Improved branch and bound method for control structure screening

Chemical Engineering Science

Volumn 60, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 1555-1564

  Cao, Yi ^a   Saha, Prabirkumar ^a,b  

^a CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY GUWAHATI   (India)

Author keywords

Branch and bound method; Control structure screening; Hankel singular value; Optimization; Process control; Stability; Systems engineering; Tennessee Eastman process

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; CONTROL EQUIPMENT; STABILIZATION;

COMPLEXITY; CONTROL STRUCTURES; DEPTH-FIRST SEARCH APPROACHES; TENNESSEE-EASTMAN PROCESS;

SCREENING;

CONTROL SYSTEM; MODEL; PROCESS CONTROL; STABILITY;

EID: 13444259335     PISSN: 00092509     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2004.10.025     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Braatz, R., Lee, J., Morari, M., 1996. Screening plant designs and control structures for uncertain systems. Computers & Chemical Engineering 20 (4), 463-468.
2. Cao, Y., Saha, P., Jun 2003. Control structure selection for unstable processes using Hankel singular value. In: 13th European Symposium on Computer Aided Process Engineering (ESCAPE-13). Elsevier Science, Lappeenranta, Finland, pp. 383-388.
3. Cao, Y., Biss, D., Perkins, J.D., 1996. Comparison of two techniques for assessing input-output controllability in the presence of manipulated variable constraints. Computers & Chemical Engineering 20 (4), 337-346.
4. Cao, Y., Rossiter, D., Owens, D.H., 1998. Globally optimal control structure selection using branch and bound method. In: Preprints of DYCOPS'5. Corfu, Greece, pp. 183-188.
5. Chen, X., 2003. An improved branch and bound algorithm for feature selection. Pattern Recognition Letters 24, 1925-1933.
6. Downs, J.J., Vogel, E.F., 1993. A plant-wide industrial process control problem. Computers & Chemical Engineering 17 (3), 245-255.
7. Glover, K., 1986. Robust stabilization of linear-multivariable systems - relations to approximation. International Journal of Control 43, 741-766.
8. Gutierrez, R., Sahinidis, N., 1996. A branch-and-bound approach for machine screening in just-in-time manufacturing systems. International Journal of Production Research 34 (3), 797-818.
9. Havre, K., Skogestad, S., 1996. Input-output selection and partial control. In: Proceedings of IFAC'96 13th World Congress, vol. M. San Francisco, CA, USA, pp. 181-186.
10. Havre, K., Skogestad, K., 1998. Selection of variables for regulatory control using pole vectors. In: Preprints of DYCOPS'5. Corfu, Greece, pp. 614-619.
11. Havre, K., Skogestad, S., 2003. Screening of variables for stabilizing control using pole vectors. IEEE Transaction on Automatic Control 48 (8), 1393-1398.
12. Heath, J., Kookos, I., Perkins, J., 2000. Process control structure selection based on economics. A.I.Ch.E Journal 46 (10), 1998-2016.
13. Kookos, I., Perkins, J., 2001. An algorithm for simultaneous process design and control. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research 40, 4079-4088.
14. Luyben, M., Floudas, C., 1994a. Analyzing the interaction of design and control. 1. A multiobjective framework and application to binary distillation synthesis. Computers & Chemical Engineering 18 (10), 933-969.
15. Luyben, M., Floudas, C. 1994b. Analyzing the interaction of design and control. 2. Reactor separator recycle system. Computers & Chemical Engineering 18 (10), 971-994.
16. McAvoy, T., 1998. A methodology for screening level control structures in plantwide control systems. Computers & Chemical Engineering 22 (11), 1543-1552.
17. Narendra, P.M., Fukunaga, K., 1977. A branch and bound algorithm for feature subset selection. IEEE Transaction on Computers C-26 (9), 917-922.
18. Raman, R., Grossmann, I., 1991. Relation between MINLP modelling and logical interface for chemical process synthesis. Computers & Chemical Engineering 15 (2), 73-84.
19. Ricker, N., 2002. New simulink models of two decentralized control strategies. Tennessee Eastman Challenge Archive, http://depts. washington.edu/control/LARRY/TE/download.html.
20. Ridout, M.S., 1988. An improved branch and bound algorithm for feature subset selection. Applied Statistics 37, 139-147.
21. Roberts, S.J., 1984. A branch and bound algorithm for determining the optimal feature subset of given size. Applied Statistics 33, 236-241.
22. Ryoo, H., Sahinidis, N., 1996. A branch-and-bound approach to global optimization. Journal of Global Optimization 8 (2), 107-139.
23. Safanov, M., Jonckheere, E., Verma, M., Limebeer, D., 1987. Synthesis of positive real multivariable feedback systems. International Journal of Control 45 (3), 817-842.
24. Skogestad, S., Postlethwaite, I., 1996. Multivariable Feedback Control. Analysis and Design, Wiley, Chichester.
25. Skrifvars, H., Harjunkoski, I., Westerlund, T., Kravanja, Z., Pörn, R., 1996. Comparison of different MINLP methods applied on certain chemical engineering problems. Computers & Chemical Engineering 20, S333-S338.
26. Wilkinson, J., 1965. The Algebraic Eigenvalue Problem, Claredon Press, Oxford, England.
27. Yu, B., Yuan, B., 1992. A dynamic selection algorithm for globally optimal subsets. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 5 (5), 457-462.
28. Yu, B., Yuan, B., 1993. A more efficient branch and bound algorithm for feature selection. Pattern Recognition 26 (6), 883-889.