Patients' pretreatment beliefs about recovery influence outcome of a pain rehabilitation program

European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine

Volumn 45, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 391-401

  Merrick, D ^a,b   Sjolund B H ^a,c  

^a Rehabiliterings og Forskningscentret for Torturofre   (Denmark)

^b UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN DENMARK   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Disability evaluation; Health care; Pain; Pain measurement; Patient satisfaction; Quality assurance; Treatment outcome

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CHRONIC DISEASE; COGNITIVE THERAPY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DISABILITY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PAIN; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUALITY OF LIFE; SICKNESS IMPACT PROFILE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADULT; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CHRONIC DISEASE; COGNITIVE THERAPY; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; PAIN; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; QUALITY OF LIFE; SICKNESS IMPACT PROFILE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 73349123766     PISSN: 19739087     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Verhaak PF, Kerssens JJ, Dekker J, Sorbi MJ, Bensing JM. Prevalence of chronic benign pain disorder among adults: a review of the literature. Pain 1998;77:231-9.
2. Breivik H, Collett B, Ventafridda V, Cohen R, Gallacher D. Survey of chronic pain in Europe: prevalence, impact on daily life, and treatment. Eur J Pain 2006;10:287-333.
3. Thomas E, Silman AJ, Croft PR, Papageorgiou AC, Jayson MI, Macfarlane GJ. Predicting who develops chronic low back pain in primary care: a prospective study. BMJ 1999;318:1662-7.
4. Linton SJ, Hellsing AL, Hallden K. A population-based study of spinal pain among 35-45 year old individuals. Prevalence, sick leave, and health care use. Spine 1998;23:1457-63.
5. Fordyce WE. Behavioral methods for chronic pain and illness. St Louis, MO: Mosby; 1976. p. 236
6. Rudy TE, Kerns RD, Turk DC. Chronic pain and depression: toward a cognitive-behavioral mediation model. Pain 1988;35:129-40.
7. Turk DC, Okifuji AD. A cognitive behavioral approach to pain management. In: Wall PD, Melzack R, editors. Textbook of pain. London: Churchill Livingstone; 1999. p. 1431-4.
8. Turner JA, Romano JM. Cognitive-behavioral therapy for chronic pain. In: Loeser JD, editor. Bonica's management of pain. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001. p. 1751-8.
9. Flor H, Fydrich T, Turk DC. Efficacy of multidisciplinary pain treatment centers: a meta-analytic review. Pain 1992;49:221-30.
10. Morley S, Eccleston C, Williams A. Systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials of cognitive behaviour therapy and behaviour therapy for chronic pain in adults, excluding headache. Pain 1999;80:1-13.
11. Guzman J, Esmail R, Karjalainen K, Malmivaara A, Irvin E, Bombardier C. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for chronic low back pain; systemic review. BMJ 2001;322:1511-6.
12. The National board of health and welfare. The Swedish National Quality Register for Pain Rehabilitation. [cited 2006 Nov 13]. Available from http://www.sos.se.
13. WHO. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Geneva: WHO Publications; 2001.
14. Sjölund BH. Current and future treatment strategies for chronic pain. In: Soroker N, Ring H, editors. Advances in physical and rehabilitation medicine. Bologna: Monduzzi Editore; 2003. p. 307-13.
15. Scott PJ, Huskisson EC. Measurement of functional capacity with visual analogue scales. Rheumatol Rehabil 1977;16:257-9.
16. Salen BA, Spangfort EV, Nygren AL, Nordemar R. The Disability Rating Index: an instrument for the assessment of disability in clinical settings. J Clin Epidemiol 1994;47:1423-35.
17. Fugl-Meyer AR, Melin R, Fugl Meyer KS. Life satisfaction in 18- to 64-year old Swedes: in relation to gender, age, partner and immigrant status. J Rehabil Med 2002;34:239-46.
18. Spanswick CC, Parker H. Clinical content of interdisciplinary pain management programmes. In: Main CJ, Spanswick CC, editors. Pain management, an interdisciplinary approach. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone; 2000. p. 255-65.
19. WHO. ICD-10, international statistical classification of diseases and health related problems, tenth version. Uppsala: Almqvist and Wiksell; 1997.
20. McDowell I. Measuring health, a guide to rating scales and questionnaires. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2006. p. 477-83.
21. Bijur PE, Silver W, Gallagher EJ. Reliability of the Visual Analogue Scale for measurement of acute pain. Acad Emerg Med 2001;8:1153-7.
22. Price DD, McGrath PA, Rafii A, Buckingham B. The validation of visual analogue scales as ratio scale measures for chronic and experimental pain. Pain 1983;17:45-56.
23. Chapman CR, Casey KL, Dubner R, Foley KM, Gracely RH, Reading AE. Pain Measurement: an overview. Pain 1985;22:1-31.
