Chinese women's preferences for prenatal diagnostic procedure and their willingness to trade between procedures

Prenatal Diagnosis

Volumn 29, Issue 13, 2009, Pages 1270-1276

  Chan, Yiu Man ^a   Sahota, Daljit Singh ^a   Leung, Tak Yeung ^a   Choy, Kwong Wai ^a   Chan, Oi Ka ^a   Lau, Tze Kin ^a  

^a CHINESE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Chinese; Discrete choice experiment; Preferences; Prenatal diagnosis tests

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANEUPLOIDY; ARTICLE; CHINESE; CHROMOSOME ABERRATION; COST; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; DOWN SYNDROME; FEMALE; HUMAN; KARYOTYPING; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; PRENATAL SCREENING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; TIME;

ADULT; ANEUPLOIDY; CHINA; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; KARYOTYPING; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS;

EID: 73449088771     PISSN: 01973851     EISSN: 10970223     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pd.2394     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Bui TH. 2007. Prenatal cytogenetic diagnosis: gone FISHing, BAC soon!. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 30: 247-251.
2. Caine A, Maltby AE, Parkin CA, et al. 2005. Prenatal detection of Down's syndrome by rapid aneuploidy testing for chromosomes 13, 18, and 21 by FISH or PCR without a full karyotype: a cytogenetic risk assessment. Lancet 366: 123-128.
3. Campbell MK, Torgerson DJ. 1999. Bootstrapping: estimating confidence intervals for cost-effectiveness ratios. Q J Med 92: 177-182.
4. Caughey AB, Washington AE, Gildengorin V, Kuppermann M. 2004. Assessment of demand for prenatal diagnostic testing using willingness to pay. Obstet Gynecol 103: 539-545.
5. Census and Statistics Department. 2007. Hong Kong 2006 Population By-census - Main Tables. The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. Government Logistics Department, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Government.
6. Chan YM, Leung TN, Leung TY, et al. 2006. The utility assessment of Chinese pregnant women towards the birth of a baby with Down syndrome compared to a procedure-related miscarriage. Prenat Diagn 26: 819-824.
7. Cheng PJ, Wu TL, Shaw SW, et al. 2008. Anxiety levels in women undergoing prenatal maternal serum screening for Down syndrome: the effect of a fast reporting system by mobile phone short-message service. Prenat Diagn 28: 417-421.
8. Chitty LS, Kagan KO, Molina FS, et al. 2006. Fetal nuchal translucency scan and early prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities by rapid aneuploidy screening: observational study. Br Med J 332: 452-455.
9. Cirigliano V, Voglino G, Marongiu A, et al. 2006. Rapid prenatal diagnosis by QF-PCR: evaluation of 30,000 consecutive clinical samples and future applications. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1075: 288-298.
10. Grimshaw GM, Szczepura A, Hultén M, et al. 2003. Evaluation of molecular tests for prenatal diagnosis of chromosome abnormalities. Health Technol Assess 7: 1-146.
11. Hahn GJ and Shapiro SS. 1966. A Catalog and Computer Program for the Design and Analysis of Orthogonal Symmetric and Asymmetric Fractional Factorial Experiments. Technical Report No 66-C165. General Electric Research and Development Center: Schenectady, New York.
12. Hewison J, Nixon J, Fountain J, et al. 2007. A randomised trial of two methods of issuing prenatal test results: the ARIA (Amniocentesis Results: Investigation of Anxiety) trial. Br J Obstet Gynecol 114: 462-468.
13. Hong Kong SAR Government. 1995. White paper on Rehabilitation - Equal Opportunities and Full Integration: A Better Tomorrow for All.
14. Kind P, Dolan P, Gudex C, Williams A. 1998. Variations in population health status: results from a United Kingdom national questionnaire survey. Br Med J 316: 736-741.
15. Kleinveld JH, Timmermans DR, de Smit DJ, et al. 2006. Does prenatal screening influence anxiety levels of pregnant women? A longitudinal randomised controlled trial. Prenat Diagn 26: 354-361.
16. Lam LW, Mackenzie AE. 2002. Coping with a child with Down syndrome: the experiences of mothers in Hong Kong. Qual Health Res 12: 223-237.
17. Leung TN, Chau MC, Chang JJ, et al. 2004. Attitudes towards termination of pregnancy among Hong Kong Chinese women attending prenatal diagnosis counselling clinic. Prenat Diagn 24: 546-551.
18. Leung WC, Lam YH, Wong Y, et al. 2002. The effect of fast reporting by amnio-PCR on anxiety levels in women with positive biochemical screening for Down syndrome-a randomized controlled trial. Prenat Diagn 22: 256-259.
19. Leung WC, Lao TT. 2005. Rapid aneuploidy testing, traditional karyotyping, or both? Lancet 366: 97-98.
20. Leung WC, Lau ET, Lao TT, Tang MH. 2003. Can amniopolymerase chain reaction alone replace conventional cytogenetic study for women with positive biochemical screening for fetal Down syndrome? Obstet Gynecol 101: 856-861.
21. Lo TK, Lai FK, Leung WC, et al. 2009. Screening options for Down syndrome: how women choose in real clinical setting. Prenat Diagn PMID: 19701862.
22. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. 2008. Antenatal Care: Routine Care for Healthy Pregnant Woman NICE Clinical Guideline 62.
23. NEQAS. 2001. National External Quality Assessment Service Scheme. Annual Report, 2001.
24. Ogilvie CM, Lashwood A, Chitty L, et al. 2005. The future of prenatal diagnosis: rapid testing or full karyotype? An audit of chromosome abnormalities and pregnancy outcomes for women referred for Down's Syndrome testing. Br J Obstet Gynecol 112: 1369-1375.
25. Pearmain D, Swanson J, Kroes E, Bradley M. 1991. Stated Preference Techniques: A Guide to Practice. Steer Davis Gleave and Hague Consulting Group: The Hague.
26. Ryan M, Diack J, Watson V, Smith N. 2005. Rapid prenatal diagnostic testing for Down syndrome only or longer wait for full karyotype: the views of pregnant women. Prenat Diagn 25: 1206-1211.
27. Ryan M, Scott DA, Reeves C, et al. 2001. Eliciting public preferences for healthcare: a systematic review of techniques. Health Technol Assess 5: 1-186.
28. Shaffer LG, Bui TH. 2007. Molecular cytogenetic and rapid aneuploidy detection methods in prenatal diagnosis. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 145C: 87-98.
29. Shek TL. 1988. Reliability and factorial structure of the Chinese version of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 10: 303-315.
30. Spielberger CD, Gorsuch RL, Lushene R, et al. 1983. State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for Adults - Sampler Set: Manual, Test, Scoring Key. Mind Garden: Palo Alto, CA.
31. Teixeira JM, Fisk NM, Glover V. 1999. Association between maternal anxiety in pregnancy and increased uterine artery resistance index: cohort based study. Br Med J 318: 153-157.
32. The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Gazette. 2003. Department of Health - List of Charges (Notice Number 2028).
33. Waters JJ, Waters KS. 1999. Trends in cytogenetic prenatal diagnosis in the UK: Results from UKNEQAS external audit, 1987-1998. Prenat Diagn 19: 1023-1026.
34. Weinans MJ, Huijssoon AM, Tymstra T, et al. 2000. How women deal with the results of serum screening for Down syndrome in the second trimester of pregnancy. Prenat Diagn 20: 705-708.