; BIODEGRADABILITY; BLOOD CLOTTING TIME; BLOOD COMPATIBILITY; CELL ADHESION; CELL GROWTH; CELL MIGRATION; CELL SPREADING; CELL STRAIN HEPG2; CELL VIABILITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; HELA CELL; HEMOLYSIS; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; LEUKOCYTE COUNT; NONHUMAN; PARTICLE SIZE; POROSITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SILKWORM; TENSILE STRENGTH; THERMOSTABILITY; THROMBOCYTE ADHESION; THROMBOCYTE COUNT; TISSUE ENGINEERING; WATER TRANSPORT;

EID: 73449146963     PISSN: 19326254     EISSN: 19327005     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/term.196     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Acharya C, Ghosh SK, Kundu SC. 2009; Silk fibroin from non-mulberry tropical tasar silkworms: a novel substrate for in vitro fibroblast culture. Acta Biomater 5: 429-436.
2. Altman GH, Diaz F, Jakuba C, et al. 2003; Silk-based biomaterials. Biomaterials 24: 401-416.
3. Arai T, Freddi G, Innocenti R, et al. 2004; Biodegradation of Bombyx mori silk fibroin fibers and films. J Appl Polym Sci 91: 2383-2390.
4. Armato U, Dal Pra I, Motta A, et al. 2002; Method for the preparation of a non-woven silk fibroin fabric. Patent No. PCT/IT2001/00501.
5. Atala A. 2007; Engineering tissues, organs and cells. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 1: 83-96.
6. Azzarello J, Ihnat MA, Kropp BP, et al. 2007; Assessment of angiogenic properties of biomaterials using the chicken embryo chorioallantoic membrane assay. Biomed Mater 2: 55-61.
7. Binyamin G, Shafi BM, Mery CM. 2006; Biomaterials: a primer for surgeons. Semin Pediatr Surg 15: 276-283.
8. Cheung HY, Lau KT, Lu TP, et al. 2007; A critical review on polymerbased bio-engineered materials for scaffold development. Compos Part B Eng 38: 291-300.
9. Cooke JP. 2003; NO and angiogenesis. Atheroscler Suppl 4: 53-60.
10. Daar AS, Greenwood HL. 2007; A proposed definition of regenerative medicine. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 1: 179-184.
11. Dal Pra I, Chiarini A, Boschi A, et al. 2006; Novel dermo-epidermal equivalents on silk fibroin-based formic acid-crosslinked three-dimensional non-woven devices with prospective applications in human tissue engineering/regeneration/repair. Int J Mol Med 18: 241-247.
12. Dal Pra I, Freddi G, Minic J, et al. 2005; De novo engineering of reticular connective tissue in vivo by silk fibroin non-woven materials. Biomaterials 26: 1987-1999.
13. Dauner M. Non-woven technologies for medical implants. http:// www.tessileesalute.it/flex/files/af163d1c6a85b2258916.pdf
14. Edwards SL, Mitchell W, Matthews JB, et al. 2004; Design of non-woven scaffold structures for tissue engineering of the anterior cruciate ligament. AUTEX Res J 4: http://www.autexrj.org/No2-2004/0082.pdf.
15. Freddi G, Gotoh Y, Mori T, et al. 1994; Chemical structure and physical properties of Antheraea assama silk. J Appl Polym Sci 52: 775-781.
16. Hakimi O, Knight DP, Vollrath F, et al. 2007; Spider and mulberry silkworm silks as compatible biomaterials. Compos Part B Eng 38: 324-337.
17. Hardy JG, Romer LM, Scheibel TR. 2008; Polymeric materials based on silk proteins. Polymer 49: 4309-4327.
18. Hazarika LK, Saikia CN, Kataky A, et al. 1998; Evaluation of physicochemical characteristics of silk fibers of Antheraea assama reared on different host plants. Bioresour Technol 64: 67-70.
19. Horan RL, Antle K, Collette AL, et al. 2005; In vitro degradation of silk fibroin. Biomaterials 26: 3385-3393.
20. Imai Y, Nose Y. 1972; A new method for evaluation of antithrombogenicity of materials. J Biomed Mater Res 6: 165-172.
21. Khattak SF, Spatara M, Roberts L, et al. 2006; Application of colorimetric assays to assess viability, growth and metabolism of hydrogel-encapsulated cels. Biotechnol Lett 28: 1361-1370.
22. Klueh U, Dorsky DI, Moussy F, et al. 2003; Ex ova chick chorioallantoic membrane as a novel model for evaluation of tissue responses to biomaterials and implants. J Biomed Mater Res 67A: 838-843.
23. Langer R, Vacanti JP. 1993; Tissue engineering. Science 260: 920-926.
24. Li M, Tao W, Lu S, et al. 2007; Porous 3D scaffolds from regenerated Antheraea pernyi silk fibroin. Polym Adv Technol 19: 207-212.
