Comparative analysis of some modal reconstruction methods of the shape of the cornea from corneal elevation data

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 50, Issue 12, 2009, Pages 5639-5645

  Martinez Finkelshtein, Andrei ^a,b   Delgado, Antonia M ^c   Castro, Gracia M ^d   Zarzo, Alejandro ^b,e   Alio, Jorge L ^d,f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALMERÍA   (Spain)

^b Institute Carlos I of Theoretical and Computational Physics   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

^d VISSUM Corporacion Oftalmologica   (Spain)

^e UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID   (Spain)

^f MIGUEL HERNÁNDEZ UNIVERSITY   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; CONSTANTS AND COEFFICIENTS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA; CORNEA SHAPE; ERROR; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MEAN SQUARE ERROR; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURFACE PROPERTY; ZERNIKE COEFFICIENT; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; KERATOMETRY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL;

CORNEA; CORNEAL TOPOGRAPHY; HUMANS; LEAST-SQUARES ANALYSIS; MODELS, ANATOMIC; MODELS, STATISTICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 73349141721     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: 15525783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.08-3351     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Klyce SD, Karon MD, Smolek MK. Advantages and disadvantages of the Zernike expansion for representing wave aberration of the normal and aberrated eye. J Refract Surg.2004;20:537-541.
2. Smolek MK, Klyce SD. Zernike polynomial fitting fails to represent all visually significant corneal aberrations. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44(11):4676-4681.
3. Carvalho LA. Accuracy of zernike polynomials in characterizing optical aberrations and the corneal surface of the eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:1915-1926.
4. Carvalho LA. Preliminary results of neural networks and Zernike polynomials for classification of videokeratography maps. Optom Vis Sci. 2005;82:151-158.
5. Schwiegerling JT, Greivenkamp JE. Keratoconus detection based on videokeratoscopic height data. Optom Vis Sci. 1989;73:721-728.
6. Artal P, Berrio E, Guirao A, Piers P. Contribution of the cornea and internal surfaces to the change of ocular aberrations with age. J Opt Soc Am A. 2002;19:137-143.
7. Smolek MK, Klyce SD. Goodness-of-prediction of Zernike polynomial fitting to corneal surfaces. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31: 2350-2355.
8. Iskander R, Collins MJ, Davis B. Optimal modeling of corneal surfaces with Zernike polynomials. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2001; 48(1):87-95.
9. Ares M, Royo S. Comparison of cubic B-spline and Zernike-fitting techniques in complex wavefront reconstruction. Appl Opt. 2006; 45:6945-6964.
10. Thibos L, Applegate RA, Schwiegerling JT, Webb R. Standards for reporting the optical aberrations of eyes. Vision Science and its Applications, OSA Technical Digest. Washington, DC: Optical Society of America; 2000;paper SuC1.
11. Rozema JJ, Van Dyck DEM, Tassignon M-J. Clinical comparison of 6 aberrometers. Part 1: technical specifications. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:1114-1127.
12. Bhatia AB, Wolf E. On the circle polynomials of Zernike and related orthogonal sets. Proc Cambridge Philos Soc. 1954;50:40-53.
13. Iskander R, Morelande MR, Collins MJ, Davis B. Modeling of cor-neal surfaces with radial polynomials. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2002;49(4):320-328.
14. Myrick DR. A generalization of the radial polynomials of F. Zernike. SIAM J Appl Math. 1966;14(3):476-489.
15. Xu Y. A family of Sobolev orthogonal polynomials on the unit ball. J Approx Theory. 2006;138:232-241.
16. Xu Y. Sobolev orthogonal polynomials defined via gradient on the unit ball. J Approx Theory. 2008;152:52-65.
17. Roddier F, Roddier C. Wavefront reconstruction using iterative Fourier transform. Appl Opt. 1991;30:501-503.
18. Dai G, Comparison of wavefront reconstruction with Zernike polynomials and Fourier coefficients. J Refract Surg. 2006;22(11):943-948.
19. Wang L, Chernyak D, Yeh D, Koch DD. Fitting behavior of Fourier transform and Zernike polynomials. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007; 33:999-1004.
20. Yoon G, Pantanelli S, MacRae S. Comparison of Zernike and Fourier wavefront reconstruction algorithms in representing corneal aberration of normal and abnormal eyes. J Refractive Surg. 2008; 24:582-590.
21. Dai G. Wavefront Reconstruction Methods (Letter and Reply). J Refract Surg. 2009;25:9-11.
22. Wendland H. Scattered Data Approximation. Vol. 17. Cambridge Monographs on Applied and Computational Mathematics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2005.
23. Buhmann MD. Radial Basis Functions: Theory and Implementations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2003.
24. Montoya-Hernández M, Servín M, Malacara-Hernández D, Paez G. Wavefront fitting using Gaussian functions. Opt Commun. 1999;163:259-269.
25. Trefethen LN, Bau D. Numerical Linear Algebra. Philadelphia: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM); 1997.
26. Alonso-Caneiro D, Iskander R, Collins MJ. Estimating corneal surface topography in videokeratoscopy in the presence of strong signal interference. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2008;55(10):2381-2387.
27. Alió JL, Shabayek MH. Corneal higher order aberrations: a method to grade keratoconus. J Refract Surg. 2006;22:539-545.