Ethanol production from modified and conventional dry-grind processes using different corn types

Cereal Chemistry

Volumn 86, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 616-622

  Khullar, Esha ^a   Sall, Erik D ^b   Rausch, Kent D ^a   Tumbleson, M E ^a   Singh, Vijay ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b MONSANTO COMPANY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ETHANOL; FIBERS; GRINDING (MACHINING);

DRY FRACTIONATIONS; DRY GRIND PROCESS; ETHANOL CONCENTRATIONS; ETHANOL PRODUCTION; EXTRACTABILITY; FRACTIONATION METHODS; FRACTIONATION PROCESS; HAMMERMILLS; WAXY CORN; WET FRACTIONATION;

STARCH;

ZEA MAYS;

EID: 73449096795     PISSN: 00090352     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1094/CCHEM-86-6-0616     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. AOAC. 2003. Official Methods of the AOAC., 16th Ed Methods 945.16, 4.2.08, 979.10, 979.10 16. The Association: Gaithersburg, MD.
2. ASABE. 2008. ASABE Standard Method S319.4. Method of determining and expressing fineness of feed materials by sieving. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers: St. Joseph, MI.
3. Bryan, T. 2005. Changing the game. Ethanol Producer Magazine 11:58-63.
4. Eckhoff, S. R. 1995. Future of commodity corn. Wet Milling Note 11. University of Illinois: Urbana, IL.
5. Eckhoff, S. R., Singh, S. K., Zehr, B. E., Rausch, K. D., Fox, E. J., Mistry, A. K., Haken, A. E., Niu, Y. X., Zou, S. H., Buriak, P., Tumbleson, M. E., and Keeling, P. L. 1996. A 100-g laboratory corn wet-milling procedure. Cereal Chem. 73:54-57.
6. Feng, F., Myers, D. J., Hojilla-Evangelista, M. P., Miller, K. A., Johnson, L. A., and Singh, S. K. 2002. Quality of corn oil obtained by sequential extraction processing. Cereal Chem. 79:707-709.
7. Johnston, D. B., and Singh, V. 2004. Enzymatic milling of corn: Optimization of soaking, grinding and enzyme incubation steps. Cereal Chem. 81:626-632.
8. Johnston, D. B., McAloon, A. J., Moreau, R. A., Hicks, K. B., and Singh, V. 2005. Composition and economic comparison of germ fractions derived from modified corn processing technologies. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 82:603-608.
9. Moreau, R. A., Powell, M. J., and Hicks, K. B. 1996. Extraction and quantitative analysis of oil from commercial corn fiber. J. Agric. Food Chem. 44:2149-2154
10. Moreau, R. A., Hicks, K. B., Nicolosi, R. J., and Norton, R. A. 1998. Corn fiber oil: Preparation and use. U. S. patent 5, 843, 499.
11. Moreau, R. A., Singh, V., Eckhoff, S. R., Powell, M. J., Hicks, K. B., and Norton, R. A. 1999. Comparison of the yield and composition of corn fiber oil and corn bran oil. Cereal Chem. 76:449-451.
12. Murthy, G. S., Johnston, D. B., and Singh, V. 2004. Comparison of dry and wet milling degerm defiber processes for ethanol production. Abstr. 97. 2004 AACC Annual Meeting. Published online. AACC International: St. Paul, MN.
13. Murthy, G. S., Singh, V., Johnston, D. B., Rausch, K. D., and Tumbleson, M. E. 2006. Evaluation and strategies to improve fermentation characteristics of modified dry-grind corn processes. Cereal Chem. 83:455-459.
14. Owens, F. 2005. Corn genetics and animal feeding value. Pioneer Hi-Bred International: Johnston, IA.
15. Peplinski, A. J., Paulsen, M. R., Anderson, R. A., and Kwolek, W. F. 1989. Physical, chemical and dry-milling characteristics of corn hybrids from various genotypes. Cereal Chem. 66:117-120.
16. RFA. 2007. Annual Industry Outlook. Available online at: www.ethanolrfa.org/objects/pdf/outlook/RFA-Outlook-2007.pdf. Renewable Fuels Association: Washington, DC.
17. Sharma, V., Graeber, J. V., and Singh, V. 2006. Effect of hybrid variability on modified E-Mill dry grind process. Paper 066232. ASABE: St. Joseph, MI.
18. Sharma, V., Rausch, K. D., Tumbleson, M. E., and Singh, V. 2007. Comparison between granular starch hydrolyzing enzyme and conventional enzymes for ethanol production from maize starch with different amylose:amylopectin ratios. Starch/Starke 59:549-556.
19. Singh, V., Haken, A. E., Niu, Y. X., Zou, S. H., and Eckhoff, S. R. 1997. Hybrid dependent effect of lactic acid on corn starch yields. Cereal Chem. 74:249-253.
20. Singh, V., Haken, A. E., Paulsen, M. R., and Eckhoff, S. R. 1998. Starch yield sensitivity of maize hybrids to drying temperature and harvest moisture content. Starch/Staerke 50:181-183.
21. Singh, V., Moreau, R. A., Doner, L. W., Eckhoff, S. R., and Hicks, K. B. 1999. Recovery of fiber in the corn dry-grind ethanol process: Feedstock for valuable coproducts. Cereal Chem. 76:868-872. Singh, V., Dien, B. S., Johnston, D. B., and Hicks, K. B., and Cotta, M. A. 2004. A comparison between conversion of pericarp and endosperm fiber from corn into ethanol. Paper No. 046056. ASAE/CSAE: St. Joseph, MI.
22. Singh, V., Johnston, D. B., Naidu, K., Rausch, K. D., Belyea, R. L., and Tumbleson, M. E. 2005. Comparison of modified dry grind processes for fermentation characteristics and DDGS composition. Cereal Chem. 82:187-190.
23. Taylor, F., McAloon, A. J., Craig, Jr., J. C., Yang, P., Wahjudi, J., and Eckhoff, S. R. 2001. Fermentation and cost of fuel ethanol from corn with quick-germ process. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 94:41-49.
24. Wang, P., Singh, V., Xu, L., Johnston, D. B., Rausch, K. D., and Tumbleson, M. E. 2005. Comparison of enzymatic (e-mill) and conventional dry grind corn processes using a granular starch hydrolyzing enzyme. Cereal Chem. 82:734-738.
25. Weber, E. J. 1987. Pages 311-349 in: Corn: Chemistry and Technology. S. A. Watson and P. E. Ramstad, eds. AACC International: St. Paul, MN.