25. Ma PX. 2008; Biomimetic materials for tissue engineering. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 60: 184-198.
26. Mano JF, Silva GA, Azevedo HS, et al. 2007; Natural origin biodegradable systems in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine: present status and some moving trends. J R Soc Interface 4: 999-1030.
27. Miller WJ, Kayton ML, Patton A, et al. 2004; A novel technique for quantifying changes in vascular density, endothelial cell proliferation and protein expression in response to modulators of angiogenesis using the chick chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) assay. J TranslMed 2: 4.
28. Mosmann T. 1982; Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J Immunol Methods 65: 55-63.
29. Nazarov R, Jin HJ, Kaplan DL. 2004; Porous 3-D scaffolds from regenerated silk fibroin. Biomacromolecules 5: 718-726.
30. Pabbruwe MB, Stewart K, Chaudhuri JB. 2005; A comparison of colorimetric and DNA quantification assays for the assessment of meniscal fibrochondrocyte proliferation in microcarrier culture. Biotechnol Lett 27: 1451-1455.
31. Rajkhowa R, Gupta VB, Kothari VK. 2000; Tensile stress-strain and recovery behavior of Indian silk fibers and their structural dependence. J Appl Polym Sci 77: 2418-2429.
32. Ribatti D, Vacca A, Roncali L, et al. 1996; The chick embryo chorioallantoic membrane as a model for in vivo research on angiogenesis. Int J Dev Biol 40: 1189-1197.
33. Sachlos E, Czernuszka JT. 2003; Making tissue engineering scaffolds work. Review on the application of solid freeform fabrication technology to the production of tissue engineering scaffolds. Eur Cell Mater 5: 29-40.
34. Santin M, Motta A, Freddi G, et al. 1999; In vitro evaluation of the inflammatory potential of the silk fibroin. J Biomed Mater Res 46: 382-389.
35. Seal BL, Otero TC, Panitch A. 2001; Polymeric biomaterials for tissue and organ regeneration. Mater Sci Eng R Rep 34: 147-230.
36. Singh J, RayAR, Singhal JP, et al. 1990; Radiation-induced graft copolymerization of methacrylic acid on to poly(vinyl chloride) films and their thrombogenicity. Biomaterials 11: 473-476.
37. Spector M. 2006; Biomaterials-based tissue engineering and regenerative medicine solutions to musculoskeletal problems. Swiss Med Wkly 136: 293-301.
38. Taddei P, Arai T, Boschi A, et al. 2006; In vitro study of the proteolytic degradation of Antheraea pernyi silk fibroin. Biomacromolecules 7: 259-267.
39. Taddei P, ArosioC, Monti P, et al. 2007; Chemical and physical properties of sulfated silk fabrics. Biomacromolecules 8: 1200-1208.
40. Tamada Y. 2004; Sulfation of silk fibroin by chlorosulfonic acid and the anticoagulant activity. Biomaterials 25: 377-383.
41. Tullberg-Reinert H, Jundt G. 1999; In situ measurement of collagen synthesis by human bone cells with a Sirius red-based colorimetric microassay: effects of transforming growth factor β 2 and ascorbic acid 2-phosphate. Histochem Cell Biol 112: 271-276.
42. Valdes TI, Kreutzer DL, Moussy F. 2002; The chick chorioallantoic membrane as a novel model for the testing of biomaterials. J Biomed Mater Res 62: 273-282.
43. Vasconcelos A, Freddi G, Cavaco-Paulo A. 2008; Biodegradable materials based on silk fibroin and keratin. Biomacromolecules 9: 1299-1305.
44. Vepari C, Kaplan DL. 2007; Silk as a biomaterial. Prog Polym Sci 32: 991-1007.
45. Wang Y, Rudym DD, Walsh A, et al. 2008; In vivo degradation of three-dimensional silk fibroin scaffolds. Biomaterials 29: 3415-3428.
46. Williams DF. 2006; To engineer is to create: the link between engineering and regeneration. Trends Biotechnol 24: 4-8.
47. Williams DF. 2008; On the mechanisms of biocompatibility. Biomaterials 29: 2941-2953.
48. Wilson D, Valluzzi R, Kaplan D. 2000; Conformational transitions in model silk peptides. Biophys J 78: 2690-2701.
49. Wilting J, Christ B, Bokeloh M. 1991; A modified chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) assay for qualitative and quantitative study of growth factors. Anat Embryol 183: 259-271.
50. Wink DA, Mitchell JB. 1998; Chemical biology of nitric oxide: insights into regulatory, cytotoxic, and cytoprotective mechanisms of nitric oxide, Free Radic Biol Med 25: 434-456.
51. Zwadlo-Klarwasser G, Gorlitz K, Hafemann B, et al. 2001; The chorioallantoic membrane of the chick embryo as a simple model for the study of the angiogenic and inflammatory response to biomaterials. J Mater Sci Mater Med 12: 195-199.