Application and evaluation of three methodologies for plantwide control of the styrene monomer plant

Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research

Volumn 48, Issue 24, 2009, Pages 10941-10961

  Vasudevan, Suraj ^a   Rangaiah, G P ^a   Konda, N V S N Murthy ^a   Tay, Wee Hwa ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BASIC IDEA; CHEMICAL PROCESS; COMPLEX INDUSTRIAL PROCESS; COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS; ENERGY INTEGRATION; FLOWSHEET; HYDRODEALKYLATION; INTEGRATED FRAMEWORKS; MATERIAL RECYCLE; NEW YORK; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; PLANT OPERATIONS; PLANTWIDE CONTROL; PROCESS SIMULATORS; PRODUCT QUALITY CONTROL; RELATIVE PERFORMANCE; SELF-OPTIMIZING CONTROL; SIMULATION MODEL; STABLE CONTROL; STYRENE MONOMER; STYRENE PLANTS; SYSTEM DESIGN METHOD;

CONTROL SYSTEM ANALYSIS; CUSTOMER SATISFACTION; HEURISTIC METHODS; ROBUST CONTROL; STYRENE; TOLUENE; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT;

PROCESS CONTROL;

EID: 73349132966     PISSN: 08885885     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ie900022h     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Konda, N. V. S. N. M.; Rangaiah, G. P.; Krishnaswamy, P. R. Plant-Wide Control of Industrial Processes: An Integrated Framework of Simulation and Heuristics. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2005, 44, 8300-8313.
2. Luyben, W. L.; Tyreus, B. D.; Luyben, M. L. Plant-Wide Process Control; McGraw-Hill: New York, 1998.
3. Skogestad, S. Control Structure Design for Complete Chemical Plants. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2004, 28, 219-234.
4. Buckley, P. S. Techniques of Process Control; Wiley: New York, 1964.
5. Larsson, T.; Skogestad, S. Plant-Wide Control-A Review and a New Design Procedure. Model., Ident. Control 2000, 21 (4), 209-240.
6. Konda, N. V. S. N. M.; Rangaiah, G. P.; Krishnaswamy, P. R. Systematic Classification of Plant-Wide Control System Design Procedures with Application to the HDA Process. Presented at AIChE Annual Meeting, San Fransisco, Nov 2003.
7. Skogestad, S. Plant-Wide Control: The Search for the Self-Optimizing Control Structure. J. Process Control 2000, 10, 487-507.
8. Skogestad, S. Self-Optimizing Control: The Missing Link Between Steady-State Optimization and Control. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2000, 24, 569-575.
9. Jorgensen, J. B.; Jorgensen, S. B. Towards Automatic Decentralized Control Structure Selection. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2000, 24, 841-846.
10. Zhu, G. Y.; Henson, M. A.; Ogunnaike, B. A. A Hybrid Model Predictive Control Strategy for Non-Linear Plant-Wide Control. J. Process Control 2000, 10, 449-458.
11. Groenendijk, A. J.; Dimian, A. C.; Iedema, P. D. Systems Approach for Evaluating Dynamics and Plant-Wide Control of Complex Plants. AIChE J. 2000, 46, 133-145.
12. Dimian, A. C.; Groenendijk, A. J.; Iedema, P. D. Recycle Interaction Effects on the Control of Impurities in a Complex Plant. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2001, 40, 5784-5794.
13. Robinson, D.; Chen, R.; McAvoy, T.; Schnelle, P. D. An Optimal Control Based Approach to Designing Plant-Wide Control System Architectures. J. Process Control. 2001, 11, 223-236.
14. Kookos, I. K.; Perkins, J. D. Heuristic-Based Mathematical Programming Framework for Control Structure Selection. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2001, 40, 2079-2088.
15. Wang, P.; McAvoy, T. Synthesis of Plant-Wide Control Systems Using a Dynamic Model and Optimization. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2001, 40, 5732-5742.
16. Chen, R.; McAvoy, T. Plant-Wide Control System Design: Methodology and Application to a Vinyl Acetate Process. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2003, 42, 4753-4771.
17. Chen, R.; McAvoy, T.; Zafiriou, E. Plant-Wide Control System Design: Extension to Multiple-Forcing and Multiple-Steady-State Operation. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2004, 43, 3685-3694.
18. Vasbinder, E. M.; Hoo, K. A. Decision-Based Approach to Plant-Wide Control Structure Synthesis. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2003, 42, 4586-4598.
