Feasibility and reliability of PRISMA-Medical for specialty-based incident analysis

Quality and Safety in Health Care

Volumn 18, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 486-491

  Snijders, Cathelijne ^a,b   Van Der Schaaf, T W ^c,d   Klip, H ^a   Van Lingen, R A ^e   Fetter, W P F ^e   Molendijk, A ^a  

^a ISALA HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^b JULIANA CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^c HASSELT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^d EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^e VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; FEASIBILITY STUDY; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; NEWBORN INTENSIVE CARE; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT SAFETY; PREVENTION RECOVERY INFORMATION SYSTEM FOR MONITORING AND ANALYSIS; RELIABILITY; TERTIARY HEALTH CARE;

FEASIBILITY STUDIES; HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS; HUMANS; INTENSIVE CARE UNITS, NEONATAL; MEDICAL ERRORS; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RISK MANAGEMENT;

EID: 73349127121     PISSN: 14753898     EISSN: 14753901     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/qshc.2008.028068     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Reason J. Human error: models and management. BMJ 2000;320:768-70.
2. Barach P, Small SD. Reporting and preventing medical mishaps: lessons from non-medical near miss reporting systems. BMJ 2000;320:759-63.
3. Brennan TA, Leape LL, Laird NM, et al. Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study I. N Engl J Med 1991;324:370-6.
4. Leape LL, Brennan TA, Laird N, et al. The nature of adverse events in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study II. N Engl J Med 1991;324:377-84.
5. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS. To err is human. Building a safer health system. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2000.
6. Aspden PH, Corrigan JM, Wolcott J. Patient safety: achieving a new standard for care. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2004.
7. Kaplan HS, Rabin Fastman B. Organization of event reporting data for sense making and system improvement. Qual Saf Health Care 2003;12(Suppl 2):ii68-72.
8. Van der Schaaf TW. Near miss reporting in the chemical process industry [thesis]. Eindhoven, The Netherlands: Eindhoven University of Technology, 1992.
9. Leape LL. Reporting of adverse events. N Engl J Med 2002;347:1633-8.
10. Snijders C, van Lingen RA, Molendijk A, et al. Incidents and errors in neonatal intensive care: a review of the literature. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2007;92:391-8.
11. Suresh G, Horbar JD, Plsek P, et al. Voluntary anonymous reporting of medical errors for neonatal intensive care. Pediatrics 2004;113:1609-18.
12. Battles JB, Kaplan HS, Van der Schaaf TW, et al. The attributes of medical event-reporting systems. Experience with a prototype medical event-reporting system for transfusion medicine. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1998;122:231-8.
13. Van Vuuren W. Organisational failure: an exploratory study in the steel industry and the medical domain [thesis]. Eindhoven, The Netherlands: Eindhoven University of Technology, 1998.
14. Wright L, Van der Schaaf TW. Accident versus near miss causation: a critical review of the literature, an empirical test in the UK railway domain, and their implications for other sectors. J Hazard Mater 2004;111:105-10.
15. Vincent CA. Analysis of clinical incidents: a window on the system not a search for root causes. Qual Saf Health Care 2004;13:242-3.
16. Van der Schaaf TW, Habraken MMP. PRISMA-Medical: a brief description. Eindhoven, The Netherlands: Eindhoven University of Technology, 2005. Available at: http://www.who-icps.org/resources/PRISMA-Medical.pdf (accessed 25 February 2008).
17. Kaplan HS, Battles JB, Van der Schaaf TW, et al. Identification and classification of the causes of events in transfusion medicine. Transfusion 1998;38:1071-81.
18. Rasmussen J. The definition of human error and a taxonomy for technical systems design. In: Rasmussen J, Duncan K, Leplat J, eds. New technology and human error. London: Wiley, 1987:23-30.
19. Beckmann U, Baldwin I, Hart GK, et al. The Australian Incident Monitoring Study in Intensive Care: AIMS-ICU. An analysis of the first year of reporting. Anaesth Intensive Care 1996;24:320-9.
20. Frey B, Kehrer B, Losa M, et al. Comprehensive critical incident monitoring in a neonatal-pediatric intensive care unit: experience with the system approach. Intensive Care Med 2000;26:69-74.
21. Kaushal R, Bates DW, Landrigan C, et al. Medication errors and adverse drug events in pediatric inpatients. JAMA 2001;285:2114-20.
22. Shoukri MM. Measures of interobserver agreement. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC, 2004:39-57.
23. Fleiss JL. Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychol Bull 1971;76:378-82.
24. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159-74.
25. Habraken MMP. [Better analysis of incidents: PRISMA-method improves Inspectorate's knowledge of medical mishaps]. Med Contact (Bussum) 2005;22:940-3 (in Dutch).
26. Wijers H. Reporting of deviations [MSc thesis]. Eindhoven, The Netherlands: Eindhoven University of Technology (in Dutch).