-
1
-
-
4043102494
-
Women and health care professionals' preferences for Down's Syndrome screening tests: A conjoint analysis study
-
DOI 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00197.x
-
Bishop AJ, Marteau TM, Armstrong D, et al. 2004. Women and health care professionals' preferences for Down's syndrome screening tests: a conjoint analysis study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 111: 775-779. (Pubitemid 39061498)
-
(2004)
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
, vol.111
, Issue.8
, pp. 775-779
-
-
Bishop, A.J.1
Marteau, T.M.2
Armstrong, D.3
Chitty, L.S.4
Longworth, L.5
Buxton, M.J.6
Berlin, C.7
-
2
-
-
31544450537
-
Expectation and knowledge of women undergoing first-trimester combined screening for Down syndrome in a Chinese population
-
Chan LW, Chau MCM, Leung TY, Fun TY, Leung TN, Lau TK. 2005. Expectation and knowledge of women undergoing first-trimester combined screening for Down syndrome in a Chinese population. Prenat Diagn 25: 1248-1252.
-
(2005)
Prenat Diagn
, vol.25
, pp. 1248-1252
-
-
Chan, L.W.1
Chau, M.C.M.2
Leung, T.Y.3
Fun, T.Y.4
Leung, T.N.5
Lau, T.K.6
-
3
-
-
33749463201
-
The utility assessment of Chinese pregnant women towards the birth of a baby with Down syndrome compared to a procedure-related miscarriage
-
Chan YM, Leung TN, Leung TY, Fung TY, Chan LW, Lau TK. 2006. The utility assessment of Chinese pregnant women towards the birth of a baby with Down syndrome compared to a procedure-related miscarriage. Prenat Diagn 26: 819-824.
-
(2006)
Prenat Diagn
, vol.26
, pp. 819-824
-
-
Chan, Y.M.1
Leung, T.N.2
Leung, T.Y.3
Fung, T.Y.4
Chan, L.W.5
Lau, T.K.6
-
4
-
-
0035990138
-
Womens' preference in Down syndrome screening
-
DOI 10.1002/pd.358
-
De Graaf IM, Tijmstra T, Bleker OP, van Lith JMM. 2002. Women's preference in Down syndrome screening. Prenat Diagn 22: 624-629. (Pubitemid 34839304)
-
(2002)
Prenatal Diagnosis
, vol.22
, Issue.7
, pp. 624-629
-
-
De Graaf, I.M.1
Tijmstra, T.2
Bleker, O.P.3
Van Lith, J.M.M.4
-
5
-
-
9644272524
-
Uptake of a prenatal screening test: The role of healthcare professionals' attitudes towards the test
-
DOI 10.1002/pd.1028
-
Dormandy E, Marteau TM. 2004. Uptake of a prenatal screening test: the role of healthcare professionals' attitudes towards the test. Prenat Diagn 24: 864-868. (Pubitemid 39576799)
-
(2004)
Prenatal Diagnosis
, vol.24
, Issue.11
, pp. 864-868
-
-
Dormandy, E.1
Marteau, T.M.2
-
6
-
-
18444394349
-
Options for Down syndrome screening: What will women choose?
-
Grant SS. 2005. Options for Down syndrome screening: what will women choose? J Midwifery Womens Health 50: 211-218.