19. Cao, Y.; Saha, P. Improved Branch and Bound Method for Control Structure Screening. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2005, 60, 1555-1564.
20. Cao, Y.; Kariwala, V. Bidirectional Branch and Bound for Controlled Variable Selection. Part 1. Principles and Minimum Singular Value Criterion. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2008, 32, 2306-2319.
21. Baldea, M.; Araujo, A.; Skogestad, S.; Daoutidis, P. Dynamic Considerations in the Synthesis of Self-Optimizing Control Structures. AIChE J. 2008, 54, 1830-1841.
22. Downs, J. J.; Vogel, E. F. A Plant-Wide Industrial Process Control Problem. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1993, 17, 245-255.
23. McAvoy, T. J.; Ye, N. Base Control for the Tennessee Eastman Problem. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1994, 18, 383-413.
24. Price, R. M.; Lyman, P. R.; Georgakis, C. Throughput Manipulation in Plant-Wide Control Structures. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1994, 33, 1197-1207.
25. Lyman, P. R.; Georgakis, C. Plant-Wide Control of the Tennessee Eastman Problem. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1995, 19, 321-331.
26. Ye, N.; McAvoy, T. J.; Kosanovich, K. A.; Piovoso, M. J. Optimal Averaging Level Control for the Tennessee Eastman Problem. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 1995, 73, 234-240.
27. Ricker, N. L.; Lee, J. H. Non-Linear Model-Predictive Control of the Tennessee Eastman Challenge Process. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1995, 19, 961-981.
28. Banerjee, A.; Arkun, Y. Control Configuration Design Applied to the Tennessee Eastman Plant-Wide Control Problem. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1995, 19, 453-480.
29. McAvoy, T. J.; Ye, N.; Gang, C. Nonlinear Inferential Parallel Cascade Control. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1996, 35, 130-137.
30. Ricker, N. L. Decentralized Control of The Tennessee Eastman Challenge Problem. J. Process Control 1996, 6, 205-221.
31. Luyben, M. L.; Tyreus, B. D.; Luyben, W. L. Plant-Wide Control Design Procedure. AIChE J. 1997, 43, 3161-3174.
32. McAvoy, T. J. Synthesis of Plant-Wide Control Systems Using Optimization. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1999, 38, 2984-2994.
33. Tian, Z. H.; Hoo, K. A. Multiple Model-Based Control of the Tennessee Eastman Process. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2005, 44, 3187-3202.
34. Stephanopoulos, G. Chemical Process Control; Prentice Hall: New Jersey, 1984.
35. Ponton, J. W.; Laing, D. M. A Hierarchical Approach to the Design of Process Control Systems. Trans. Inst. Chem. Eng. 1993, 71, 181-188.
36. Fonyo, Z. Design Modifications and Proper Plant-Wide Control. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1994, 18, S483-S492.
37. Ng, C. S.; Stephanopoulos, G. Synthesis of Control Systems for Chemical Plants. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1996, 20, S999-S1004.
38. Cao, Y.; Rossister, D. An Input Pre-Screening Technique for Control Structure Selection. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1997, 21, 563-569.
39. Luyben, W. L. Plant-Wide Dynamic Simulators in Chemical Processing and Control; Marcel Dekker: New York, 2002.
40. Herrmann, G.; Spurgeon, S. K.; Edwards, C. A Model-Based Sliding Mode Control Methodology Applied to the HDA Plant. J. Process Control 2003, 13, 129-138.
41. Qiu, Q. F.; Rangaiah, G. P.; Krishnaswamy, P. R. Application of a Plant-Wide Control Design to the HDA Process. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2003, 27, 73-94.
42. Bildea, C. S.; Dimian, A. C. Fixing Flow Rates in Recycle Systems: Luyben's Rule Revisited. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2003, 42, 4578-4585.
43. Vasbinder, E. M.; Hoo, K. A.; Mann, U. Synthesis of Plant-Wide Control Structures using a Decision-Based Methodology. In The Integration of Process Design and Control; Seferlis, P., Georgiadis, M. C., Eds.; Elsevier: New York, 2004; pp 375-400.
