Gene set enrichment analysis made simple

Statistical Methods in Medical Research

Volumn 18, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 565-575

  Irizarry, Rafael A ^a   Wang, Chi ^b   Zhou, Yun ^c   Speed, Terence P ^d  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS BLOOMBERG SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c GILEAD SCIENCES   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE IDENTIFICATION; GENE SET ENRICHED ANALYSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LUNG CANCER; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATABASES, GENETIC; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; HUMANS; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; PHENOTYPE;

EID: 73449134439     PISSN: 09622802     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0962280209351908     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Tusher VG, Tibshirani R., Chu G. Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2001; 98 (18). 10515.
2. Smyth GK Linear models and empirical bayes methods for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments. Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology 2004; 3 (1). 1-25.
3. Storey JD, Tibshirani R. Statistical significance for genomewide studies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sceinces 2003; 100 (16). 9440-9445.
4. Dudoit S., Shaffer JP, Boldrick JC Multiple hypothesis testing in microarray experiments. Statistical Science 2003; 18: 71-103. (Pubitemid 41461823)
5. Lee HK, Braynen W., Keshav K., Pavlidis P. Erminej: Tool for functional analysis of gene expression data sets. BMC Bioinformatics 2005; 6: 269.
6. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nature Genetics 2000; 25: 25-29.
7. Mootha VK, Lindgren CM, Eriksson KF et al. Pgc-1alpha-responsive genes involved in oxidative phosphorylation are coordinately downregulated in human diabetes. Nature Genetics 2003; 34 (3). 267-273.
8. Pavlidis P., Lewis DP, Noble WS Exploring gene expression data with class scores. In Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing 2002: 474-485.
9. Pavlidis P., Qin J., Arango V., Mann JJ, Sibille E. Using the gene ontology for microarray data mining: a comparison of methods and application to age effects in human prefrontal cortex. Neurochemical Research 2004; 29: 1213-1222.
10. Goeman J., van de Geer S., de Kort F., van Houwelingen H. A global test for groups of genes: testing association with a clinical outcome. Bioinformatics 2004; 20: 93-99.
11. Goeman JJ, Oosting J., Cleton-Jansen AM, Anninga JK, van Houwelingen HC Testing association of a pathway with survival using gene expression data. Bioinformatics 2005; 21 (9). 1950-1957.
12. Kim SY, Volsky DJ PAGE: Parametric analysis of gene set enrichment. BMC Bioinformatics 2005; 6 (144). 1-12.
13. Subramanian A., Tamayo P., Mootha VK et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences 2005; 102 (43). 15545-15550.
14. Tian L., Greenberg SA, Kong SW, Altschuler J., Kohane IS, Park PJ Discovering statistically significant pathways in expression profiling studies. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences 2005; 102 (38). 13544-13549.
15. Storey JD A direct approach to false discovery rates. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B 2002; 64: 479-498.
16. Kendziorski C., Irizarry RA, Chen KS, Haag JD, Gould MN On the utility of pooling biological samples in microarray experiments. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences 2005; 102 (12). 4252-4257.
17. Efron B., Tibshirani R. On testing the significance of sets of genes. Annals of Applied Statistics 2007; 1 (1). 107-129.
18. Falcon S., Gentleman R. Using gostats to test gene lists for go term association. Bioinformatics 2006; 567 (1). 257-258.