-
(2005)
J Midwifery Womens Health
, vol.50
, pp. 211-218
-
-
Grant, S.S.1
-
7
-
-
0036023291
-
Comparison and integration of first trimester fetal nuchal translucency and second trimester maternal serum screening for fetal Down syndrome
-
DOI 10.1002/pd.382
-
Lam YH, Lee CP, Sin SY, et al. 2002. Comparison and integration of first trimester fetal nuchal translucency and second trimester maternal serum screening for fetal Down syndrome. Prenat Diagn 22: 730-735. (Pubitemid 34857421)
-
(2002)
Prenatal Diagnosis
, vol.22
, Issue.8
, pp. 730-735
-
-
Lam, Y.H.1
Lee, C.P.2
Sin, S.Y.3
Tang, R.4
Wong, H.S.5
Wong, S.F.6
Fong, D.Y.T.7
Tang, M.H.Y.8
Woo, H.H.N.9
-
8
-
-
31944435047
-
A comparison of Australian and UK obstetricians' and midwives' preferences for screening tests for Down syndrome
-
Lewis SM, Cullinane FN, Bishop AJ, Chitty LS, Marteau TM, Halliday JL. 2006a. A comparison of Australian and UK obstetricians' and midwives' preferences for screening tests for Down syndrome. Prenat Diagn 26: 60-66.
-
(2006)
Prenat Diagn
, vol.26
, pp. 60-66
-
-
Lewis, S.M.1
Cullinane, F.N.2
Bishop, A.J.3
Chitty, L.S.4
Marteau, T.M.5
Halliday, J.L.6
-
9
-
-
33745948154
-
Women's and health professionals' preferences for prenatal testing for Down syndrome in Australia
-
Lewis SM, Cullinane FN, Carlin JB, Halliday JL. 2006b. Women's and health professionals' preferences for prenatal testing for Down syndrome in Australia. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 46: 205-211.
-
(2006)
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol
, vol.46
, pp. 205-211
-
-
Lewis, S.M.1
Cullinane, F.N.2
Carlin, J.B.3
Halliday, J.L.4
-
10
-
-
27744477773
-
First-trimester or second-trimester screening, or both, for down's syndrome
-
DOI 10.1056/NEJMoa043693
-
Malone FD, Canick JA, Ball RH, et al. 2005. First-trimester or second-trimester screening, or both, for Down's syndrome. N Engl J Med 353: 2001-2011. (Pubitemid 41609093)
-
(2005)
New England Journal of Medicine
, vol.353
, Issue.19
, pp. 2001-2011
-
-
Malone, F.D.1
Canick, J.A.2
Ball, R.H.3
Nyberg, D.A.4
Comstock, C.H.5
Bukowski, R.6
Berkowitz, R.L.7
Gross, S.J.8
Dugoff, L.9
Craigo, S.D.10
Timor-Tritsch, I.E.11
Carr, S.R.12
Wolfe, H.M.13
Dukes, K.14
Bianchi, D.W.15
Rudnicka, A.R.16
Hackshaw, A.K.17
Lambert-Messerlian, G.18
Wald, N.J.19
D'Alton, M.E.20
more..
-
11
-
-
0033795010
-
Women's knowledge of and attitudes to first and second trimester screening for Down's syndrome
-
Mulvey S, Wallace EM. 2000. Women's knowledge of and attitubes to first and second trimester screening for Down's syndrome. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 107: 1302-1305. (Pubitemid 30736202)
-
(2000)
British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
, vol.107
, Issue.10
, pp. 1302-1305
-
-
Mulvey, S.1
Wallace, E.M.2
-
12
-
-
0142073800
-
Do women prefer to have screening tests for Down syndrome that have the lowest screen-positive rate or the highest detection rate?
-
DOI 10.1002/pd.701
-
Mulvey S, Zachariah R, Mcilwaine K, Wallace M. 2003. Do women prefer to have screening tests for Down syndrome that have the lowest screen-positive rate or the highest detection rate?. Prenat Diagn 23: 828-832. (Pubitemid 37279869)
-
(2003)
Prenatal Diagnosis
, vol.23
, Issue.10
, pp. 828-832
-
-
Mulvey, S.1
Zachariah, R.2
McIlwaine, K.3
Wallace, E.M.4
-
13
-
-
0033811147
-
Participation in maternal serum screening for Down syndrome, neural tube defects, and trisomy 18 following screen-positive results in a previous pregnancy
-
Rausch DN, Lambert-Messerlian GM, Canick JA. 2000. Participation in maternal serum screening for Down syndrome, neural tube defects, and trisomy 18 following screen-positive results in a previous pregnancy. West J Med 173: 180-183.