44. Konda, N. V. S. N. M.; Rangaiah, G. P.; Lim, D. K. H. Optimal Process Design and Effective Plant-Wide Control of Industrial Processes by a Simulation-Based Heuristic Approach. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2006, 45, 5955-5970.
45. Araujo, A. C. B.; Govatsmark, M.; Skogestad, S. Application of Plant-Wide Control to the HDA Process. I-Steady-State Optimization and Self-Optimizing Control. Control Eng. Pract. 2007, 15, 1222-1237.
46. Araujo, A. C. B.; Hori, E. S.; Skogestad, S. Application of Plant-Wide Control to the HDA Process. II-Regulatory Control. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2007, 46, 5159-5174.
47. Bouton, G. R.; Luyben, W. L. Optimum Economic Design and Control of a Gas Permeation Membrane Coupled with the HDA Process. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2008, 47, 1221-1237.
48. Olsen, D. G.; Svrcek, W. Y.; Young, B. R. Plant-Wide Control Study of a Vinyl Acetate Monomer Process Design. Chem. Eng. Commun. 2005, 192, 1243-1257.
49. Turkay, M.; Gurkan, T.; Ozgen, C. Synthesis of Regulatory Control Structures for a Styrene Plant. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1993, 17, 601-608.
50. Zhu, G. Y.; Henson, M. A. Model Predictive Control of Interconnected Linear and Non-Linear Processes. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2002, 41, 801-816.
51. Al-Arfaj, M. A.; Luyben, W. L. Plant-Wide Control for TAME Production Using Reactive Distillation. AIChE J. 2004, 50, 1462-1473.
52. Tarafder, A.; Rangaiah, G. P.; Ray, A. K. Multi-objective Optimization of an Industrial Styrene Monomer Manufacturing Process. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2005, 60, 347-363.
53. Konda, N. V. S. N. M.; Rangaiah, G. P. Performance Assessment of Plant-Wide Control Systems of Industrial Processes. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2007, 46, 1220-1231.
54. Araujo, A. C. B.; Skogestad, S. Control Structure Design for the Ammonia Synthesis Process. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2008, 32, 2920-2932.
55. Meili, A. Optimize Styrene Distillation. Hydrocarbon Process. 1998, 77 (12), 85-89.
56. Denis, H. J.; Castor, W. M. Styrene. In Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry, A25; Elvers, B., Hawkin, S., Russey, W., Eds.; John Wiley and Sons: New York, 1992; pp 325-335.
57. Woodle, G. B. Styrene. In Encyclopedia of Chemical Processing; Lee, S., Eds.; Taylor and Francis: New York, 2006; 2859-2869.
58. Sheel, J. C. P.; Crowe, C. M. Simulation and Optimization of an Existing Ethyl Benzene Dehydrogenation Reactor. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 1969, 47, 183-187.
59. Elnashaie, S. S. E. H.; Elshishini, S. S. Modelling, Simulation and Optimization of Industrial Fixed Bed Catalytic Reactors. In Topics in Chemical Engineering; Gordon and Breach Science Publishers: New York, 1993; Vol. 7.
60. Lee, C. H.; Hubbell, O. S. Styrene. In Encyclopedia of Chemical Processing and Design; McKetta, J., Weismantel, G. E., Eds.; Wiley: New York, 1982; Vol. 55, pp 197-217.
61. Konda, N. V. S. N. M.; Rangaiah, G. P.; Krishnaswamy, P. R. A Simple and Effective Procedure for Control Degrees of Freedom. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2006, 61, 1184-1194.
62. Vasudevan, S.; Konda, N. V. S. N. M.; Rangaiah, G. P. Control Degrees of Freedom Using the Restraining Number: Further Evaluation. Asia-Pacific J. Chem. Eng. 2008, 3, 638-647.
63. Svrcek, W. Y.; Mahoney, D. P.; Young, B. R. A Real-Time Approach to Process Control; John Wiley and Sons: New York, 2000.
64. Fruehauf, P. S.; Mahoney, D. P. Distillation Column Control Design Using Steady-State Models: Usefulness and Limitations. ISA Trans. 1993, 32 (2), 157-175.
65. Turton, R.; Bailie, R. C.; Whiting, W. B.; Shaeiwitz, J. A. Analysis, Synthesis, and Design of Chemical Processes; Prentice Hall: New Jersey, 2003.
66. Riggs, J. B. Improve Distillation Column Control. Chem. Eng. Prog. 1998, 94 (10), 31-47.
67. Larsson, T.; Govatsmark, M. S.; Skogestad, S.; Yu, C. C. Control Structure Selection for Reactor, Separator, and Recycle Processes. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2003, 42, 1225-1234.