24. Grotle M, Brox JI, Vollestad NK. Concurrent comparison of responsiveness in pain and functional status measurements used for patients with low back pain. Spine 2004;29:492-501.
25. van Brakel WH, Anderson AM, Mutatkar RK, Bakirtzief Z, Nicholls PG, Raju MS et al. The Participation Scale: measuring a key concept in public health. Disabil Rehabil 2006;28:193-203.
26. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. [cited 2006 Nov 13]. Available from http://www.wma.net/e/policy/b3.htm.
27. GraphPad Software, Inc. [Homepage]. [cited 2009 March 16]. Available from: www.graphpad.com/www/about.htm.
28. Todd KH, Funk KG, Funk JP, Bonacci R. Clinical significance of reported changes in pain severity. Ann Emerg Med 1996;27:485-9.
29. Gallagher EJ, Liebman M, Bijur PE. Prospective validation of clinically important changes in pain severity measured on a Visual Analogue Scale. Ann Emerg Med 2001;38:633-8.
30. Singer AJ, Thode HC Jr. Determination of the minimal clinically significant difference on a patient Visual Analogue Satisfaction Scale. Acad Emerg Med 1998;5:1007-11.
31. Salaffi F, Stancati A, Silvestri CA, Ciapetti A, Grassi W. Minimal clinically important changes in chronic musculoskeletal pain intensity measured on a numerical rating scale. Eur J Pain 2004;8:283-91.
32. Farrar JT, Young JP Jr, LaMoreaux L, Werth JL, Poole RM. Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain 2001;94:149-58.
33. de Williams AC, Davies HT, Chadury Y. Simple pain rating scales hide complex idiosyncratic meanings. Pain 2000;85:457-63.
34. Palos GR, Mendoza TR, Mobley GM, Cantor SB, Cleeland CS. Asking the community about cutpoints used to describe mild, moderate, and severe pain. J Pain 2006;7:49-56.
35. Jaeschke R, Singer J, Guyatt GH. Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Control Clin Trials 1989;10:407-15.
36. Hagg O, Fritzell P, Nordwall A. The clinical importance of changes in outcome scores after treatment for chronic low back pain. Eur Spine J 2003;12:12-20.
37. Estlander AM, Vanharanta H, Moneta GB, Kaivanto K. Anthropometric variables, self-efficacy beliefs, and pain and disability ratings on the isokinetic performance of low back pain patients. Spine 1994;19:941-7.
38. Council JR, Ahern DK, Follick MJ, Kline CL. Expectancies and functional impairment in chronic low back pain. Pain 1988;33:323-31.
39. Hildebrandt J, Pfingsten M, Saur P, Jansen J. Prediction of success from a multidisciplinary treatment program for chronic low back pain. Spine 1997;22:990-1001.
40. Sandström J, Esbjörnsson E. Return to work after rehabilitation. The significance of the patient's own prediction. Scand J Rehabil Med 1986;18:29-33.
41. Grahn B, Ekdahl C, Borgquist L. Motivation as a predictor of changes in quality of life and working ability in multidisciplinary rehabilitation. A two-year follow-up of a prospective controlled study in patients with prolonged musculoskeletal disorders. Disabil Rehabil 2000;22:639-54.
42. Kores RC, Murphy WD, Rosenthal TL, Elias DB, North WC. Predicting outcome of chronic pain treatment via a modified self-efficacy scale. Behav Res Ther 1990;28:165-9.
43. Dolce JJ, Crocker MF, Doleys DM. Prediction of outcome among chronic pain patients. Behav Res Ther 1986;24:313-9.
44. Philips HC. Avoidance behaviour and its role in sustaining chronic pain. Behav Res Ther 1987;25:273-9.
45. Vlaeyen JW, Kole-Snijders A, Rotteveel AM, Ruesink R, Heuts PH. The role of fear of movement/(re)injury in pain disability. J Occup Rehabil 1995;5:235-52.
46. Coughlin AM, Badura AS, Fleischer TD, Guck TP. Multidisciplinary treatment of chronic pain patients: its efficacy in changing patient locus of control. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000;81:739-40.
47. Walsh DA, Radcliffe JC. Pain beliefs and perceived physical disability of patients with chronic low back pain. Pain 2002;97:23-31.
48. Lame IE, Peters ML, Vlaeyen JW, Kleef M, Patijn J. Quality of life in chronic pain is more associated with beliefs about pain, than with pain intensity. Eur J Pain 2005;9:15-24.
49. McBeth J, Macfarlane GJ, Hunt IM, Silman AJ. Risk factors for persistent chronic widespread pain: a community-based study. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2001;40:95-101.
50. MacFarlane GJ, Thomas E, Papageorgiou AC, Scholium J, Croft PR, Silman AJ. The natural history of chronic pain in the community: a better prognosis than in the clinic? J Rheumatol 1996;23:1617-20.
51. Bergman S, Herrström P, Jacobsson LT, Petersson IF. Chronic widespread pain: a three year follow up of pain distribution and risk factors. J Rheumatol 2002;29:818-25.
52. Papageorgiou AC, Silman AJ, Macfarlane GJ. Chronic widespread pain in the population: A seven year follow up study. Ann Rheum Dis 2002;61:1071-4.
53. Vlaeyen JW, Morley S. Cognitive-behavioral treatments for chronic pain: what works for whom? Clin J Pain 2005;21:1-8.
54. Turk DC. The potential of treatment matching for subgroups of patients with chronic pain: lumping versus splitting. Clin J Pain 2005;21:44-55.