-
(2000)
West J Med
, vol.173
, pp. 180-183
-
-
Rausch, D.N.1
Lambert-Messerlian, G.M.2
Canick, J.A.3
-
15
-
-
41649119230
-
Current methods of prenatal screening for Down screening for Down syndrome and other fetal abnormalities
-
Saller DN, Canick JA. 2008. Current methods of prenatal screening for Down screening for Down syndrome and other fetal abnormalities. Clin Obstet Gynecol 51: 24-36.
-
(2008)
Clin Obstet Gynecol
, vol.51
, pp. 24-36
-
-
Saller, D.N.1
Canick, J.A.2
-
16
-
-
25844459022
-
Patient preference regarding first-trimester aneuploidy risk assessment
-
DOI 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.03.064, PII S0002937805004990
-
Sharma G, Gold HT, Chervenak FA, McCullough L, Alt AK, Chasen ST. 2005. Patient preference regarding first-trimester aneuploidy risk assessment. Am J Obstet Gynecol 193: 1429-1436. (Pubitemid 41395115)
-
(2005)
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
, vol.193
, Issue.4
, pp. 1429-1436
-
-
Sharma, G.1
Gold, H.T.2
Chervenak, F.A.3
McCullough, L.4
Alt, A.K.5
Chasen, S.T.6
-
17
-
-
0036932954
-
Uptake of prenatal screening for chromosomal anomalies: Impact of test results in a previous pregnancy
-
DOI 10.1002/pd.504
-
Spencer K. 2002. Uptake of prenatal screening for chromosomal anomalies: impact of test results in a previous pregnancy. Prenat Diagn 22: 1229-1232. (Pubitemid 36043175)
-
(2002)
Prenatal Diagnosis
, vol.22
, Issue.13
, pp. 1229-1232
-
-
Spencer, K.1
-
18
-
-
10644241716
-
Factors affecting women's preference for type of prenatal screening test for chromosomal anomalies
-
DOI 10.1002/uog.1768
-
Spencer K, Aitken D. 2004. Factors affecting women's preference for type of prenatal screening test for chromosomal anomalies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 24: 735-739. (Pubitemid 39657876)
-
(2004)
Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
, vol.24
, Issue.7
, pp. 735-739
-
-
Spencer, K.1
Aitken, D.2
-
19
-
-
0037333249
-
Screening for chromosomal abnormalities in the first trimester using ultrasound and maternal serum biochemistry in a one-stop clinic: A review of three years prospective experience
-
DOI 10.1046/j.1471-0528.2003.02246.x
-
Spencer K, Spencer CE, Power M, Dawson C, Nicholaides KH. 2003. Screening for chromosomal abnormalities in the first trimester using ultrasound and maternal serum biochemistry in a one-stop clinic: a review of three years prospective experience. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 110: 281-286. (Pubitemid 36298912)
-
(2003)
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
, vol.110
, Issue.3
, pp. 281-286
-
-
Spencer, K.1
Spencer, C.E.2
Power, M.3
Dawson, C.4
Nicolaides, K.H.5
-
20
-
-
0037704145
-
First and second trimester antenatal screening for Down's syndrome: The results of the Serum, Urine and Ultrasound Screening Study (SURUSS)
-
DOI 10.1258/096914103321824133
-
Wald NJ, Rodeck C, Hackshaw AK, et al. 2003. First and second trimester antenatal screening for Down's syndrome: the results of the Serum, Urine and Ultrasound Screening Study (SURUSS). J Med Screen 10: 56-104. (Pubitemid 36734906)
-
(2003)
Journal of Medical Screening
, vol.10
, Issue.2
, pp. 56-104
-
-
Wald, N.J.1
Rodeck, C.2
Hackshaw, A.K.3
Walters, J.4
Chitty, L.5
Mackinson, A.M.6
|